OTExtSum: Extractive Text Summarisation with Optimal Transport (2022.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Extractive text summarisation aims to select salient sentences from a document to form a short yet informative summary. |
| Approach: | They propose to formulate extractive text summarisation as an Optimal Transport (OT) problem and use it to obtain an optimal summary that minimises the transportation cost to a given document. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods and learning-based methods on multiNews, PubMed, BillSum, and CNN/DM datasets. |
Similar Papers
Searching for Effective Neural Extractive Summarization: What Works and What’s Next (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent years have seen success in the use of deep neural networks on text summarization, but there is no clear understanding of why they perform so well or how they might be improved. |
| Approach: | They propose to use different types of model architectures to improve extractive summarization systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art on CNN/DailyMail by a large margin based on observations and analysis. |
Neural Extractive Text Summarization with Syntactic Compression (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent approaches to summarization are either selection-based extraction or generation-based abstraction. |
| Approach: | They propose a neural model for single-document summarization based on joint extraction and syntactic compression. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms an off-the-shelf compression module and its output generally remains grammatical. |
A Set Prediction Network For Extractive Summarization (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent approaches to extracting salient sentences from source document are naive and lack dependencies between sentences. |
| Approach: | They propose a set prediction network to detect redundancy relationship between sentences . they use a non-autoregressive decoder to predict sentences in parallel . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms previous state-of-the-art models on extracted summary datasets. |
Ranking Sentences for Extractive Summarization with Reinforcement Learning (N18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization involves various text rewriting operations and has been identified as a sequence-to-sequence problem. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel algorithm which globally optimizes the ROUGE evaluation metric through a reinforcement learning objective. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art extractive and abstractive systems when evaluated automatically and by humans. |
Extractive Summarization as Text Matching (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Currently, most of the neural extractive summarization systems score and extract sentences individually and model the relationship between sentences. |
| Approach: | They propose to instantiate a neural extractive summarization task as a semantic text matching problem and use it to match a source document and candidate summaries in a semantic space. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework is faster and more efficient than existing frameworks. |
Neural Document Summarization by Jointly Learning to Score and Select Sentences (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Sentence scoring and sentence selection are two main steps in extractive document summarization systems. |
| Approach: | They propose an end-to-end neural network framework for extractive document summarization by jointly learning to score and select sentences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms the state-of-the-art summarization models on the CNN/Daily Mail dataset. |
What Have We Achieved on Text Summarization? (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for text summarization have been investigated, but there are still gaps between them and human professionals. |
| Approach: | They analyze 8 major sources of errors on 10 representative summarization models manually. |
| Outcome: | Aiming to gain more understanding of summarization systems with respect to their strengths and limitations on a fine-grained syntactic and semantic level, we use 8 major sources of errors on 10 representative summarizing models. |
Exploiting Discourse-Level Segmentation for Extractive Summarization (D19-54)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to extract summarize text are based on sentences as the elementary unit, but semantic segments containing supplementary information or descriptive details are often nonessential in the generated summaries. |
| Approach: | They propose to exploit discourse-level segmentation as a finer-grained means to more precisely pinpoint the core content in a document. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves extractive summarization performance on CNN/Daily Mail dataset. |
At Which Level Should We Extract? An Empirical Analysis on Extractive Document Summarization (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have shown that extracting sentences at sentence level is not the best solution for document summarization. |
| Approach: | They propose to extract sub-sentential units based on the constituency parsing tree and a neural extractive model which leverages the sub-sensential information and extracts them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs competitively compared to full sentence extraction under automatic and human evaluations. |
Enhancing Extractive Text Summarization with Topic-Aware Graph Neural Networks (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing extractive summarization models hardly capture inter-sentence relationships, especially in long documents. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a graph neural network to capture inter-sentence relationships efficiently via graph-structured document representation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on CNN/DM and NYT datasets and significantly outperfies them on longer documents. |