Evaluating the Knowledge Dependency of Questions (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation metrics for MCQ generation focus on the n-gram based similarity of the generated MCq to the gold sample and disregard their educational value.
Approach: They propose to use a human survey to measure the MCQ’s answerability given knowledge of the target fact.
Outcome: The proposed methods measure the MCQ’s answerability given knowledge of the target fact.

Similar Papers

Towards a Better Metric for Evaluating Question Generation Systems (D18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation metrics based on n-gram similarity do not correlate well with human judgments . large datasets for document Question Answering (QA) have enabled the development of end-to-end supervised models .
Approach: They propose a scoring function to capture answerability of questions . they also integrate existing similarity metrics into the scoring function .
Outcome: The proposed scoring function improves human judgments on question answerability . the proposed scoring functions are made publicly available .
Revisiting the Self-Consistency Challenges in Multi-Choice Question Formats for Large Language Model Evaluation (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multi-choice questions (MCQs) are a common method for assessing the world knowledge of large language models.
Approach: They propose three knowledge-equivalent question variants to assess LLMs' world knowledge . they propose option position shuffle, option label replacement, and conversion to a True/False format .
Outcome: The proposed questions are shuffle, label replacement, and True/False format.
Automatic Multiple-Choice Question Generation and Evaluation Systems Based on LLM: A Study Case With University Resolutions (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are often used in employee selection and training, but their creation is resource-intensive and requires significant effort and investment.
Approach: They propose to use large language models and prompt engineering techniques to automate the generation and validation of MCQs.
Outcome: The proposed system reduces the burden on human resources and enables scalable, cost-effective MCQ generation.
Automated Prediction of Examinee Proficiency from Short-Answer Questions (2020.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to predicting examinee proficiency from short-answer questions (SAQs) use of labeled data to train on is difficult, and requires expensive expert-rated data.
Approach: They propose a method to predict examinee proficiency from short-answer questions . previous approaches train on manually labeled data to predict human-ratings assigned to SAQs .
Outcome: The proposed model examines examinee proficiency directly and does not require manual training on labeled data.
Evaluating Question Answering Evaluation (D19-58)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing n-gram based QA metrics have a number of drawbacks and are not suitable for all extractive tasks.
Approach: They propose to use BERTScore to evaluate translation for question answering (QA) they also explore whether existing n-gram based metrics are suitable for generative QA .
Outcome: The proposed BERTScore metric fails to provide stronger correlation with human judgements .
Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Above (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multiple choice question answering (MCQA) is popular for LLM evaluation due to its simplicity and human-like testing.
Approach: They argue for a reform of multiple choice question answering (MCQA) they argue for more generative formats based on human testing .
Outcome: The proposed reforms improve the quality of MCQA, the authors argue . they show that even when MCQ is a useful format, its datasets suffer from leakage, unanswerability, shortcuts and saturation.
Can Multiple-choice Questions Really Be Useful in Detecting the Abilities of LLMs? (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are widely used in the evaluation of large language models (LLMs) however, there are concerns about whether MCQ can truly measure LLM’s capabilities.
Approach: They propose to use multiple choice questions to evaluate large language models (LLMs) to assess their capabilities.
Outcome: The proposed methods show that MCQs are less reliable than LFGQs in terms of expected calibration error.
Exploring Automated Distractor Generation for Math Multiple-choice Questions via Large Language Models (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are easy to administer and grade . but crafting high-quality distractors remains labor-intensive and limited scalability .
Approach: They propose to automate the generation of distractors in math MCQs by using large language models to generate distractors.
Outcome: The proposed methods can generate valid distractors, but they are less adept at anticipating common errors or misconceptions among real students.
MCQG-SRefine: Multiple Choice Question Generation and Evaluation with Iterative Self-Critique, Correction, and Comparison Feedback (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Generating multiple-choice questions (MCQG) for professional exams is challenging due to outdated knowledge, hallucination issues, and prompt sensitivity.
Approach: They propose a framework for converting medical cases into high-quality USMLE-style questions using a self-refine-based framework.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves human expert satisfaction regarding quality and difficulty of medical questions.
Generating Plausible Distractors for Multiple-Choice Questions via Student Choice Prediction (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are critical for identifying misconceptions and gaps in knowledge and accurately assessing students' understanding.
Approach: They propose to train a model to generate distractors that are more likely to be selected by students by a pairwise ranker and a distractor generator via Direct Preference Optimization.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms baseline models and performs comparable to humans in various metrics including pairwise rank accuracy and distractor plausibility.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations