Automatic Multiple-Choice Question Generation and Evaluation Systems Based on LLM: A Study Case With University Resolutions (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Sérgio Silva Mucciaccia, Thiago Meireles Paixão, Filipe Wall Mutz, Claudine Santos Badue, Alberto Ferreira de Souza, Thiago Oliveira-Santos
| Challenge: | Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are often used in employee selection and training, but their creation is resource-intensive and requires significant effort and investment. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models and prompt engineering techniques to automate the generation and validation of MCQs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system reduces the burden on human resources and enables scalable, cost-effective MCQ generation. |
Similar Papers
MCQG-SRefine: Multiple Choice Question Generation and Evaluation with Iterative Self-Critique, Correction, and Comparison Feedback (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Generating multiple-choice questions (MCQG) for professional exams is challenging due to outdated knowledge, hallucination issues, and prompt sensitivity. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for converting medical cases into high-quality USMLE-style questions using a self-refine-based framework. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves human expert satisfaction regarding quality and difficulty of medical questions. |
Can Multiple-choice Questions Really Be Useful in Detecting the Abilities of LLMs? (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are widely used in the evaluation of large language models (LLMs) however, there are concerns about whether MCQ can truly measure LLM’s capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multiple choice questions to evaluate large language models (LLMs) to assess their capabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods show that MCQs are less reliable than LFGQs in terms of expected calibration error. |
Exploring Automated Distractor Generation for Math Multiple-choice Questions via Large Language Models (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Wanyong Feng, Jaewook Lee, Hunter McNichols, Alexander Scarlatos, Digory Smith, Simon Woodhead, Nancy Ornelas, Andrew Lan
| Challenge: | Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are easy to administer and grade . but crafting high-quality distractors remains labor-intensive and limited scalability . |
| Approach: | They propose to automate the generation of distractors in math MCQs by using large language models to generate distractors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods can generate valid distractors, but they are less adept at anticipating common errors or misconceptions among real students. |
Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Above (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multiple choice question answering (MCQA) is popular for LLM evaluation due to its simplicity and human-like testing. |
| Approach: | They argue for a reform of multiple choice question answering (MCQA) they argue for more generative formats based on human testing . |
| Outcome: | The proposed reforms improve the quality of MCQA, the authors argue . they show that even when MCQ is a useful format, its datasets suffer from leakage, unanswerability, shortcuts and saturation. |
From Generation to Selection: Findings of Converting Analogical Problem-Solving into Multiple-Choice Questions (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstract and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) is a benchmark designed to evaluate reasoning abilities alone by reducing the amount of prior knowledge and data required to solve the tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a multiple-choice format suitable for assessing stages like Understand and Apply in Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Outcome: | The proposed model supports analogical reasoning and evidence analysis, but LLMs use shortcuts in the MC-LARC format. |
Revisiting the Self-Consistency Challenges in Multi-Choice Question Formats for Large Language Model Evaluation (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multi-choice questions (MCQs) are a common method for assessing the world knowledge of large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose three knowledge-equivalent question variants to assess LLMs' world knowledge . they propose option position shuffle, option label replacement, and conversion to a True/False format . |
| Outcome: | The proposed questions are shuffle, label replacement, and True/False format. |
Selecting Better Samples from Pre-trained LLMs: A Case Study on Question Generation (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Xingdi Yuan, Tong Wang, Yen-Hsiang Wang, Emery Fine, Rania Abdelghani, Hélène Sauzéon, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive prowess in natural language generation. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to select high-quality questions from LLM-generated candidates using round-trip and prompt-based scoring. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach can select high-quality questions from a set of LLM-generated candidates without modification of the underlying model nor rely on human annotations. |
Benchmarking Critical Questions Generation: A Challenging Reasoning Task for Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Progress in the task of Critical Questions Generation has been hindered by the lack of suitable datasets and automatic evaluation standards. |
| Approach: | They propose a comprehensive approach to support the development and benchmarking of systems for this task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach supports the development and benchmarking of systems for this task. |
Right Answer, Wrong Score: Uncovering the Inconsistencies of LLM Evaluation in Multiple-Choice Question Answering (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multiple-choice question answering tasks are one of the most commonly used tasks for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They analyze whether existing answer extraction methods are aligned with human judgment and how they are influenced by answer constraints in the prompt across different domains. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation strategies can be inconsistent with human judgment, and can lead to inaccurate and misleading comparisons. |
EducationQ: Evaluating LLMs’ Teaching Capabilities Through Multi-Agent Dialogue Framework (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as educational tools, yet evaluating their teaching capabilities remains challenging due to the resource-intensive nature of teacher-student interactions. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-agent dialogue framework that efficiently assesses teaching capabilities through simulated dynamic educational scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms open-source models on 1,498 questions across 13 disciplines and 10 difficulty levels on 1,400 questions. |