Challenge: Using simulated feedback, our system (called TeachMe) continually improves with time, and without model retraining.
Approach: They propose to augment a QA model with a dynamic memory of user feedback, containing user-supplied corrections toerroneous model beliefs that users identify during interaction.
Outcome: The proposed system improves with time and without model retraining, and with real users, by 15% on a hidden test set after teaching.

Similar Papers

Continually Improving Extractive QA via Human Feedback (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a study of extractive question answering systems using human feedback shows promising potential for continual learning.
Approach: They study extractive question answering system by using user feedback to improve it . they design and deploy an iterative approach where users ask questions and provide feedback .
Outcome: The proposed model improves over time across different data regimes and domains . human user feedback is more affordable and abundant than annotations provided by trained experts .
Using Interactive Feedback to Improve the Accuracy and Explainability of Question Answering Systems Post-Deployment (2022.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work on question answering focuses on the pre-deployment stage; building an accurate model for deployment.
Approach: They collect feedback from users and train a neural model with the feedback data.
Outcome: The proposed model can explain the correctness or incorrectness of an answer.
Learning to repair: Repairing model output errors after deployment using a dynamic memory of feedback (2022.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Our approach pairs an LM with a growing memory of cases where the user identified an output error and provided general feedback on how to correct it.
Approach: They propose to use an existing script generator to train a model to repair output errors without retraining.
Outcome: The proposed model learns to apply user feedback to repair output errors while avoiding similar past mistakes on new, unseen examples.
Memory-assisted prompt editing to improve GPT-3 after deployment (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large LMs such as GPT-3 can commit mistakes that are obvious to humans, such as interpreting “What word is similar to good?” to mean a homophone, while the user intended a synonym.
Approach: They pair GPT-3 with a growing memory of cases where the model misunderstood the user’s intents, along with user feedback for clarification.
Outcome: The proposed model can correct misunderstandings on four lexical tasks and two advanced ethical reasoning tasks without retraining.
Augmenting Pre-trained Language Models with QA-Memory for Open-Domain Question Answering (2023.eacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for open-domain question-answering use an open book approach . a recent alternative is to retrieve from a collection of previously-generated question-annwer pairs .
Approach: They propose a new QA system that augments a text-to-text model with a large memory of question-answer pairs and a task for the latent step of question retrieval.
Outcome: The proposed system outperforms closed-book QA and can answer multi-hop questions.
Accurate Training of Web-based Question Answering Systems with Feedback from Ranked Users (2023.acl-industry)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent work shows that large-scale annotated datasets are essential for training state-of-the-art Question Answering (QA) models.
Approach: They use large-scale annotated datasets to train question answering models . they use feedback data collected from deployed QA systems to provide cheaper supervision .
Outcome: The proposed model improves on the large scale annotated datasets from QA systems . the proposed model can be easily supervised on large-scale unlabeled web data .
AdapTime: Enabling Adaptive Temporal Reasoning in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for temporal reasoning are limited and apply a fixed pipeline to all questions.
Approach: They propose an adaptive temporal reasoning method that dynamically executes reasoning steps based on context and task requirements.
Outcome: Experiments on two temporal QA benchmarks show the proposed method works.
Can Generative Pre-trained Language Models Serve As Knowledge Bases for Closed-book QA? (2021.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work is limited in using small benchmarks with high test-train overlaps.
Approach: They construct a dataset of closed-book QA using SQuAD and investigate the performance of BART.
Outcome: Experiments show that pre-trained language models can achieve high performance on closed-book QA tasks.
Simulating Bandit Learning from User Feedback for Extractive Question Answering (2022.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Explicit feedback from users can be used to continually improve system performance.
Approach: They study the potential of learning from user feedback for extractive question answering by simulating feedback using supervised data.
Outcome: The proposed model improves on a few examples and can be deployed in new domains without any data annotation effort.
Answer-Supervised Question Reformulation for Enhancing Conversational Machine Comprehension (D19-58)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing question reformulation models are based on supervised question labels without considering feedback information from answers.
Approach: They propose a question reformulation model that integrates conversational history information with reinforcement learning.
Outcome: The proposed model is more effective in conversational machine comprehension with reinforcement learning.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations