Precisely the Point: Adversarial Augmentations for Faithful and Informative Text Generation (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for text generation are weak enough to handle perturbations in inputs, leading to degeneration in faithfulness and informativeness. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for improving faithfulness and informativeness of Seq2Seq models by perturbing word representations and word swapping. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves faithfulness and informativeness of Seq2Seq models under automatic and human evaluation settings. |
Similar Papers
Semi-supervised Adversarial Text Generation based on Seq2Seq models (2022.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In contrast, adversarial training has been used in computer vision to improve models’ robustness due to the discrete nature of text. |
| Approach: | They propose a way to generate adversarial samples by using pseudo-labeled in-domain text data to train a seq2seq model for adversarials and combine it with paraphrase detection. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model generates realistic and relevant adversarial samples compared to other state-of-the-art models and recovers up to 70% of errors. |
FRSUM: Towards Faithful Abstractive Summarization via Enhancing Factual Robustness (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models of abstractive summarization are able to generate fluent and coherent summaries, but they still suffer from the unfaithful generation problem. |
| Approach: | They propose to improve the faithfulness of existing models by enhancing their factual robustness by using a novel training strategy, namely FRSUM, which teaches the model to defend against both explicit adversarial samples and implicit factual adversarials. |
| Outcome: | The proposed training strategy improves faithfulness of various models, such as T5, BART, and T5 . |
Towards Robustness of Text-to-SQL Models Against Natural and Realistic Adversarial Table Perturbation (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing Text-to-SQL parsers are vulnerable to perturbations in NL questions . we propose the Adversarial Table Perturbation (ATP) as a new attacking paradigm . |
| Approach: | They propose to use the Adversarial Table Perturbation to measure robustness of Text-to-SQL parsers against adversarial perturbations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms baseline methods in robustness evaluations on ADVETA and can be used in future projects. |
Evaluating Robustness of Generative Search Engine on Adversarial Factoid Questions (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Xuming Hu, Xiaochuan Li, Junzhe Chen, Yinghui Li, Yangning Li, Xiaoguang Li, Yasheng Wang, Qun Liu, Lijie Wen, Philip Yu, Zhijiang Guo
| Challenge: | Existing large language models (LLMs)-backed generative search engines may not always be accurate. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate the robustness of retrieval-augmented generation in a realistic and high-risk setting where adversaries have only black-box system access. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model exhibits higher susceptibility to factual errors compared to LLMs without retrieval. |
On Evaluation of Adversarial Perturbations for Sequence-to-Sequence Models (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for assessing the robustness of sequence-to-sequence models have been ignored by the literature. |
| Approach: | They propose an evaluation framework for adversarial attacks on seq2seq models that takes the semantic equivalence of the pre- and post-perturbation input into account. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework breaks the assumption that source perturbations should not result in changes in the expected output, but allows for meaning-preserving perturbations that change the output sequence. |
How Do Seq2Seq Models Perform on End-to-End Data-to-Text Generation? (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for data-to-text generation are based on pipelines and end-to end architectures. |
| Approach: | They use multidimensional quality metrics to evaluate models on end-to-end data-totext generation and compare their performance against pipeline models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves in Omission and Inaccuracy Extrinsic errors but increases errors such as Addition. |
Improving Grammatical Error Correction Models with Purpose-Built Adversarial Examples (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for grammatical error correction are data-hungry and it is hard to train a seq2seq model with good performance without suf-Clean. |
| Approach: | They propose a method inspired by adversarial training to generate more meaningful and valuable training examples by continually identifying weak spots of a model and to enhance the model by gradually adding adversarials to the training set. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves generalization and robustness of GEC models by adding adversarial examples to the training set. |
Tougher Text, Smarter Models: Raising the Bar for Adversarial Defence Benchmarks (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in natural language processing have highlighted the vulnerability of deep learning models to adversarial attacks. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for textual adversarial defence that evaluates state-of-the-art defence mechanisms across diverse datasets, models, and tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark incorporates a wide range of datasets and evaluates state-of-the-art defence mechanisms. |
Robust Machine Comprehension Models via Adversarial Training (N18-2)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for the Stanford Question Answering Dataset suffer from a 50% decrease in F1 score during adversarial evaluation based on AddSent. |
| Approach: | They propose an alternative adversary-generation algorithm, AddSentDiverse, that significantly increases the variance within the adversarial training data by providing effective examples that punish the model for making certain superficial assumptions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm can achieve a 36.5% increase in F1 score while maintaining performance on the regular SQuAD task. |
Text Generation with Text-Editing Models (2022.naacl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
Eric Malmi, Yue Dong, Jonathan Mallinson, Aleksandr Chuklin, Jakub Adamek, Daniil Mirylenka, Felix Stahlberg, Sebastian Krause, Shankar Kumar, Aliaksei Severyn
| Challenge: | Text-editing models are a popular alternative to seq2seq for monolingual text generation tasks such as text summarization and style transfer. |
| Approach: | They propose to use text-editing models to predict edit operations applied to the source sequence and to generate outputs word-by-word from scratch. |
| Outcome: | This paper provides an overview of the text-edit based models and their current state-of-the-art approaches. |