FRSUM: Towards Faithful Abstractive Summarization via Enhancing Factual Robustness (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models of abstractive summarization are able to generate fluent and coherent summaries, but they still suffer from the unfaithful generation problem. |
| Approach: | They propose to improve the faithfulness of existing models by enhancing their factual robustness by using a novel training strategy, namely FRSUM, which teaches the model to defend against both explicit adversarial samples and implicit factual adversarials. |
| Outcome: | The proposed training strategy improves faithfulness of various models, such as T5, BART, and T5 . |
Similar Papers
Precisely the Point: Adversarial Augmentations for Faithful and Informative Text Generation (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for text generation are weak enough to handle perturbations in inputs, leading to degeneration in faithfulness and informativeness. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for improving faithfulness and informativeness of Seq2Seq models by perturbing word representations and word swapping. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves faithfulness and informativeness of Seq2Seq models under automatic and human evaluation settings. |
On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing conditional text generation models produce unfaithful and unfaithed summaries . current models accomplish a high level of fluency and coherence . |
| Approach: | They propose to use pretrained models for document summarization to better understand hallucinations . they find that textual entailment measures better correlate with faithfulness . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models generate faithful and factual summaries as evaluated by humans. |
Gradient-Based Adversarial Factual Consistency Evaluation for Abstractive Summarization (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization models often produce inconsistent statements or false facts. |
| Approach: | They propose an efficient weak-supervised adversarial data augmentation approach to generate factual consistency datasets by backpropagating gradients on token embeddings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can make interpretable factual errors tracing on public datasets and is cost-effective. |
Enhancing Factual Consistency in Text Summarization via Counterfactual Debiasing (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive text summarization has produced fluent and informative outputs, but factual inconsistency is a challenge. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that mitigates the causal effects of language bias and irrelevancy bias by counterfactual estimation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baseline methods on two widely used summarization datasets. |
CLIFF: Contrastive Learning for Improving Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for generating abstractive summarization are inconsistent and rely on heuristically created data for error handling. |
| Approach: | They propose a contrastive learning formulation that leverages both positive and negative summaries to train summarization systems that are better at distinguishing between them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed learning framework produces more factual summaries than strong comparisons with post error correction, entailment-based reranking, and unlikelihood training. |
Entity-level Factual Adaptiveness of Fine-tuning based Abstractive Summarization Models (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization models generate factually inconsistent content when parametric knowledge conflicts with knowledge in the input document. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to enhance factual adaptiveness while achieving factual consistency on original datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves factual adaptiveness while achieving factual consistency on original datasets. |
Annotating and Modeling Fine-grained Factuality in Summarization (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent abstractive summarization systems produce factual errors that are not faithful to the input . current methods are lacking in identifying what errors are most important to target . |
| Approach: | They use synthetic and human-labeled data to identify factual errors in summarization and train models on the factuality detection task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model detects factual errors on word, dependency, and sentence levels. |
Improving the Robustness of Summarization Systems with Dual Augmentation (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that state-of-the-art summarization models have a significant decrease in performance on adversarial and noisy test sets. |
| Approach: | They propose a SummAttacker approach to generate adversarial samples based on pre-trained language models that can generate word-level synonym substitution and noise. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better on noisy, attacked, and clean datasets than baseline models and is more robust on noisy and attacked datasets. |
FaMeSumm: Investigating and Improving Faithfulness of Medical Summarization (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing summarization models produce unfaithful outputs for medical text summarizing . a framework to improve faithfulness is proposed to improve medical text summary accuracy . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to improve faithfulness by fine-tuning pre-trained language models based on medical knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves faithfulness on medical summarization tasks. |
Improving Faithfulness by Augmenting Negative Summaries from Fake Documents (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current abstractive summarization systems tend to hallucinate unfaithful content . however, the most common method does not disentangle factual errors from other errors. |
| Approach: | They propose a back-translation-style approach to augment negative samples that mimic factual errors made by the model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves faithfulness without sacrificing informativeness . it incorporates negative samples into training, and produces faithful/unfaithful summaries . |