Dialo-AP: A Dependency Parsing Based Argument Parser for Dialogues (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent work on argument mining has focused on parsing monologues, while neglecting dialogues. |
| Approach: | They propose an end-to-end argument parser that constructs argument graphs from dialogues . they use extensive pre-training and curriculum learning to train AM . |
| Outcome: | The proposed system performs all sub-tasks of AM and achieves significant improvements . it is compared to existing systems and validated through human evaluation . |
Similar Papers
End-to-End Argument Mining as Biaffine Dependency Parsing (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argumentation mining (AM) is a new field of research that uses dependency parsing to analyse arguments. |
| Approach: | They propose a neural end-to-end approach to argument mining based on dependency parsing . their model is biaffine dependency parsed and outperforms the current state-of-the-art . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the state-of-the-art in component identification and relation identification. |
TARGER: Neural Argument Mining at Your Fingertips (P19-3)
Copied to clipboard
Artem Chernodub, Oleksiy Oliynyk, Philipp Heidenreich, Alexander Bondarenko, Matthias Hagen, Chris Biemann, Alexander Panchenko
| Challenge: | Argumentation is a multi-disciplinary field that extends from philosophy and psychology to linguistics as well as to artificial intelligence. |
| Approach: | They propose to use TARGER to tagging arguments in free text and keyword-based retrieval of arguments from a web-scale corpus. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can be used without any reproducibility effort on the user's side and is easily portable to other domains and use cases. |
Argument Mining as a Text-to-Text Generation Task (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument Mining (AM) aims to uncover the argumentative structures within a text. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that generates argumentatively annotated text using a pretrained encoder-decoder language model and a pre-trained decoder. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance on three types of benchmark datasets. |
Unsupervised Argumentation Mining in Student Essays (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | State-of-the-art argumentation mining systems rely on annotated training data and are supervised, thus relying on an annotation of the components and relationships between them. |
| Approach: | They propose to bootstrap from a small set of argument components automatically identified using simple heuristics in combination with reliable contextual cues. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms two supervised baselines and achieves 73.5-83.7% of the performance of a state-of-the-art neural approach. |
Yes, we can! Mining Arguments in 50 Years of US Presidential Campaign Debates (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Political debates are a natural application scenario for Argument Mining. |
| Approach: | They propose an argument mining approach to political debates that uses argument components to annotate 39 political debate from the last 50 years of US presidential campaigns. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms baselines in argument mining over political debates. |
End-to-end Argument Mining with Cross-corpora Multi-task Learning (2022.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument(ation) mining is a task of identifying argument structure from text . lack of training data makes it difficult to train models based on limited data sets. |
| Approach: | They propose an end-to-end cross-corpus argument mining method that uses auxiliary argument mining corpora to train models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms models trained on a single corpus on arguments on arguments in argument mining tasks. |
On the Role of Key Phrases in Argument Mining (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to argument mining often overlook crucial conceptual links between ACs and ARs. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that extracts key phrases from AM benchmarks using an open-source Large Language Model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses baselines on three structurally distinct AM benchmarks by up to 9.5% F1 score, demonstrating its strong potential. |
A Neural Transition-based Model for Argumentation Mining (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for identifying argumentation structures are inefficient and class imbalanced. |
| Approach: | They propose a neural transition-based model that incrementally builds an argumentation graph by generating a sequence of actions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can handle tree and non-tree structured argumentation without structural constraints. |
IAM: A Comprehensive and Large-Scale Dataset for Integrated Argument Mining Tasks (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument mining (AM) is a computational process that is used to analyze information in a debating system. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a large dataset to automate the manual process of debating . they propose to integrate claim extraction, stance classification and evidence extraction tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed tasks can extract claims, stances, evidence and more from a large dataset . the proposed tasks are highly efficient and can be applied to argument mining tasks . |
Argument mining as a multi-hop generative machine reading comprehension task (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument mining is a natural language processing task that aims to generate an argumentative graph given an unstructured argumentative text. |
| Approach: | They propose a new approach which transfers the argument mining task into a multi-hop reading comprehension task by incorporating a "chain of thought" information into the model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach surpasses SOTA results on two arguments mining benchmarks. |