Challenge: Recent studies have shown that discriminative training results in models that exploit these underlying biases to achieve a better held-out performance, without learning the right way to reason.
Approach: They propose a generative context selection model for multi-hop QA that reasons about how the given question could have been generated given a context pair and not just independent contexts.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms the state-of-the-art model on hotpotQA while being comparable to the state of the art answering performance on adversarial held-out set.

Similar Papers

Avoiding Reasoning Shortcuts: Adversarial Evaluation, Training, and Model Development for Multi-Hop QA (P19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: In multi-hop question answering, models need to connect multiple pieces of evidence scattered in a long context to answer the question.
Approach: They propose to use a control unit that dynamically attends to the question at different reasoning hops to guide the model's multi-hop reasoning.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms baseline models but is limited on adversarial test.
Commonsense for Generative Multi-Hop Question Answering Tasks (D18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Reading comprehension QA tasks have seen a recent surge in popularity, yet most work has focused on fact-finding extractive QA.
Approach: They propose a multi-hop generative task that uses a pointer-generator decoder to synthesize disjoint pieces of information within the context to generate an answer.
Outcome: The proposed model performs better than previous generative models and is competitive with current state-of-the-art span prediction models.
Unsupervised Multi-hop Question Answering by Question Generation (2021.naacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing training data for multi-hop question answering (QA) is time-consuming and resource-intensive.
Approach: They propose an unsupervised framework that generates human-like multi-hop training data from homogeneous and heterogeneously data sources.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves 61% and 83% of the supervised learning performance for the HybridQA and HotpotQA datasets.
Understanding and Improving Zero-shot Multi-hop Reasoning in Generative Question Answering (2022.coling-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Generative question answering (QA) models generate answers to complex questions, but their mechanism for doing so is still poorly understood.
Approach: They decompose multi-hop questions into multiple corresponding single-hop question chains and find marked inconsistency in QA models’ answers on these pairs of ostensibly identical question chains.
Outcome: The proposed models lack zero-shot multi-hop reasoning ability when trained on single-hop questions and on logical forms.
A Simple Yet Strong Pipeline for HotpotQA (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing models for multi-hop question answering have been proposed with varying complexities.
Approach: They propose to use BERT to identify potentially relevant sentences independently of each other . they feed selected sentences into a standard BERT span prediction model to choose an answer .
Outcome: The proposed pipeline outperforms existing models on hotpotQA and support identification.
Low-Resource Generation of Multi-hop Reasoning Questions (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to generate valid and fluent questions from text are limited and insufficient for training.
Approach: They propose to generate multi-hop reasoning questions from the raw text in a low resource circumstance by deducing over multiple relations on several sentences in the text.
Outcome: The proposed model can be applied to the task of machine reading comprehension and achieve significant performance improvements.
Robustifying Multi-hop QA through Pseudo-Evidentiality Training (2021.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to robustify multi-hop question answering models require expensive annotations.
Approach: They propose a method to supervise answers with right reasoning chains without annotations . they compare answers confidence with and without evidence sentences to generate "pseudo-evidentiality" annotations.
Outcome: The proposed model is accurate and robust in multi-hop reasoning.
Generate-then-Ground in Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multi-hop Question Answering (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to solve multi-hop question are constrained by the retriever and the noise in the retrieved documents.
Approach: They propose a framework that integrates parametric knowledge of large language models with external documents to solve a multi-hop question.
Outcome: The proposed framework is based on the parametric knowledge of LLMs and external documents to solve a multi-hop question.
Do Multi-Hop Question Answering Systems Know How to Answer the Single-Hop Sub-Questions? (2021.eacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing models fail to answer a large portion of sub-questions . Existing systems have achieved super-human performance .
Approach: They propose to use a neural decomposition model to generate sub-questions for a multi-hop question and extract the corresponding sub-answers.
Outcome: The proposed model is based on a hotpotQA dataset with a multi-hop question and sub-answers.
Simple yet Effective Bridge Reasoning for Open-Domain Multi-Hop Question Answering (D19-58)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work on open-domain multi-hop question answering relies on off-the-shelf information retrieval techniques to retrieve answer passages.
Approach: They propose a new subproblem for open-domain multi-hop question answering . they aim to recognize the anchor from a set of start passages with a reading comprehension model .
Outcome: The proposed method significantly improves the baseline method on the open-domain hotpotQA benchmark.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations