Understanding and Improving Zero-shot Multi-hop Reasoning in Generative Question Answering (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Generative question answering (QA) models generate answers to complex questions, but their mechanism for doing so is still poorly understood. |
| Approach: | They decompose multi-hop questions into multiple corresponding single-hop question chains and find marked inconsistency in QA models’ answers on these pairs of ostensibly identical question chains. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models lack zero-shot multi-hop reasoning ability when trained on single-hop questions and on logical forms. |
Similar Papers
Do Multi-Hop Question Answering Systems Know How to Answer the Single-Hop Sub-Questions? (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models fail to answer a large portion of sub-questions . Existing systems have achieved super-human performance . |
| Approach: | They propose to use a neural decomposition model to generate sub-questions for a multi-hop question and extract the corresponding sub-answers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on a hotpotQA dataset with a multi-hop question and sub-answers. |
Unsupervised Multi-hop Question Answering by Question Generation (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing training data for multi-hop question answering (QA) is time-consuming and resource-intensive. |
| Approach: | They propose an unsupervised framework that generates human-like multi-hop training data from homogeneous and heterogeneously data sources. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves 61% and 83% of the supervised learning performance for the HybridQA and HotpotQA datasets. |
Few-Shot Data Synthesis for Open Domain Multi-Hop Question Answering (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent approaches to multi-hop question answering rely on in-context learning . however, these models contain billions of parameters making them inefficient at inference time. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that allows for improving smaller language models with less than 10 human-annotated QA pairs by synthesizing millions of multi-hop questions and claims to fine tune language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves model performance on multi-hop question answering and fact verification benchmarks while being almost one-third the size in parameter count. |
Low-Resource Generation of Multi-hop Reasoning Questions (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to generate valid and fluent questions from text are limited and insufficient for training. |
| Approach: | They propose to generate multi-hop reasoning questions from the raw text in a low resource circumstance by deducing over multiple relations on several sentences in the text. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be applied to the task of machine reading comprehension and achieve significant performance improvements. |
Simple yet Effective Bridge Reasoning for Open-Domain Multi-Hop Question Answering (D19-58)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on open-domain multi-hop question answering relies on off-the-shelf information retrieval techniques to retrieve answer passages. |
| Approach: | They propose a new subproblem for open-domain multi-hop question answering . they aim to recognize the anchor from a set of start passages with a reading comprehension model . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly improves the baseline method on the open-domain hotpotQA benchmark. |
Do Multi-hop Readers Dream of Reasoning Chains? (D19-58)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for multihop reasoning are limited in their performance . multi-hop reasoning requires the ability to gather information from multiple passages . |
| Approach: | They propose a method that provides the full reasoning chain of multiple passages instead of just one final passage where the answer appears. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on existing models by providing the full reasoning chain of multiple passages instead of just one final passage where the answer appears. |
Robustifying Multi-hop QA through Pseudo-Evidentiality Training (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to robustify multi-hop question answering models require expensive annotations. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to supervise answers with right reasoning chains without annotations . they compare answers confidence with and without evidence sentences to generate "pseudo-evidentiality" annotations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is accurate and robust in multi-hop reasoning. |
Hop, Union, Generate: Explainable Multi-hop Reasoning without Rationale Supervision (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods rely on supervision for both answers and rationales, but they have limited capacities in modeling interactions between sentences, let alone reasoning across multiple documents. |
| Approach: | They propose a principled, probabilistic approach for training explainable multi-hop question answering systems without rationale supervision. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is more accurate at selecting rationales than previous methods while maintaining similar accuracy in predicting answers. |
Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Steps (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multi-hop question answering datasets do not provide a complete explanation for the reasoning process from the question to the answer. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-hop question answering dataset that uses structured and unstructured data to test reasoning skills. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset ensures multi-hop reasoning while being challenging for multi-models. |
Reinforced Multi-task Approach for Multi-hop Question Generation (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Empirical evaluation shows our model to outperform the single-hop question generation models on both automatic evaluation metrics such as BLEU, METEOR, and ROUGE and human evaluation metrics for quality and coverage of the generated questions. |
| Approach: | They propose a question-aware reward function to maximize the utilization of supporting facts in the context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms single-hop neural question generation models on automatic evaluation metrics and human evaluation metrics for quality and coverage of the generated questions. |