Glancing Transformer for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing non-autoregressive neural machine translation methods are either inferior to Transformer or require multiple decoding passes, leading to reduced speedup. |
| Approach: | They propose a Glancing Language Model (GLM) for single-pass parallel generation models and Glancing Transformer (GLAT) with only single- pass decoding, GLAT is able to generate high-quality translation with 8-15 speedup. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms all previous non-autoregressive methods on multiple language directions and is nearly comparable to Transformer. |
Similar Papers
Fully Non-autoregressive Neural Machine Translation: Tricks of the Trade (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing non-autoregressive neural machine translation models are slow to learn the dependency between output tokens. |
| Approach: | They propose to use fully non-autoregressive neural machine translation (NAT) to predict tokens with single forward of neural networks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art results on three translation benchmarks with comparable performance to autoregressive and iterative NAT systems. |
Diffusion Glancing Transformer for Parallel Sequence-to-Sequence Learning (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that non-autoregressive generation models are superior in generation efficiency but inferior in generation quality. |
| Approach: | They propose a diffusion glancing transformer which employs a modality diffusion process and residual glancy sampling to improve multi-modality modeling. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms autoregressive and non-autoregressive models on machine translation and text generation benchmarks. |
Enriching Non-Autoregressive Transformer with Syntactic and Semantic Structures for Neural Machine Translation (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing non-autoregressive models have boosted the efficiency of neural machine translation, but their performance is significantly worse than that of autoregressive counterparts. |
| Approach: | They propose to incorporate syntactic and semantic structures among natural languages into a non-autoregressive Transformer for the task of neural machine translation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves faster speed and keeps translation quality compared with other models. |
Diffusion Directed Acyclic Transformer for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation (2025.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Non-autoregressive transformers (NATs) often encounter performance challenges due to the multi-modality problem. |
| Approach: | They propose a direct-acyclic transformer (DAT) that captures multiple translation modalities to paths in a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) this allows the model to integrate latent variables into the model, which is crucial for DAT to achieve state-of-the-art performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model captures multiple translation modalities to paths in a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) but the collaboration with the latent variable introduced through the Glancing training is crucial for the model to attain state-of-the-art performance. |
Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation: A Call for Clarity (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Non-autoregressive translation models require a single forward pass to generate the output sequence instead of iteratively producing each predicted token. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a single forward pass to generate the output sequence instead of iteratively producing each predicted token. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models improve translation quality and speed under third-party testing environments. |
Syntactically Supervised Transformers for Faster Neural Machine Translation (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Standard decoders for neural machine translation generate a single token per timestep, which slows inference . a series of controlled experiments demonstrates that SynST decodes sentences 5x faster than the baseline autoregressive Transformer. |
| Approach: | They propose a syntactically supervised Transformer that generates all target tokens in one shot . synST is a variant of the Transformer architecture that autoregressively predicts a chunked parse tree . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method decodes sentences 5x faster than the baseline method on En-De and En-Fr datasets while achieving higher BLEU scores. |
Semi-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to neural machine translation are typically autoregressive but suffer from low parallelizability and thus slow at decoding long sequences. |
| Approach: | They propose a semi-autoregressive Transformer model for fast sequence generation that keeps the autoregressive property in global but relieves in local . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 5.58 speedup while maintaining 88% translation quality, significantly better than previous non-autoregressive methods. |
Retrieving Sequential Information for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that the Reinforce-NAT system surpasses the baseline NAT system by a significant margin on BLEU without decelerating the decoding speed. |
| Approach: | They propose a sequence-level training method and a Transformer decoder to fuse the target sequential information into the top layer of the decoded Transformer. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model surpasses the baseline NAT system on BLEU without decelerating the decoding speed and achieves comparable translation performance to the autoregressive Transformer model with considerable speedup. |
Low-resource Neural Machine Translation: Benchmarking State-of-the-art Transformer for Wolof<->French (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural machine translation (NMT) systems can translate between French (FR) 1 and Wolof (WO, ISO 639-3), a lowresource Niger-Congo language mainly spoken in Senegal (Gamble, 1950). |
| Approach: | They propose two neural machine translation systems based on sequence-to-sequence with attention and Transformer architectures to translate between French (FR) 1 and Wolof (WO, ISO 639-3). |
| Outcome: | The proposed models outperform the classic sequence-to-sequence model in all settings and are less sensitive to noise. |
Imitation Learning for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing non-autoregressive translation models lack parallel decoding, which is a bottleneck for NMT decoding. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for non-autoregressive machine translation that emulates the autoregressive model by sampling sentence length in parallel. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 31.85 BLEU on WMT16 RoEn and 30.68 BLUE on IWSLT16 EnDe on the IWSLD16, WMT14 and WMT15 datasets. |