Let’s Stop Incorrect Comparisons in End-to-end Relation Extraction! (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing literature on Relation Extraction (RE) uses multiple evaluation setups to compare performance. |
| Approach: | They propose to quantify the most common comparison mistake and evaluate it leads to overestimating the final RE performance by around 5% on ACE05. |
| Outcome: | The proposed meta-analysis overestimates the final RE performance by around 5% on ACE05. |
Similar Papers
The State of Relation Extraction Data Quality: Is Bigger Always Better? (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Relation extraction (RE) methods extract tuples of relationships from text . many datasets with frequent label errors have been used . |
| Approach: | They review recent surveys and a sample of recent RE methods papers . they find that real-time evaluations of RE methods are possible . |
| Outcome: | a sample of 38 datasets currently being used shows that many have frequent label errors . a small number of relations in specific domains can more realistically evaluate methods . |
Separating Retention from Extraction in the Evaluation of End-to-end Relation Extraction (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | State-of-the-art NLP models adopt shallow heuristics that limit their generalization capability. |
| Approach: | They propose to use heuristics that limit their generalization capability to model lexical overlap with the training set in Named-Entity Recognition and Event or Type heuristic in Relation Extraction to test their models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can perform better on the two key tasks, while the retention of training relation triples. |
CrossRE: A Cross-Domain Dataset for Relation Extraction (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Relation Extraction (RE) evaluation is limited to in-domain setups . despite the drought of research on cross-domain RE, its practical importance remains . |
| Approach: | They propose a cross-domain benchmark for relation extraction which includes multi-label annotations and meta-data to include explanations and flags of difficult instances. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model includes explanations and flags of difficult instances. |
What Do You Mean by Relation Extraction? A Survey on Datasets and Study on Scientific Relation Classification (2022.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing RE surveys focus on modeling techniques, but there are few that are based on real-world scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose to survey RE datasets and revisit the task definition and its adoption by the community. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves the reliability of RE evaluations across multiple datasets and reveals significant discrepancies in annotations. |
TACRED Revisited: A Thorough Evaluation of the TACRED Relation Extraction Task (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for Relation Extraction (RE) still show a high error rate . label errors account for 8% absolute F1 test error, and more than 50% of examples need to be relabeled. |
| Approach: | They validate the most challenging 5K examples using trained annotators and analyze misclassifications on the challenging instances. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods perform well on the most challenging datasets and improve on the relabeled test set. |
Manual Evaluation Matters: Reviewing Test Protocols of Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Tianyu Gao, Xu Han, Yuzhuo Bai, Keyue Qiu, Zhiyu Xie, Yankai Lin, Zhiyuan Liu, Peng Li, Maosong Sun, Jie Zhou
| Challenge: | Distantly supervised relation extraction (RE) has attracted much attention in the past few years . previous methods to evaluate models manually or directly on autolabeled data have produced inaccurate evaluations . |
| Approach: | They propose to use distant supervision to generate large-scale autolabeled data . they build manually-annotated test sets for two DS-RE datasets and evaluate models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method produces 53% wrong labels at the entity pair level in the popular NYT10 dataset. |
A Frustratingly Easy Approach for Entity and Relation Extraction (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on end-to-end relation extraction models combine two tasks: named entity recognition and relation extraction. |
| Approach: | They propose a pipelined approach for entity and relation extraction that uses two independent encoders to construct the relation model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves an 8.16 speedup with a slight reduction in accuracy on standard benchmarks. |
More Data, More Relations, More Context and More Openness: A Review and Outlook for Relation Extraction (2020.aacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
Xu Han, Tianyu Gao, Yankai Lin, Hao Peng, Yaoliang Yang, Chaojun Xiao, Zhiyuan Liu, Peng Li, Jie Zhou, Maosong Sun
| Challenge: | Existing methods for extracting relational facts from text have been successful . but with explosion of Web text, human knowledge is increasing drastically . |
| Approach: | They propose to improve relation extraction methods to extract relational facts from text . they analyze existing methods and show promising directions towards more powerful RE . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods can extract relational facts from text, but they are still lacking in the current field. |
An Improved Baseline for Sentence-level Relation Extraction (2022.aacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Sentence-level relation extraction (RE) aims at identifying the relationship between two entities in a sentence. |
| Approach: | They propose to improve sentence-level relation extraction by adding entity representations with typed markers to the model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing methods on entity representation and noisy labels on TACRED dataset. |
CoNLL#: Fine-grained Error Analysis and a Corrected Test Set for CoNLL-03 English (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a glass ceiling for named entity recognition systems has been suggested for 2021 . however, the performance of the most popular NER benchmarks has plateaued since then . we investigate what NER models are still struggling with . |
| Approach: | They perform a fine-grained evaluation of the model outputs by adding document annotations to the CoNLL-03 English dataset to identify lingering errors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is able to correct errors and guide future work. |