A Frustratingly Easy Approach for Entity and Relation Extraction (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on end-to-end relation extraction models combine two tasks: named entity recognition and relation extraction. |
| Approach: | They propose a pipelined approach for entity and relation extraction that uses two independent encoders to construct the relation model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves an 8.16 speedup with a slight reduction in accuracy on standard benchmarks. |
Similar Papers
ENPAR:Enhancing Entity and Entity Pair Representations for Joint Entity Relation Extraction (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for joint entity relation extraction use multitask learning frameworks, but annotations for additional tasks are hard to obtain. |
| Approach: | They propose a pre-training method to improve the joint extraction performance with just extra entity annotations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods on ACE05, SciERC, and NYT and outperformed BERT on other tasks. |
An End-to-end Model for Entity-level Relation Extraction using Multi-instance Learning (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using a multi-task approach, we extract facts from documents at entity level. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-task approach that builds upon coreference resolution and gathers relevant signals via multi-instance learning with multi-level representations combining global entity and local mention information. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is on par with task-specific learning, though more efficient due to shared parameters and training steps. |
Entity or Relation Embeddings? An Analysis of Encoding Strategies for Relation Extraction (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to relation extraction use concatenating embeddings of head and tail entities . however, such representations capture the types of the entities involved, leading to false positives and confusion between relations involving entities of the same type. |
| Approach: | They propose a model which combines [MASK] embeddings with entity embedds to learn relation embeddations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the state-of-the-art on several benchmarks . it uses a self-supervised pre-training strategy which further improves the results. |
An Empirical Study of Pipeline vs. Joint approaches to Entity and Relation Extraction (2022.aacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Entity and Relation Extraction tasks are often compared to pipeline approaches . a recent study shows that joint approaches can produce comparable results . |
| Approach: | They propose to use two approaches to the Entity and Relation Extraction task to compare their performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms the best pipeline model but improperly designed approaches may have poor performance. |
ITER: Iterative Transformer-based Entity Recognition and Relation Extraction (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in NLP generate structured information in an autoregressive manner, causing low throughput . authors propose an efficient encoder-based relation extraction model that performs the task in three parallelizable steps. |
| Approach: | They propose an efficient encoder-based relation extraction model that performs the task in three parallelizable steps. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art on two datasets and is faster than existing models. |
Two are Better than One: Joint Entity and Relation Extraction with Table-Sequence Encoders (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Named entity recognition and relation extraction are two important fundamental problems. |
| Approach: | They propose to design two separate encoders to capture two different types of information in the representation learning process. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods show significant improvements on standard datasets. |
Relation Extraction using Explicit Context Conditioning (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for relation extraction fail to capture complex and long dependencies . end-to-end models that learn both NER and RE can solve this problem . |
| Approach: | They propose to use second-order relations to compute relation scores for relation extraction (RE) . they propose to combine second- and first-order relation scores to obtain final relation scores . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method leads to state-of-the-art performance over two biomedical datasets. |
UniRE: A Unified Label Space for Entity Relation Extraction (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing joint entity relation extraction models setup two separate label spaces for the two sub-tasks . |
| Approach: | They propose to eliminate the different treatment on the two sub-tasks’ label spaces by applying a unified classifier to predict each cell’s label. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves competitive accuracy with the best extractor and is faster. |
Extracting Entities and Relations with Joint Minimum Risk Training (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for detecting entities and relations are limited by the complexity of the joint learning paradigm. |
| Approach: | They propose a joint learning paradigm based on minimum risk training . they implement a strong and simple neural network to execute the MRT . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is able to achieve state-of-the-art in the extraction task on ACE05 and NYT datasets. |
On the Role of Discriminative Models in Generative Relation Extraction (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for relation extraction (RE) are discriminative and generative . previous studies show that discriminative models can support generative RE . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages discriminative models to produce a top-k set of candidate relations and integrates this knowledge into generative models via in-context or prompt learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art on five widely used RE benchmarks. |