Papers by Yikun Jiang
SeCuRepair: Semantics-Aligned, Curriculum-Driven, and Reasoning-Enhanced Vulnerability Repair Framework (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Chengran Yang, Ting Zhang, Jinfeng Jiang, Xin Zhou, Haoye Tian, Mingzhe Du, Jieke Shi, Junkai Chen, Yikun Li, Eng Lieh Ouh, Lwin Khin Shar, David Lo
| Challenge: | Existing methods for automating vulnerability repair suffer from syntactic overfitting . nvd published 49,230 Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) records in 2025 alone . |
| Approach: | They propose a semantic-aware reward framework that optimizes for code semantic equivalence rather than lexical mimicry. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art frameworks on repository-level splits . it incorporates expert-aligned reasoning mechanism that grounds patch generation in structured diagnosis. |
BLADE: Benchmarking Language Model Agents for Data-Driven Science (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Ken Gu, Ruoxi Shang, Ruien Jiang, Keying Kuang, Richard-John Lin, Donghe Lyu, Yue Mao, Youran Pan, Teng Wu, Jiaqian Yu, Yikun Zhang, Tianmai Zhang, Lanyi Zhu, Mike Merrill, Jeffrey Heer, Tim Althoff
| Challenge: | Language model-based agents can be used to conduct and support data-driven science, but evaluating them on open-ended tasks is challenging due to multiple valid approaches, partially correct steps, and different ways to express the same decisions. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to automatically evaluate agents’ multifaceted approaches to open-ended research questions. |
| Outcome: | BLADE evaluates agents’ multifaceted approaches to open-ended research questions using data from 12 datasets and research questions drawn from existing scientific literature. |
Beyond Self-Report: Bridging the Intention-Behavior Gap in Critical Thinking Assessment via Interpretable Multi-Agent System (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zekun Li, Jifan Yu, Haoxuan Li, Ye He, Daniel Zhang-Li, Shangqing Tu, Joy Jia Yin Lim, Yikun Jiang, Jiaxin Yuan, Yu Zhang
| Challenge: | Accurate assessment of critical thinking is limited by the Intention Behavior Gap in psychology . evaluators that measure self-reported competence are limited by multiagent architectures . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that operationalizes cognitive assessment into an interpretable multi-agent workflow with Assessment Chain-of-Thought. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework aligns better with human expert ratings than gold-standard inventories on large-scale simulations and human participants. |