Papers by Ke Niu
Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Chinese Ancient Documents: From OCR to Knowledge Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Haiyang Yu, Yuchuan Wu, Fan Shi, Jinghui Lu, Ke Niu, Xiaodong Ge, Minghan Zhuo, Jingqun Tang, Bin Li
| Challenge: | Existing document benchmarks focus on English printed texts or simplified Chinese . current vision-language models struggle with visual complexity and poor adaptability . |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate Chinese ancient documents' visual/linguistic complexity . ancient documents are valuable cultural heritage, but they face challenges in digitization and understanding . |
| Outcome: | the first benchmark for Chinese ancient documents evaluates VLMs from OCR to knowledge reasoning . ancient documents carry thousands of years of Chinese history and culture . traditional methods only scan images, while current models struggle with visual complexity . |
MdEval: Massively Multilingual Code Debugging (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Shukai Liu, Linzheng Chai, Jian Yang, Jiajun Shi, He Zhu, Liran Wang, Jin Ke, Wei Zhang, Hualei Zhu, Shuyue Guo, Tao Sun, Jiaheng Liu, Yunlong Duan, Yu Hao, Liqun Yang, Guanglin Niu, Ge Zhang, Zhoujun Li
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks primarily focus on Python and are limited in terms of language diversity. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual debugging benchmark that includes 3.9K test samples of 20 programming languages and introduces the debug instruction corpora MdEval-Instruct by injecting bugs into the correct multilingual queries and solutions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark includes 3.9K test samples of 20 programming languages and covers the automated program repair task, bug localization task, and bug identification task. |
IF-CRITIC: Towards a Fine-Grained LLM Critic for Instruction-Following Evaluation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Bosi Wen, Yilin Niu, Cunxiang Wang, Pei Ke, Xiaoying Ling, Ying Zhang, Aohan Zeng, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation models for instruction-following have many shortcomings, such as substantial costs and unreliable assessments. |
| Approach: | They propose an LLM critic for fine-grained instruction-following evaluation using a checklist generator and a constraint-level preference optimization method. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model beats strong LLM-as-a-Judge baselines in evaluations under lower computational overhead compared to baselines. |
IF-RewardBench: Benchmarking Judge Models for Instruction-Following Evaluation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for instruction-following lack data coverage and oversimplified pairwise evaluation paradigms that misalign with model optimization scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a meta-evaluation benchmark for instruction-following that covers diverse instruction and constraint types and a preference graph for each instruction. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on IF-RewardBench show that the proposed benchmark achieves a stronger positive correlation with downstream task performance compared to existing benchmarks. |