IF-CRITIC: Towards a Fine-Grained LLM Critic for Instruction-Following Evaluation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Bosi Wen, Yilin Niu, Cunxiang Wang, Pei Ke, Xiaoying Ling, Ying Zhang, Aohan Zeng, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation models for instruction-following have many shortcomings, such as substantial costs and unreliable assessments. |
| Approach: | They propose an LLM critic for fine-grained instruction-following evaluation using a checklist generator and a constraint-level preference optimization method. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model beats strong LLM-as-a-Judge baselines in evaluations under lower computational overhead compared to baselines. |
Similar Papers
IF-RewardBench: Benchmarking Judge Models for Instruction-Following Evaluation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for instruction-following lack data coverage and oversimplified pairwise evaluation paradigms that misalign with model optimization scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a meta-evaluation benchmark for instruction-following that covers diverse instruction and constraint types and a preference graph for each instruction. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on IF-RewardBench show that the proposed benchmark achieves a stronger positive correlation with downstream task performance compared to existing benchmarks. |
Critic-CoT: Boosting the Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Model via Chain-of-Thought Critic (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Xin Zheng, Jie Lou, Boxi Cao, Xueru Wen, Yuqiu Ji, Hongyu Lin, Yaojie Lu, Xianpei Han, Debing Zhang, Le Sun
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to improve the reasoning performance of large language models rely on intuitive instance-level feedback, which limits the reasoning capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that pushes LLMs toward System-2-like critic capability by using a step-wise CoT reasoning paradigm and automatic construction of weak-supervision data without human annotation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model significantly improves task-solving performance by filtering out invalid solutions or iterative refinement. |
CriticBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Critique-Correct Reasoning (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | CriticBench is a benchmark designed to assess LLMs’ abilities to critique and refine their reasoning across a variety of tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess LLMs' ability to critique and correct reasoning across a variety of tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark examines the performance of 17 large language models in generation, critique, and correction reasoning. |
PACE: Improving Prompt with Actor-Critic Editing for Large Language Model (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prompt with Actor-Critic Editing (PACE) for LLMs improves performance of different human-written prompts, resulting in significant performance discrepancies. |
| Approach: | They propose to use LLMs as actors and critics to enable automatic prompt editing by taking feedback from both actors performing prompt and criticizing response into account. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves the performance of human-written prompts by 98% and compares to high-quality human-writing prompts. |
ACING: Actor-Critic for Instruction Learning in Black-Box LLMs (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have impressive capabilities across tasks like classification, summarization, and reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose an actor-critic reinforcement learning framework that formulates instruction optimization as a stateless, continuous-action problem. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms human-written prompts in 76% of instruction-induction tasks with gains of 33 points and 10-point improvement over baseline. |
From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ming Li, Yong Zhang, Zhitao Li, Jiuhai Chen, Lichang Chen, Ning Cheng, Jianzong Wang, Tianyi Zhou, Jing Xiao
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the landscape of artificial intelligence. |
| Approach: | They propose a self-guided method to identify and select cherry samples from open-source datasets, minimizing manual curation and potential cost for instruction tuning an LLM. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method enables LLMs to identify discrepancies between expected responses and intrinsic generation capability, and a marked uptick in model training efficiency. |
Training Language Model to Critique for Better Refinement (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Tianshu Yu, Chao Xiang, Mingchuan Yang, Pei Ke, Bosi Wen, Cunxiang Wang, Jiale Cheng, Li Zhang, Xinyu Mu, Chuxiong Sun, Minlie Huang
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have remarkable evaluation and critique capabilities, providing insightful feedback and identifying flaws in various tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to train critic models using refinement signals to generate feedback loops where critiques guide the model in refining its responses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms traditional methods and open-source models in terms of critique quality and refinement outcomes. |
Learning to Refine with Fine-Grained Natural Language Feedback (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has explored the capability of large language models to identify and correct errors in LLM-generated responses. |
| Approach: | They propose to combine refinement with feedback into three distinct competencies . step 1: Detect, Critique, Refine gives a fine-grained feedback about errors . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing refinement approaches and models not fine-tuned for factuality critiquing. |
Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Tianhao Wu, Weizhe Yuan, Olga Golovneva, Jing Xu, Yuandong Tian, Jiantao Jiao, Jason E Weston, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar
| Challenge: | Existing methods for improving large language models have focused on improving model responses rather than judgment capabilities, resulting in rapid saturation during iterative training. |
| Approach: | They propose an iterative Meta-Rewarding step where the model judges its own judgements and uses that feedback to refine its judgment skills. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves Llama-3-8B-Instruct from 22.9% to 39.4% on AlpacaEval 2 and 20.6% to 29.1% on Arena-Hard. |
LLMRefine: Pinpointing and Refining Large Language Models via Fine-Grained Actionable Feedback (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Wenda Xu, Daniel Deutsch, Mara Finkelstein, Juraj Juraska, Biao Zhang, Zhongtao Liu, William Yang Wang, Lei Li, Markus Freitag
| Challenge: | Recent large language models (LLMs) are leveraging human feedback to improve their output quality. however, human feedback is costly to collect, especially at inference time when the model provides new, unseen input. |
| Approach: | They propose an inference-time optimization method to refine large language models' output based on fine-grained feedback to pinpoint defects and guide iterative refinement . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method consistently outperforms baseline approaches on three text generation tasks, including machine translation, long-form question answering, and topical summarization. |