Papers by Kai Ying
Time-RA: Towards Time Series Reasoning for Anomaly Diagnosis with LLM Feedback (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yiyuan Yang, Zichuan Liu, Lei Song, Kai Ying, Stephen Wang, Joshua Thomas Bamford, Svitlana Vyetrenko, Jiang Bian, Qingsong Wen
| Challenge: | Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) has traditionally focused on binary classification and lacks the fine-grained categorization and explanatory reasoning required for transparent decision-making. |
| Approach: | They propose a time-series reasoning task that reformulates TSAD from discriminative to reasoning-intensive paradigm. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task reformulates TSAD from discriminative to reasoning-intensive paradigm. |
Intuitive or Dependent? Investigating LLMs’ Behavior Style to Conflicting Prompts (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Extensive experiments with seven Large Language Models reveal their varying behaviors. |
| Approach: | They investigate the behaviors of Large Language Models when faced with conflicting prompts versus their internal memory. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments with seven LLMs reveal their varying behaviors. |
Knowledge as A Bridge: Improving Cross-domain Answer Selection with External Knowledge (C18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to answer selection are limited in domains with limited labeled data. |
| Approach: | They propose a Knowledge-aware Attentive Network framework for cross-domain answer selection that uses the knowledge base as a bridge to enable knowledge transfer from the source domain to the target domain. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms strong competitors by a noticeable margin in cross-domain answer selection. |
Empowering Tabular Data Preparation with Language Models: Why and How? (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Mengshi Chen, Yuxiang Sun, Tengchao Li, Jianwei Wang, Kai Wang, Xuemin Lin, Ying Zhang, Wenjie Zhang
| Challenge: | Tabular data preparation is a critical step in enhancing the usability of tabular data. |
| Approach: | They analyze how LMs can be combined with other components for different tabular data preparation tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods lack the ability to capture the relationships within tables and adapt to the tasks involved. |
Cooperative Denoising for Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction (C18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for distantly supervised relation extraction suffer from noisy labeling problem, which can severely degrade its performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for distantly supervised relation extraction that leverages text corpus and knowledge graph and a cooperative module involving their mutual learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces the noisy labels and achieves substantial improvement over the state-of-the-art methods. |
Relabel the Noise: Joint Extraction of Entities and Relations via Cooperative Multiagents (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for entity and relation extraction require light human annotation efforts. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to re-label noisy instances with a cooperative group . they use a confidence consensus module to gather the wisdom of all agents . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art methods on two real-world datasets. |
Agent-based Substructure Counting under Local Differential Privacy (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have demonstrated the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to process graph problems. |
| Approach: | They propose to decompose substructure counting into node-level tasks distributed among node agents and embed the knowledge of distributed algorithms and DP frameworks in the curator agent and privacy controller. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on 6 real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework for substructure counting tasks under edge local differential privacy (LDP). |