Papers by Jing Huo
CoT-VTM: Visual-to-Music Generation with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for visual-to-music generation lack large-scale, high-quality visual-music paired datasets and lack of direct semantic correspondence between visuals and music. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that distills Chain-of-Thought reasoning to enable visual-to-music generation without paired data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves optimal performance on image-to-music and video-to music tasks. |
Beyond Excess and Deficiency: Adaptive Length Bias Mitigation in Reward Models for RLHF (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing efforts to mitigate length bias in reward models have decreased accuracy . achieving an automatic proxy that perfectly replicates human judgment is challenging in practice. |
| Approach: | They propose an adaptive approach that dynamically adjusts the influence of response length in reward evaluations according to the context of the query. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach reduces unnecessary verbosity while improving overall response quality. |
SciVQR: A Multidisciplinary Multimodal Benchmark for Advanced Scientific Reasoning Evaluation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for multimodal large language models fail to capture complexity and traceability of reasoning processes . SciVQR includes domain-specific visuals and challenges models to combine visual comprehension with reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a multimodal benchmark for scientific reasoning covering 54 subfields . SciVQR includes domain-specific visuals and challenges models to combine visual comprehension with reasoning . |
| Outcome: | SciVQR evaluates 54 subfields in mathematics, physics, chemistry, geography, astronomy, and biology . the results highlight the need for improved multi-step reasoning and integration of interdisciplinary knowledge . |
MDTeamGPT: Mitigating Context Collapse and Enabling Self-Evolution in Medical Multi-Agent Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Long, multi-round, multirole interaction trajectories lead to severe information dilution and context window overload, triggering context collapse which destabilizes reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-agent framework that compresses and reorganizes multi-round consensus. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baselines across text-based and multimodal tasks while demonstrating superior diagnostic performance and stability in complex clinical scenarios. |
Thinking-Based Non-Thinking: Solving the Reward Hacking Problem in Training Hybrid Reasoning Models via Reinforcement Learning (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Siyuan Gan, Jiaheng Liu, Boyan Wang, Tianpei Yang, Runqing Miao, Yuyao Zhang, Fanyu Meng, Junlan Feng, Linjian Meng, Jing Huo, Yang Gao
| Challenge: | Existing work on large reasoning models (LRMs) focuses on using reinforcement learning (RL) to train hybrid reasoning models that automatically decide whether to engage in thinking or not based on the complexity of the query. |
| Approach: | They propose to use reinforcement learning to train hybrid reasoning models that automatically decide whether to engage in thinking or not based on the complexity of the query. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model reduces token usage by around 50%$ compared to DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B/7B and DeepScaleR-1.5b, while significantly improving accuracy. |
Can MLLMs Reason Beyond Language? VisReason: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Vision-Centric Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in multimodal large language models demonstrate strong performance on visual reasoning benchmarks. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for vision-centric reasoning that integrates visual and textual information for non-trivial reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark exposes gaps between humans and current MLLMs and reveals limited benefits from test-time reasoning strategies. |