Can MLLMs Reason Beyond Language? VisReason: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Vision-Centric Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in multimodal large language models demonstrate strong performance on visual reasoning benchmarks. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for vision-centric reasoning that integrates visual and textual information for non-trivial reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark exposes gaps between humans and current MLLMs and reveals limited benefits from test-time reasoning strategies. |
Similar Papers
Multimodal Causal Reasoning Benchmark: Challenging Multimodal Large Language Models to Discern Causal Links Across Modalities (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing MLLMs lack robustness in multimodal causal reasoning compared to their performance in textual settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel multimodal chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning benchmark that leverages siamese images and text pairs to challenge MLLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark leverages siamese images and text pairs to challenge MLLMs. |
MultiChartQA: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Multi-Chart Problems (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing chart understanding benchmarks focus on single-chart tasks, neglecting multi-hop reasoning required to extract and integrate information from multiple charts. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates MLLMs’ capabilities in four key areas: direct question answering, parallel question answering and comparative reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates MLLMs’ capabilities in four key areas: direct question answering, parallel question answering and comparative reasoning. |
NTSEBENCH: Cognitive Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language Models (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have demonstrated their strong performance on IQ test questions, achieving high scores across many languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset to evaluate cognitive multimodal reasoning and problem-solving skills of large models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset contains 2,728 multiple-choice questions and 4,642 images spanning 26 categories. |
Probing Audio-Visual Reasoning in Multimodal Language Models through the Lens of Audio (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Kaixiong Gong, Kaituo Feng, Bohao Li, Yibing Wang, Mofan Cheng, Shijia Yang, Jiaming Han, Benyou Wang, Yutong Bai, Zhuoran Yang, Xiangyu Yue
| Challenge: | Recent multimodal large language models lack robust audio-visual integration ability and performance on DeafTest is highly correlated with AV-Odyssey accuracy. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmarking tool that integrates audio-visual reasoning with audio-video cues to infer solutions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on DeafTest, but lacks audio perception in simple audio tasks. |
CausalVLBench: Benchmarking Visual Causal Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large vision-language models have shown impressive ability in various language tasks, especially with their emergent in-context learning capability. |
| Approach: | They propose a causal reasoning benchmark for multi-modal in-context learning from large vision-language models that incorporates visual inputs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on three visual causal reasoning tasks and demonstrates their strengths and weaknesses. |
Beyond Perception: Evaluating Abstract Visual Reasoning through Multi-Stage Task (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing AVR benchmarks focus on single-step reasoning, emphasizing the end result but neglecting the multi-stage nature of reasoning process. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-stage AVR benchmark based on RAVEN to assess reasoning across varying levels of complexity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric considers the correctness of intermediate steps in addition to the final outcomes. |
Probing Logical Reasoning of MLLMs in Scientific Diagrams (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | logical reasoning is key to real-world applications like science education, environmental monitoring, and medical diagnostics. |
| Approach: | They construct visual questions that follow seven structured templates with progressively more complex reasoning involved. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform logical inferences based on visual information. |
ProReason: Multi-Modal Proactive Reasoning with Decoupled Eyesight and Wisdom (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Jingqi Zhou, Sheng Wang, Jingwei Dong, Kai Liu, Lei Li, Jiahui Gao, Jiyue Jiang, Lingpeng Kong, Chuan Wu
| Challenge: | Large vision-language models often prioritize language knowledge over image information on visual reasoning tasks, incurring performance degradation. |
| Approach: | They propose a visual reasoning framework that decouples vision-reasoning capabilities and multi-run proactive perception. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing models on benchmarks for open-source and closed-source models with 13.2% performance gain. |
Mind’s Eye: A Benchmark of Visual Abstraction, Transformation and Composition for Multimodal LLMs (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated compelling visual understanding in recent years. |
| Approach: | They propose a multimodal large language model with eight visuo-cognitive tasks inspired by classic human intelligence tests organized under a novel A–R–T taxonomy: Abstraction, Relation, and Transformation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed frameworks are based on eight visuo-cognitive tasks inspired by human intelligence tests and organized under a novel A–R–T taxonomy: Abstraction, Relation, and Transformation. |
Exploring and Evaluating Multimodal Knowledge Reasoning Consistency of Multimodal Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | MLLMs have achieved significant breakthroughs in understanding across text and vision, but current models still face inconsistencies in reasoning outcomes. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate multimodal large language models using a multimodal knowledge reasoning dataset to examine the extent of consistency degradation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation tasks show that MLLMs are inefficient at integrating knowledge across modalities . |