Papers by Jiaxin Deng
VisPCO: Visual Token Pruning Configuration Optimization via Budget-Aware Pareto-Frontier Learning for Vision-Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for visual token pruning rely on predefined configurations without determining whether they achieve optimal performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that formulates visual token pruning as a Pareto configuration optimization problem to automatically identify optimal configurations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework approximates the empirical Pareto frontier obtained through grid search and generalizes well across pruning methods and VLM architectures. |
GR1: Reinforcement-Enhanced LLM for Geoscience Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yule Xie, Jiaxin Ding, Cheng Deng, Shiqing Gao, Junran Zhang, Sibo Zhang, Zeyuan Wang, Ke Wu, Xin Ding, Luoyi Fu, Meng Jin, Xinbing Wang
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have demonstrated RL's substantial capacity to enhance multi-step reasoning beyond what supervised instruction tuning achieves. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that converts multimodal questions into descriptive text . they propose RL-enhanced geoscience reasoning that can be fine-tuned to a text-only level . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves accuracy and accuracy on multimodal questions while preserving answerability and difficulty. |
Enhancing Transformers for Generalizable First-Order Logical Entailment (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Tianshi Zheng, Jiazheng Wang, Zihao Wang, Jiaxin Bai, Hang Yin, Zheye Deng, Yangqiu Song, Jianxin Li
| Challenge: | Moreover, transformers have demonstrated proficiency in logical reasoning over natural language. |
| Approach: | They propose a logic-aware architecture that improves the performance in generalizable first-order logical entailment by combining distribution shifts and unseen knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed architecture outperforms methods designed specifically for knowledge graph query answering on a dataset with a large dataset. |
From Automation to Autonomy: A Survey on Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are catalyzing a paradigm shift in scientific discovery, evolving from task-specific automation tools into increasingly autonomous agents. |
| Approach: | They introduce a foundational three-level taxonomy to delineate their escalating autonomy and evolving responsibilities within the research lifecycle. |
| Outcome: | The proposed frameworks provide a conceptual architecture and strategic foresight to navigate and shape the future of AI-driven scientific discovery. |
The GaoYao Benchmark: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Multilingual and Multicultural Abilities of Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yilun Liu, Chunguang Zhao, Mengyao Piao, Lingqi Miao, Shimin Tao, Minggui HE, Chenxin Liu, Zhang Li, null Mahongxia, Jiaxin Guo, Chen Liu, Liqun Deng, Jiansheng Wei, Xiaojun Meng, Fanyi Du, Daimeng Wei, Yanghua Xiao
| Challenge: | Existing multilingual evaluation benchmarks neglect cultural nuances and lack language coverage in subjective tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that categorizes evaluation tasks into three cultural layers and nine cognitive sub-layers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses prior coverage by up to 111% on 20+ LLMs. |
OneRec-Think: In-Text Reasoning for Generative Recommendation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zhanyu Liu, Shiyao Wang, Xingmei Wang, Rongzhou Zhang, Jiaxin Deng, Honghui Bao, Jinghao Zhang, Wuchao Li, PengFei Zheng, Xiangyu Wu, Yifei Hu, Qigen Hu, Xinchen Luo, Lejian Ren, Zhang Zixing, Qianqian Wang, Kuo Cai, Yunfan Wu, Hongtao Cheng, Zexuan Cheng, Lu Ren, Huanjie Wang, Yi Su, Ruiming Tang, Kun Gai, Guorui Zhou
| Challenge: | Existing generative models lack the capacity for explicit and controllable reasoning, a key advantage of LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that integrates dialogue, reasoning, and personalized recommendation. |
| Outcome: | Experiments across public benchmarks show state-of-the-art performance. |