Papers by Jianping Li
MiniKV: Pushing the Limits of 2-Bit KV Cache via Compression and System Co-Design for Efficient Long Context Inference (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | State-of-the-art 2-bit KV cache quantization methods achieve excellent results in accelerating LLM inference while retaining accuracy on long context tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a method based on 2-bit KV cache quantization with adaptive KV policies that retain LLM accuracy with only a subset of KV states. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods on a wide range of long context tasks while retaining accuracy. |
Towards Hierarchical Multi-Step Reward Models for Enhanced Reasoning in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Teng Wang, Jiang Zhangyi, Zhenqi He, Hailei Gong, Shenyang Tong, Wenhan Yang, Zeyu Li, Yanan Zheng, Zifan He, Zewen Ye, Shengjie Ma, Jianping Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing Process Reward Models (PRMs) are vulnerable to reward hacking and require expensive, large-scale annotation of reasoning steps. |
| Approach: | They propose a reward model approach which evaluates both individual and consecutive reasoning steps from fine-grained and coarse-grounded level. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that the proposed model performs better than existing PRMs and is more robust than existing models. |
A Unified Sequence Labeling Model for Emotion Cause Pair Extraction (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for emotion-cause pair extraction cannot distinguish emotion-caused pairs from each other . Existing approaches may suffer from possible cascading errors . |
| Approach: | They propose to assign emotion type labels to emotion and cause clauses so that they can be easily distinguished. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can extract multiple emotion-cause pairs in an end-to-end fashion. |
Conditional Causal Relationships between Emotions and Causes in Texts (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on the causal relationships between emotions and causes focus on extracting causally related clauses from documents, but none considers whether context clauses are indispensable for extracted clauses to be causally linked. |
| Approach: | They propose a task to determine whether an input pair of emotion and cause has a valid causal relationship under different contexts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task identifies whether an input pair of emotion and cause has a valid causal relationship under different contexts and then fine-tunes the prediction results based on the characteristics of the input clauses. |
TL-Training: A Task-Feature-Based Framework for Training Large Language Models in Tool Use (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Junjie Ye, Yilong Wu, Sixian Li, Yuming Yang, Zhiheng Xi, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang, Peng Wang, Zhongchao Shi, Jianping Fan, Zhengyin Du
| Challenge: | a new approach to training large language models (LLMs) overlooks task-specific characteristics in tool use, leading to performance bottlenecks. |
| Approach: | They propose a task-feature-based framework that mitigates the effects of suboptimal training data . they use a dataset to train large-scale LLMs and a reward mechanism tailored to error categories . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework matches or surpasses open- and closed-source LLMs in tool-use performance using only 1,217 training data points. |
Analyzing the Effects of Supervised Fine-Tuning on Model Knowledge from Token and Parameter Levels (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Junjie Ye, Yuming Yang, Yang Nan, Shuo Li, Qi Zhang, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang, Peng Wang, Zhongchao Shi, Jianping Fan
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) acquire substantial world knowledge during pretraining, which is further shaped by post-training techniques such as supervised fine-tuning (SFT). |
| Approach: | They evaluate closed-book question answering (CBQA) performance across five LLMs from the LLaMA-2 and LLama-3 families and examine the impact of supervised fine-tuning on model knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performance is 14% worse than models fine-tuned on 1,920 samples and 12% worse on 240 samples. |