Papers by Jiacheng Liang
Watermark under Fire: A Robustness Evaluation of LLM Watermarking (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Various watermarking methods have been proposed to identify LLM-generated texts . lack of unified evaluation platforms has left many critical questions unanswered . |
| Approach: | They systematize existing LLM watermarkers and watermark removal attacks and develop a unified platform that integrates them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed systematizes existing LLM watermarkers and watermark removal attacks, mapping out their design spaces. |
AutoRAN: Automated Hijacking of Safety Reasoning in Large Reasoning Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large reasoning models (LRMs) generate coherent reasoning paths before conclusions, but they introduce new vulnerabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages a weaker but less-aligned model to simulate execution reasoning for initial hijacking attempts and iteratively refines attacks by exploiting reasoning patterns leaked through the target LRM’s refusals. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves 100% success rate within one or few turns, neutralizing reasoning-based defenses even when evaluated by robustly aligned external models. |
ARES: Adaptive Red-Teaming and End-to-End Repair of Policy-Reward System (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jiacheng Liang, Yao Ma, Tharindu Kumarage, Satyapriya Krishna, Rahul Gupta, Kai-Wei Chang, Aram Galstyan, Charith Peris
| Challenge: | Existing red-teaming approaches focus on policy-level weaknesses, but they overlook systemic weaknesses . aRES exploits dual-targeting weaknesses in both the core LLM and the RM simultaneously. |
| Approach: | a new framework uncovers weaknesses in both the core and the reward models simultaneously . a "Safety Mentor" generates semantically coherent adversarial prompts . |
| Outcome: | ARES uncovers weaknesses in both the core LLM and the RM simultaneously . it fine-tunes the LM to detect harmful content, then optimizes the core model . |
An Empirical Study of LLM Reasoning Ability Under Strict Output Length Constraint (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yi Sun, Han Wang, Jiaqiang Li, Jiacheng Liu, Xiangyu Li, Hao Wen, Yizhen Yuan, Huiwen Zheng, Yan Liang, Yuanchun Li, Yunxin Liu
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are a powerful tool for test-time scaling, but they are often used under time constraints. |
| Approach: | They propose to use LLMs to make models think before answering questions . they also use self-correction and best-of-N decoding to encourage deeper thinking . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models are able to achieve higher inference accuracy with extra inference computation under time constraints. |
Data to Defense: The Role of Curation in Aligning Large Language Models Against Safety Compromise (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have identified a vulnerability in large language models (LLMs) during customization. |
| Approach: | They propose an adaptive data curation approach that allows any text to be curated to enhance its effectiveness in counteracting harmful samples during customization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach reduces compromising effects and generates 100% safe responses. |
Enhancing Agentic Textual Graph Retrieval with Synthetic Stepwise Supervision (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ge Chang, Jinbo Su, Jiacheng Liu, Pengfei Yang, Yuhao Shang, Huiwen Zheng, Hongli Ma, Yan Liang, Yuanchun Li, Yunxin Liu
| Challenge: | Existing methods for integrating textual graphs with LLMs are limited by symbolic inference and high annotation costs. |
| Approach: | They propose a textual graph reasoning framework that integrates textual diagrams with large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves 15.6% accuracy and 17.2% in F1 score on three common datasets. |