Papers by Amit Jain
KnowledgePrompts: Exploring the Abilities of Large Language Models to Solve Proportional Analogies via Knowledge-Enhanced Prompting (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Thilini Wijesiriwardene, Ruwan Wickramarachchi, Sreeram Reddy Vennam, Vinija Jain, Aman Chadha, Amitava Das, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, Amit Sheth
| Challenge: | Proportional analogies are used to assess linguistic and cognitive abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset for proportional analogy completion and evaluate its performance in large-scale learning environments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 55% accuracy in knowledge-enhanced prompts. |
YinYang-Align: A new Benchmark for Competing Objectives and Introducing Multi-Objective Preference based Text-to-Image Alignment (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Amitava Das, Yaswanth Narsupalli, Gurpreet Singh, Vinija Jain, Vasu Sharma, Suranjana Trivedy, Aman Chadha, Amit Sheth
| Challenge: | Recent controversies highlight the need for robust alignment mechanisms in text-to-image systems. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate T2I systems across six contradictory alignment objectives . objectives highlight key trade-offs such as artistic freedom and cultural sensitivity . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves superior alignment across all objectives. |
Counter Turing Test (CT2): AI-Generated Text Detection is Not as Easy as You May Think - Introducing AI Detectability Index (ADI) (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Megha Chakraborty, S.M Towhidul Islam Tonmoy, S M Mehedi Zaman, Shreya Gautam, Tanay Kumar, Krish Sharma, Niyar Barman, Chandan Gupta, Vinija Jain, Aman Chadha, Amit Sheth, Amitava Das
| Challenge: | a number of issues have arisen regarding the risk and consequences of AI-generated text detection. |
| Approach: | They propose a counter-turing test to evaluate the robustness of existing AGTD methods . they propose ADI, a quantifiable spectrum to assess detectability of LLMs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method evaluates the robustness of existing AGTD methods . it shows that larger LLMs tend to have lower ADI, indicating they are less detectable . |
On the Relationship between Sentence Analogy Identification and Sentence Structure Encoding in Large Language Models (2024.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
Thilini Wijesiriwardene, Ruwan Wickramarachchi, Aishwarya Naresh Reganti, Vinija Jain, Aman Chadha, Amit Sheth, Amitava Das
| Challenge: | Analogies facilitate the transfer of meaning and knowledge from one domain to another. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models to encode syntactic and semantic structures of sentences to identify sentence analogies. |
| Outcome: | The LLMs which capture syntactic structures better, also have higher abilities in identifying sentence analogies. |
SDS-200: A Swiss German Speech to Standard German Text Corpus (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
Michel Plüss, Manuela Hürlimann, Marc Cuny, Alla Stöckli, Nikolaos Kapotis, Julia Hartmann, Malgorzata Anna Ulasik, Christian Scheller, Yanick Schraner, Amit Jain, Jan Deriu, Mark Cieliebak, Manfred Vogel
| Challenge: | Using a web recording tool, participants were asked to translate their Swiss German text to their own dialect before recording it. |
| Approach: | They present a corpus of Swiss German dialectal speech with Standard German text translations . the dataset allows for training speech translation, dialect recognition, and speech synthesis systems . |
| Outcome: | The dataset allows for training speech translation, dialect recognition, and speech synthesis systems. |
SEPSIS: I Can Catch Your Lies – A New Paradigm for Deception Detection (2025.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
Anku Rani, Dwip Dalal, Shreya Gautam, Pankaj Gupta, Vinija Jain, Aman Chadha, Amit Sheth, Amitava Das
| Challenge: | a new framework categorizes deception into three forms: lies of omission, lies of commission, and lies of influence . a novel framework for deception detection leveraging NLP techniques is proposed . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that categorizes deception into three forms: lies of omission, lies of commission, and lies of influence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves an impressive F1 score of 0.87 across all layers . it can be used to investigate lies of omission, lies of commission and lies of influence . |