Papers by Alison Smith-Renner
An Exploration of Post-Editing Effectiveness in Text Summarization (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
Vivian Lai, Alison Smith-Renner, Ke Zhang, Ruijia Cheng, Wenjuan Zhang, Joel Tetreault, Alejandro Jaimes-Larrarte
| Challenge: | Automated summarization methods are efficient but can suffer from low quality. |
| Approach: | They conducted an experiment with 72 participants to compare post-editing provided summaries with manual summarization for summary quality, human efficiency, and user experience. |
| Outcome: | The results show that post-editing improves summary quality, human efficiency, and user experience on formal (XSum news) and informal (Reddit posts) text. |
Human-Centered Evaluation of Explanations (2022.naacl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
Jordan Boyd-Graber, Samuel Carton, Shi Feng, Q. Vera Liao, Tania Lombrozo, Alison Smith-Renner, Chenhao Tan
| Challenge: | This tutorial will provide an overview of human-centered evaluations of explanations . |
| Approach: | This tutorial will provide an overview of human-centered evaluations of explanations . it will introduce the psychological foundation of explanation and types of NLP explanations. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial will provide an overview of human-centered evaluations of explanations . it will cover the two categories of evaluation: evaluation based on human-annotated explanations and evaluation with human-subjects studies. |
Mapping the Design Space of Human-AI Interaction in Text Summarization (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automated text summarization systems involve humans for preparing data or evaluating model performance, yet, there is no systematic understanding of human-AI interactions and how to design for them. |
| Approach: | They conducted a systematic literature review of 70 papers and designed prototypes for each interaction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed design considerations were based on the results of a systematic literature review of 70 papers and interviews with 16 users. |
Why Didn’t You Listen to Me? Comparing User Control of Human-in-the-Loop Topic Models (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Informed prior-based methods provide better control than constraints, but constraints yield higher quality topics, but with less control. |
| Approach: | They propose to use constraints and informed prior-based methods to improve user control and topic coherence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve user control and topic coherence, while constraints yield higher quality topics, but with less control. |
Harnessing the power of LLMs: Evaluating human-AI text co-creation through the lens of news headline generation (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shattered the ceiling of human-like text generation. |
| Approach: | They compared human-AI interaction types in LLM-assisted news headline generation to determine whether humans can best leverage them for writing. |
| Outcome: | The guiding and selecting model outputs added the most benefit with the lowest cost (in time and effort) Furthermore, AI assistance did not harm participants’ perception of control compared to freeform editing. |