Mapping the Design Space of Human-AI Interaction in Text Summarization (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automated text summarization systems involve humans for preparing data or evaluating model performance, yet, there is no systematic understanding of human-AI interactions and how to design for them. |
| Approach: | They conducted a systematic literature review of 70 papers and designed prototypes for each interaction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed design considerations were based on the results of a systematic literature review of 70 papers and interviews with 16 users. |
Similar Papers
Human-AI Interaction in the Age of LLMs (2024.naacl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the capabilities of AI systems. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will provide an overview of the interaction between humans and Large Language Models (LLMs) it will start with a review of the types of AI models we interact with and walkthrough of the core concepts in Human-AI Interaction. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial will provide an overview of the interaction between humans and LLMs, exploring the challenges, opportunities, and ethical considerations that arise in this dynamic landscape. |
Automatic and Human-AI Interactive Text Generation (with a focus on Text Simplification and Revision) (2024.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this tutorial, we focus on text-to-text generation, a class of natural language generation tasks, that takes a piece of text as input and then generates a revision that is improved according to some specific criteria. |
| Approach: | This tutorial focuses on text-to-text generation, a class of natural language generation tasks that takes a piece of text as input and generates a revision that is improved according to some specific criteria. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial focuses on text-to-text generation, a class of natural language generation tasks, that takes a piece of text as input and generates a revision that is improved according to some specificcriteria. |
What Makes a Good and Useful Summary? Incorporating Users in Automatic Summarization Research (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research on automatic text summarization does not fully align with students’ needs. |
| Approach: | They propose a survey methodology that can be used to investigate the needs of users of automatically generated summaries. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can be easily adjusted to investigate different user groups. |
Responsible AI Considerations in Text Summarization Research: A Review of Current Practices (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study examines research and reporting practices for text summarization tasks . text summaries are often overlooked by the responsible AI community . |
| Approach: | They examine research and reporting practices in the context of text summarization . they find that relatively few papers engage with possible stakeholders . |
| Outcome: | The findings highlight current research practices and provide recommendations on research directions. |
Controllable Text Summarization: Unraveling Challenges, Approaches, and Prospects - A Survey (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | scholarly attention has turned to the development of text summarization methods that are more closely tailored and controlled to align with specific objectives and user needs. |
| Approach: | They formalize a controllable text summarization task and categorize controllability attributes according to their shared characteristics and objectives. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is tailored to meet the specific intent and needs of users. |
An Exploration of Post-Editing Effectiveness in Text Summarization (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
Vivian Lai, Alison Smith-Renner, Ke Zhang, Ruijia Cheng, Wenjuan Zhang, Joel Tetreault, Alejandro Jaimes-Larrarte
| Challenge: | Automated summarization methods are efficient but can suffer from low quality. |
| Approach: | They conducted an experiment with 72 participants to compare post-editing provided summaries with manual summarization for summary quality, human efficiency, and user experience. |
| Outcome: | The results show that post-editing improves summary quality, human efficiency, and user experience on formal (XSum news) and informal (Reddit posts) text. |
SummHelper: Collaborative Human-Computer Summarization (2023.emnlp-demo)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches for text summarization are mostly automated, with limited space for human intervention and control. |
| Approach: | They propose a 2-phase summarization assistant that facilitates human-machine collaboration . it suggests possible content and generates a coherent summary from these selections . authors hope to improve the efficiency of the computer and human-involved approach . |
| Outcome: | The proposed summarization assistant is a 2-phase summarizing assistant . it suggests potential content and consolidates the output with visual mappings . the proposed system is available for free on youtube . |
Neural Text Summarization: A Critical Evaluation (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current approaches to text summarization use advanced attention and copying mechanisms, multi-task and multi-reward training techniques. |
| Approach: | They evaluate datasets, evaluation metrics, and models for text summarization . they highlight three primary shortcomings: 1) datasets leave task underconstrained; 2) models overfit layout biases . |
| Outcome: | The current evaluation protocol is weakly correlated with human judgment and does not account for factual correctness. |
What Have We Achieved on Text Summarization? (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for text summarization have been investigated, but there are still gaps between them and human professionals. |
| Approach: | They analyze 8 major sources of errors on 10 representative summarization models manually. |
| Outcome: | Aiming to gain more understanding of summarization systems with respect to their strengths and limitations on a fine-grained syntactic and semantic level, we use 8 major sources of errors on 10 representative summarizing models. |
AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation (2026.eacl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial provides an overview of recent advances in AI-assisted tools and models that support and enhance the scientific research process. |
| Approach: | This tutorial provides an overview of recent advances in AI-assisted tools and models that support and enhance the scientific research process. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial provides an overview of recent advances in AI-assisted tools and models that support and enhance the scientific research process. |