Papers by Ailin Huang
PaCoRe: Learning to Scale Test-Time Compute with Parallel Coordinated Reasoning (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jingcheng Hu, Yinmin Zhang, Shijie Shang, Xiaobo Yang, Yue Peng, Zhewei Huang, Hebin Zhou, Xin Wu, Jie Cheng, Fanqi Wan, Xiangwen Kong, Chengyuan Yao, Kaiwen Yan, Ailin Huang, Hongyu Zhou, Qi Han, Zheng Ge, Xiangyu Zhang, Heung-Yeung Shum
| Challenge: | Parallel Coordinated Reasoning (PaCoRe) overcomes a central limitation of contemporary language models: their inability to scale test-time compute (TTC) far beyond sequential reasoning under a fixed context window. |
| Approach: | They propose a training-and-inference framework to overcome a central limitation of language models: their inability to scale test-time compute (TTC) under a fixed context window. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model scales to multi-million-token effective TTC without exceeding context limits. |
Intrinsic Model Weaknesses: How Priming Attacks Unveil Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have significant impact on various industries and societal functions due to advanced instruction-following capabilities. |
| Approach: | They developed and tested novel attack strategies on popular LLMs to expose their vulnerabilities in generating harmful content. |
| Outcome: | The proposed attacks achieved an ASR of 100% on open-source models, including Meta’s Llama-3.2, Google’s Gemma-2, Mistral’s Mistral-NeMo, Falcon’s Falcon-mamba, Apple’s DCLM, Microsoft’s Phi3, and Qwen’s Qwend2.5, among others. |
Path Drift in Large Reasoning Models: How First-Person Commitments Override Safety (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on prompt injection and jailbreak attacks primarily target the surface structure of input prompts. |
| Approach: | They propose a three-stage approach to mitigate the risk of Long-CoT reasoning drift . they propose 'path-level defense' strategy that incorporates role attribution correction and metacognitive reflection . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reduces refusal rates and ethical evaporation, while ethical escalation and layered disclaimers progressively steer models toward unsafe completions. |