Automatic Grammatical Error Correction for Sequence-to-sequence Text Generation: An Empirical Study (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Sequence-to-sequence (seq2sequ) models have a weakness: they cannot always generate sentences without grammatical errors. |
| Approach: | They propose to use automatic grammatical error correction to improve seq2seq models . they conduct experiments on machine translation, formality style transfer, sentence compression and simplification . |
| Outcome: | The proposed system can improve grammaticality of generated text and improve formal style tasks. |
Similar Papers
Improving Grammatical Error Correction Models with Purpose-Built Adversarial Examples (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for grammatical error correction are data-hungry and it is hard to train a seq2seq model with good performance without suf-Clean. |
| Approach: | They propose a method inspired by adversarial training to generate more meaningful and valuable training examples by continually identifying weak spots of a model and to enhance the model by gradually adding adversarials to the training set. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves generalization and robustness of GEC models by adding adversarial examples to the training set. |
Wronging a Right: Generating Better Errors to Improve Grammatical Error Detection (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | grammatical error correction is a labor-intensive task that requires large amounts of training data. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a human-annotated corpus of human-generated grammatical errors to generate a synthetic model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms the current state of the art in grammatical error correction . human annotators achieve 39.39 F1 scores, suggesting the model generates mostly human-like instances . |
Multi-pass Decoding for Grammatical Error Correction (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Seq2edit models decode only once without aware of subsequent tokens. |
| Approach: | They propose to iteratively refine the correction results of seq2seq models via Multi-Pass Decoding (MPD) to improve performance, but MPD increases inference costs . they propose to merge the source input and previous round correction result into one sequence. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on the CoNLL-14 and BEA-19 test set show that the proposed approach improves over baselines. |
Text Generation with Text-Editing Models (2022.naacl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
Eric Malmi, Yue Dong, Jonathan Mallinson, Aleksandr Chuklin, Jakub Adamek, Daniil Mirylenka, Felix Stahlberg, Sebastian Krause, Shankar Kumar, Aliaksei Severyn
| Challenge: | Text-editing models are a popular alternative to seq2seq for monolingual text generation tasks such as text summarization and style transfer. |
| Approach: | They propose to use text-editing models to predict edit operations applied to the source sequence and to generate outputs word-by-word from scratch. |
| Outcome: | This paper provides an overview of the text-edit based models and their current state-of-the-art approaches. |
Fluency Boost Learning and Inference for Neural Grammatical Error Correction (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Seq2seq models for grammatical error correction (GEC) have two limitations: (1) a seq2q model may not be well generalized with only limited error-corrected data; (2) a model may fail to completely correct a sentence with multiple errors through normal seq1sequeq inference. |
| Approach: | They propose a fluency boost learning and inference mechanism to improve the performance of seq2seq models for grammatical error correction (GEC) by generating fluency-boost sentence pairs during training. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that the proposed model improves on both CoNLL-2014 and JFLEG benchmark datasets. |
Efficient Grammatical Error Correction Via Multi-Task Training and Optimized Training Schedule (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent research has focused on using synthetic data for grammatical error correction . lack of annotated training data hinders progress in the field . |
| Approach: | They propose auxiliary tasks that exploit alignment between original and corrected sentences . they propose a sequence-to-sequence problem and perform multi-task training . |
| Outcome: | The proposed auxiliary tasks outperform the best models with a BART-based model on 11B parameters. |
Improving Seq2Seq Grammatical Error Correction via Decoding Interventions (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to grammatical error correction (GEC) are sequence-to-sequence and sequence-edit. |
| Approach: | They propose a unified decoding intervention framework that employs an external critic to assess the appropriateness of the token to be generated incrementally. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baselines and state-of-the-art methods on English and Chinese datasets. |
Grammatical Error Correction: Are We There Yet? (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | grammatical error correction (GEC) systems outperform humans on the CoNLL-2014 test set, but there are still classes of errors that they fail to correct. |
| Approach: | They found that state-of-the-art GEC systems outperform humans by a wide margin on the CoNLL-2014 test set . however, they found that there are still classes of errors that they fail to correct . |
| Outcome: | The F0.5 evaluation metric outperforms the CoNLL-2014 test set, but there are still classes of errors that they fail to correct. |
To Err Is Human, but Llamas Can Learn It Too (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Specifically, we fine-tune Llama 2 LMs for error generation and find that this approach yields synthetic errors akin to human errors. |
| Approach: | They propose to fine-tune Llama 2 LMs for error generation and train GEC Llma models using these artificial errors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art models with gains ranging between 0.8 and 6 F0.5 points across all languages tested. |
TemplateGEC: Improving Grammatical Error Correction with Detection Template (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for grammatical error correction (GEC) have been developed. |
| Approach: | They propose a method which integrates the detection labels from a Seq2Edit model to construct a template as the input. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can perform human-in-the-loop error correction tasks. |