Wronging a Right: Generating Better Errors to Improve Grammatical Error Detection (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | grammatical error correction is a labor-intensive task that requires large amounts of training data. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a human-annotated corpus of human-generated grammatical errors to generate a synthetic model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms the current state of the art in grammatical error correction . human annotators achieve 39.39 F1 scores, suggesting the model generates mostly human-like instances . |
Similar Papers
Automatic Grammatical Error Correction for Sequence-to-sequence Text Generation: An Empirical Study (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Sequence-to-sequence (seq2sequ) models have a weakness: they cannot always generate sentences without grammatical errors. |
| Approach: | They propose to use automatic grammatical error correction to improve seq2seq models . they conduct experiments on machine translation, formality style transfer, sentence compression and simplification . |
| Outcome: | The proposed system can improve grammaticality of generated text and improve formal style tasks. |
To Err Is Human, but Llamas Can Learn It Too (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Specifically, we fine-tune Llama 2 LMs for error generation and find that this approach yields synthetic errors akin to human errors. |
| Approach: | They propose to fine-tune Llama 2 LMs for error generation and train GEC Llma models using these artificial errors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art models with gains ranging between 0.8 and 6 F0.5 points across all languages tested. |
Improving Grammatical Error Correction via Contextual Data Augmentation (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Increasing use of synthetic data due to inconsistent error distribution and noisy labels is limiting the use of these data. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for augmentation of synthetic data with a more consistent error distribution. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms strong baselines and achieves state-of-the-art with only a few synthetic data. |
Improved grammatical error correction by ranking elementary edits (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new study shows that grammatical error correction models are far from perfect for English . reranking allows for a better classification of edits, but it can be difficult for other languages . |
| Approach: | They propose a two-stage reranking method for grammatical error correction using a model as edit generator and a sequence labeling model as second step. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method surpasses existing methods on BEA 2019 English dataset by 2-3%. |
Improving Grammatical Error Correction with Machine Translation Pairs (2020.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to generate error-corrected sentence pairs for improving grammatical error correction are not available. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to generate error-corrected sentence pairs for improving grammatical error correction based on machine translation models of different qualities . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can generate multiple error-corrected sentence pairs from Chinese to English text. |
Adversarial Grammatical Error Correction (2020.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that adversarial-GEC can achieve competitive GEC quality compared to NMT-based baselines. |
| Approach: | They propose an adversarial approach to Grammatical Error Correction using a transformer-based model and a sentence-pair classification model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves competitive GEC quality compared to baselines. |
Low-Resource Grammatical Error Correction: Selective Data Augmentation with Round-Trip Machine Translation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for grammatical error correction require large amounts of parallel training data. |
| Approach: | They propose to generate synthetic data through round-trip machine translation by generating a set of character-level errors using a technique known as SeLex-RT. |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique produces errors similar to those observed with language learners, but lacks gold-labeled training data. |
Improving Grammatical Error Correction Models with Purpose-Built Adversarial Examples (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for grammatical error correction are data-hungry and it is hard to train a seq2seq model with good performance without suf-Clean. |
| Approach: | They propose a method inspired by adversarial training to generate more meaningful and valuable training examples by continually identifying weak spots of a model and to enhance the model by gradually adding adversarials to the training set. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves generalization and robustness of GEC models by adding adversarial examples to the training set. |
Grammatical Error Correction: Are We There Yet? (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | grammatical error correction (GEC) systems outperform humans on the CoNLL-2014 test set, but there are still classes of errors that they fail to correct. |
| Approach: | They found that state-of-the-art GEC systems outperform humans by a wide margin on the CoNLL-2014 test set . however, they found that there are still classes of errors that they fail to correct . |
| Outcome: | The F0.5 evaluation metric outperforms the CoNLL-2014 test set, but there are still classes of errors that they fail to correct. |
Grammatical error detection in transcriptions of spoken English (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | CrowdED corpus of spoken English monologues on business topics was crowdsourced from native speakers of English and learners of English with German as their first language. |
| Approach: | They propose to use the corpus recordings to correct existing speech transcriptions and edit them to make them more fluent. |
| Outcome: | The proposed transcription corrections and annotations can be used for automatic transcription post-editing and grammatical error correction for spoken English. |