A Resource-Free Evaluation Metric for Cross-Lingual Word Embeddings Based on Graph Modularity (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Cross-lingual word embeddings encode the meaning of words from different languages into a shared low-dimensional space. |
| Approach: | They show that modularity can be used to improve unsupervised word embeddings . they show that it is useful for low-resource languages where one often has few bilingual pairs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves unsupervised cross-lingual word embeddings on distant language pairs in low-resource settings. |
Similar Papers
Evaluating Word Embeddings with Categorical Modularity (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing word embeddings use different bilingual supervision signals with varying levels of strength. |
| Approach: | They propose a graph modularity metric to measure word embedding quality . they use a set of 500 words belonging to 59 neurobiologically motivated semantic categories . |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric measures word embedding quality on monolingual and cross-lingual tasks. |
Analyzing the Limitations of Cross-lingual Word Embedding Mappings (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for cross-lingual word embeddings have limited results . existing methods require little or no cross-linguistic signal to work . |
| Approach: | They compare offline mapping methods to an extension of skip-gram that jointly learns both embedding spaces. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method yields more isomorphic embeddings, is less sensitive to hubness, and achieves stronger results in bilingual lexicon induction. |
On the Robustness of Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Cross-lingual Word Embedding Learning (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Cross-lingual word embeddings are vector representations of words in different languages where words with similar meaning are represented by similar vectors, regardless of the language. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate multiple cross-lingual word embedding models and compare their strengths and limitations to evaluate their effectiveness. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform well with noisy text and language pairs with major differences. |
On the Correlation of Word Embedding Evaluation Metrics (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Word embeddings are geometrical representations of word paradigmatics and syntagmatics. |
| Approach: | They propose to investigate evaluation metrics on various datasets to find correlations . they propose a fast solution to select the best word embeddings among many others . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method could be used to select the best word embeddings among many others. |
A Closer Look on Unsupervised Cross-lingual Word Embeddings Mapping (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for word embeddings are limited to a single, unannotated corpus, which means that word representations with similar meaning in distinct languages can be very different. |
| Approach: | They propose an unsupervised method for cross-lingual word embedding mapping that uses stochastic initialization and isometric initialization to verify the method's robustness. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is robust on different embedding representations and new language pairs, particularly those involving Slavic languages like Polish or Czech. |
CLUSE: Cross-Lingual Unsupervised Sense Embeddings (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for learning bilingual sense embeddings that encode semantics are weak for recognizing multi-sense word representations . elucidation of word embeddables is difficult because they do not allow a word to have different meanings in different contexts. |
| Approach: | They propose a sense induction and representation learning model that learns bilingual sense embeddings that align well in the vector space. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model shows that the learned embeddings are aligned well in the vector space. |
How to (Properly) Evaluate Cross-Lingual Word Embeddings: On Strong Baselines, Comparative Analyses, and Some Misconceptions (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Cross-lingual word embeddings (CLEs) are used for downstream NLP tasks . CLEs are based on bilingual lexicon induction (BLI) evaluations vary greatly, hindering ability to interpret performance and properties of different CLE models. |
| Approach: | They evaluate CLE models for a large number of language pairs on bilingual lexicon induction and three downstream tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performance is based on supervised and unsupervised models on bilingual lexicon induction and three downstream tasks. |
Unsupervised Cross-Lingual Representation Learning (P19-4)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a comprehensive survey of cutting-edge weakly-supervised and unsupervised cross-lingual word representations is presented . |
| Approach: | This tutorial provides a comprehensive survey of recent work on weakly-supervised and unsupervised cross-lingual word representations. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial provides a comprehensive survey of cutting-edge weakly-supervised and unsupervised word representations. |
Non-Linearity in Mapping Based Cross-Lingual Word Embeddings (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on cross-lingual word embeddings rely on linear mappings, but this assumption is not true for all language pairs. |
| Approach: | They propose a non-linear mapping approach which can find non-linesar relationships between languages by kernel Canonical Correlation Analysis. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves on five language pairs on supervised and self-learning scenarios. |
Unsupervised Cross-lingual Transfer of Word Embedding Spaces (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for cross-lingual word mapping require cross-linguistic supervision, but this is not available for many low resource languages. |
| Approach: | They propose an unsupervised method that learns transformation functions over corresponding word embedding spaces using a distributed distributional matching algorithm. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method performs better on bilingual lexicon induction and cross-lingual word similarity prediction datasets than other supervised and unsupervised methods. |