We Need to Talk about Standard Splits (P19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to evaluate systems with a held-out test set are insufficient for system comparison.
Approach: They propose to use multiple random splits to compare performance of systems . they replicate results on standard split but fail to reproduce some rankings .
Outcome: The proposed method is based on multiple random splits to replicate results with a set of part-of-speech taggers.

Similar Papers

Is the Best Better? Bayesian Statistical Model Comparison for Natural Language Processing (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a recent study raises concerns about the use of standard splits to compare models . we compare the performance of six English part-of-speech taggers to those of other models based on standard split analysis .
Approach: They propose a Bayesian statistical model comparison technique using k-fold cross-validation . they rank six English part-of-speech taggers across two data sets and three evaluation metrics .
Outcome: The proposed method ranks English part-of-speech taggers on two data sets and three evaluation metrics.
We Need To Talk About Random Splits (2021.eacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: argued that random splits, like standard splits lead to overly optimistic performance estimates.
Approach: They argue that random splits, like standard splits lead to overly optimistic performance estimates.
Outcome: The proposed method leads to more realistic performance estimates than standard splits.
We Need to Talk About train-dev-test Splits (2021.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Standard train-dev-test splits used to benchmark multiple models are now used in NLP . comparing multiple versions of the same model on the test data leads to overfitting and "expiration" of test sets.
Approach: They propose to use a tune-set when developing neural network methods to do model picking.
Outcome: The proposed model picker is more robust against the evaluated hyperparameter ranges than the standard split split.
How Bad are PoS Tagger in Cross-Corpora Settings? Evaluating Annotation Divergence in the UD Project. (N19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Using annotation variation principles, Part-of-Speech tagging performance degrades when applied to test sentences that depart from training data.
Approach: They propose to use the annotation variation principle to identify inconsistencies between annotations . they also evaluate their impact on prediction performance .
Outcome: The proposed method can detect errors in gold standard annotations and improve prediction performance.
Split and Rephrase: Better Evaluation and Stronger Baselines (P18-2)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a dataset mapping a complex sentence to a sequence of sentences conveying the same meaning is challenging in NLP.
Approach: They propose a neural split and a copy-mechanism to break a complex sentence into several shorter sentences that convey the same meaning.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms the baseline model by 8.68 BLEU and further improves on the task.
Benchmarking Long-tail Generalization with Likelihood Splits (2023.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to test out of distribution generalization have their own strengths and weaknesses.
Approach: They propose a method to create challenging benchmarks that require generalizing to the tail of the distribution by re-splitting existing datasets.
Outcome: The proposed approach can be customized to construct meaningful splits for a wide range of tasks.
Please, Don’t Forget the Difference and the Confidence Interval when Seeking for the State-of-the-Art Status (2022.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: comparing NLP systems by performance has become an essential question . comparing systems by performing performance criterion is criticized for allowing chance to determine superiority .
Approach: They propose to use bootstrap confidence intervals instead of state-of-the-art status and statistical significance testing to compare NLP system performance.
Outcome: The bootstrap confidence intervals are used to compare NLP system performance . the bootstrap test is more accurate than state-of-the-art status and statistical significance testing .
Rethinking RL Evaluation: Can Benchmarks Truly Reveal Failures of RL Methods? (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks for reinforcement learning for large language models do not accurately assess generalization.
Approach: They propose three core principles for designing more faithful benchmarks: sufficient difficulty, balanced evaluation, and distributional robustness.
Outcome: The proposed benchmarks do not accurately assess generalization across distribution shifts, difficulty levels, and counterfactual scenarios.
What Will it Take to Fix Benchmarking in Natural Language Understanding? (2021.naacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Evaluation for many natural language understanding (NLU) tasks is broken due to unreliable and biased systems scoring so high on standard benchmarks.
Approach: They argue that current benchmarks fail at four criteria for evaluation . they argue that adversarial data collection does not address the causes of failures .
Outcome: The proposed frameworks fail at four criteria, and adversarial data collection does not address the causes of these failures, the authors argue . restoring a healthy evaluation ecosystem will require significant progress in the design of benchmark datasets, reliability with which they are annotated, their size, and the ways they handle social bias.
Splits! Flexible Sociocultural Linguistic Investigation at Scale (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Variation in language use offers a rich lens into cultural perspectives, values, and opinions.
Approach: They propose to construct a "sandbox" for systematic and flexible sociolinguistic research by splitting a reddit dataset into demographically/topically split SLPs.
Outcome: The proposed method analyzes a demographically/topically split Reddit dataset validated by self-identification and replicating several known SLPs from existing literature.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations