Challenge: Evaluation for many natural language understanding (NLU) tasks is broken due to unreliable and biased systems scoring so high on standard benchmarks.
Approach: They argue that current benchmarks fail at four criteria for evaluation . they argue that adversarial data collection does not address the causes of failures .
Outcome: The proposed frameworks fail at four criteria, and adversarial data collection does not address the causes of these failures, the authors argue . restoring a healthy evaluation ecosystem will require significant progress in the design of benchmark datasets, reliability with which they are annotated, their size, and the ways they handle social bias.

Similar Papers

Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understanding (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a new large-scale NLI benchmark dataset is presented to test models on a variety of popular NLIs.
Approach: They propose a large-scale NLI benchmark dataset that is iteratively compared with a human-and-model-in-the-loop procedure.
Outcome: The proposed method can be applied in a never-ending learning scenario, becoming a moving target for NLU, rather than a static benchmark that will quickly saturate.
Targeting the Benchmark: On Methodology in Current Natural Language Processing Research (2021.acl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a language benchmark is a task devised that is restricted enough to be managable with current methods, but is deemed challenging enough to serve as a benchmark.
Approach: They propose to use a language task as a benchmark and a baseline model to argue it is challenging enough to be a good one.
Outcome: The proposed language benchmarks are based on a dataset and a language task . the proposed benchmarks can be used to measure progress towards the goal of the research .
A Tutorial on Evaluation Metrics used in Natural Language Generation (2021.naacl-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: This tutorial presents the evolution of automatic evaluation metrics to their current state along with emerging trends in this field.
Approach: This tutorial presents the evolution of automatic evaluation metrics to their current state . it aims to assess the extent of scientific progress made and identify areas/components that need improvement .
Outcome: This tutorial presents the evolution of automatic evaluation metrics to their current state along with emerging trends in this field.
In Benchmarks We Trust ... Or Not? (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks for Large Language Models (LLMs) are inadequate and lack a clear solution.
Approach: They propose checklists to cover all aspects of benchmarking issues, both for benchmark creation and usage.
Outcome: The proposed checklists cover all aspects of benchmarking issues, both for benchmark creation and usage.
FewNLU: Benchmarking State-of-the-Art Methods for Few-Shot Natural Language Understanding (2022.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation protocols for few-shot natural language understanding (NLU) tasks are inconsistent and hinder fair comparison and measuring progress.
Approach: They propose an evaluation framework that improves previous evaluation procedures in three key aspects, i.e., test performance, dev-test correlation, and stability.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves evaluation procedures in three key aspects, i.e., performance, dev-test correlation, and stability.
Navigating the Modern Evaluation Landscape: Considerations in Benchmarks and Frameworks for Large Language Models (LLMs) (2024.lrec-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: General-purpose Language Models have changed the world of Natural Language Processing, if not the world itself.
Approach: This tutorial will lay the foundations and explain the basics of evaluation and compare traditional methods to newly developed methods.
Outcome: The tutorial assumes little familiarity with metrics, datasets, prompts and benchmarks . it will compare traditional methods to newly developed methods .
MENLI: Robust Evaluation Metrics from Natural Language Inference (2023.tacl-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent proposed BERT-based evaluation metrics for text generation are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, e.g., relating to information correctness.
Approach: They propose to use BERT-based evaluation metrics for text generation to evaluate text for semantic similarity but are vulnerable to adversarial attacks using Natural Language Inference.
Outcome: The proposed metrics outperform existing summarization metrics but perform below SOTA MT metrics on standard benchmarks.
Deconstructing NLG Evaluation: Evaluation Practices, Assumptions, and Their Implications (2022.naacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Evaluating natural language generation systems is difficult, as there are many ways to express similar things in text.
Approach: They combine interviews with NLG practitioners to examine ethical considerations and their implications for NLG evaluation.
Outcome: The findings of the study surface goals, community practices, assumptions, and constraints that shape NLG evaluations, and examine their implications and how they embody ethical considerations.
A guide to the dataset explosion in QA, NLI, and commonsense reasoning (2020.coling-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a tutorial aims to provide an up-to-date guide to the recent datasets . the target audience is the NLP practitioners who are lost in dozens of the recent data sets.
Approach: This tutorial provides an up-to-date guide to the recent datasets . it surveys old and new methodological issues with dataset construction .
Outcome: This tutorial aims to provide an up-to-date guide to the recent datasets . it surveys the old and new methodological issues with dataset construction .
JGLUE: Japanese General Language Understanding Evaluation (2022.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: There is no benchmark for Japanese to evaluate and analyze NLU ability from different perspectives.
Approach: They build a Japanese NLU benchmark from scratch without translation to measure general NLU ability in Japanese.
Outcome: a Japanese NLU benchmark is built from scratch without translation to measure general NLU ability in Japanese.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations