| Challenge: | Existing approaches to event detection require annotated triggers and event types in training data. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that encodes the representation of a sentence based on target event types. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves competitive performances compared with state-of-the-art methods. |
Similar Papers
Event Detection with Trigger-Aware Lattice Neural Network (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Event detection is a key part of event extraction, but there are two issues with word-based models in languages without natural delimiters, such as Chinese. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that can solve the problem of word- trigger mismatch . they also use an external knowledge base to model polysemous characters and words . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art methods on two benchmark datasets and outperformed previous state- of-the art methods significantly. |
Treasures Outside Contexts: Improving Event Detection via Global Statistics (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing neural-based ED models are confused by changeable contexts during testing . we propose a system that extracts statistical event features from word-event cooccurrence frequencies . |
| Approach: | They propose to integrate a set of statistical event features from word-event co-occurrence frequencies into the training set to cooperate with contextual features. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms ten strong baselines on ACE2005 and KBP2015 datasets. |
Saliency as Evidence: Event Detection with Trigger Saliency Attribution (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to ED see no differences between event types and use a single model to address them all. |
| Approach: | They propose a new concept termed trigger salience attribution which can explicitly quantify the underlying patterns of events. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can distinguish between trigger-dependent and context-dependent types and achieve promising performance on two benchmarks. |
Learning with Partial Annotations for Event Detection (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Event detection (ED) requires fully labeled and high-quality training data. |
| Approach: | They propose a new trigger localization formulation using contrastive learning to distinguish ground-truth triggers from contexts and show a decent robustness for addressing partial annotation noise. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves an F1 score of over 60% in an extreme scenario where 90% of events are unlabeled. |
Adversarial Training for Weakly Supervised Event Detection (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Detecting and identifying events is an important subtask of event extraction. |
| Approach: | They build a large event-related candidate set with good coverage and apply an adversarial training mechanism to iteratively identify informative instances from the candidate set and filter out those noisy ones. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods on two real-world datasets. |
How Does Context Matter? On the Robustness of Event Detection with Context-Selective Mask Generalization (2020.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies focus on improving the overall performance of an ED model, but few consider the robustness of an existing model. |
| Approach: | They propose a new training mechanism that can effectively mine context-specific patterns for learning and robustify an ED model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can learn a complementary predictive bias with most ED models that use full context for feature learning. |
Trigger-Argument based Explanation for Event Detection (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing works on ED use words or phrases to explain models’ inner mechanisms, but for ED, the event structure is more enlightening clues to explain model behaviors. |
| Approach: | They propose a Trigger-Argument based Explanation method which can utilize event structure knowledge to uncover a faithful interpretation for existing ED models at neuron level. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can reveal the process by which the model predicts on the large-scale MAVEN and the widely-used ACE 2005 datasets. |
Improving Event Detection via Open-domain Trigger Knowledge (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for event detecting are prone to overfitting densely labeled trigger words due to the small scale of training data. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel Enrichment Knowledge Distillation model to leverage external open-domain trigger knowledge to reduce in-built biases to frequent trigger words in annotations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms nine strong baselines and is especially effective for unseen/sparsely labeled trigger words. |
Improving Event Definition Following For Zero-Shot Event Detection (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zefan Cai, Po-Nien Kung, Ashima Suvarna, Mingyu Ma, Hritik Bansal, Baobao Chang, P. Jeffrey Brantingham, Wei Wang, Nanyun Peng
| Challenge: | Existing approaches on zero-shot event detection train models on datasets annotated with known event types and prompt them with unseen event definitions. |
| Approach: | They propose to train models to better follow event definitions by using an automatic generated Diverse Event Definition dataset. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on three open benchmarks on zero-shot event detection. |
Extending Event Detection to New Types with Learning from Keywords (D19-55)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for event detection classify words or phrases into specific types of interest. |
| Approach: | They propose a new event detection formulation that describes types via keywords to match contexts in documents. |
| Outcome: | The proposed formulation improves the performance of the proposed model to new types. |