| Challenge: | Recent studies in natural language processing (NLP) have shown that the language of opinion holders and their patterns of interaction play a key role in changing the mind of a reader. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a dataset to study the effect of language use vs. prior beliefs on persuasion in a controlled setting that takes into account political and religious ideology. |
| Outcome: | The proposed controlled setting takes into account political and religious ideology and shows that prior beliefs play a more important role than language use effects. |
Similar Papers
Prior Beliefs Prejudice LLM-as-Judge: Evidence from Persuasion Evaluation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models are increasingly used as judges to evaluate text quality, content and assess arguments. |
| Approach: | They propose to exploit belief-conditioned rating inflation by using persuasion-based probing to examine persuasive arguments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model fails to evaluate persuasive arguments based on belief alignment . the model fails in three of the three tasks, with belief-conditioned rating inflation accounting for 88% of cases. |
Context versus Prior Knowledge in Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have investigated how often a model will rely on prior knowledge over conflicting contextual information in answering questions. |
| Approach: | They propose two mutual information-based metrics to measure a model’s dependency on a context and on its prior about an entity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metrics show that language models can integrate prior knowledge and new information in a predictable way across different questions and contexts. |
PrimeX: A Dataset of Worldview, Opinion, and Explanation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work shows that an individual's worldview -or beliefs about the overall character of the world -can explain persistent behavioral patterns and correlates with personality, well-being, political, religious, and demographic variables. |
| Approach: | They develop a dataset of public opinion survey data from 858 US residents with written explanations from the respondents for why they hold specific opinions and the Primal World Belief survey for assessing respondent worldview. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to better represent an individual's belief system and improve opinion prediction. |
Exploring the Role of Argument Structure in Online Debate Persuasion (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work in NLP has shown that linguistic features extracted from debate text and features encoding the characteristics of the audience are both critical in persuasion studies. |
| Approach: | They propose to incorporate argument structure features into an LSTM-based model to assess the persuasiveness of debates. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model incorporates argument structure features to predict debaters that make the most convincing arguments on online debate forums. |
Offer a Different Perspective: Modeling the Belief Alignment of Arguments in Multi-party Debates (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on persuasion in online forums focuses on identifying debate winners and winning negotiation games. |
| Approach: | They adopt a hierarchical generative Variational Autoencoder model to model winning arguments . they propose competing hypotheses about the nature of argumentation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model predicts winning arguments in reddit debates . it uses a hierarchical generative Variational Autoencoder to model argumentation . |
The Role of Pragmatic and Discourse Context in Determining Argument Impact (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work shows that attributes of both the audience and communicator constitute important cues for determining argument strength. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a dataset to study the pragmatic and discourse context of argumentative claims to build predictive models that incorporate the pragmatic context of the argument. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models outperform models that rely on claim-specific linguistic features for predicting the perceived impact of individual claims within a particular line of argument. |
Detecting Winning Arguments with Large Language Models and Persuasion Strategies (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have focused on predicting winning arguments, i.e., those that effectively convince a reader to adopt a certain opinion. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models with a chain-of-thought framework to guide reasoning over six persuasion strategies to determine persuasiveness. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach leverages large language models with a chain-of-thought framework that guides reasoning over six persuasion strategies. |
How Persuasive Is Your Context? (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Empirically, through aseries of experiments, we show that TPS captures a more nuanced notion of persuasiveness than previously proposed metrics. |
| Approach: | They introduce a targeted persuasion score to quantify how persuasive a given context is to an LM. |
| Outcome: | Empirically, the proposed model captures a more nuanced notion of persuasiveness than previously proposed metrics. |
On the Interaction of Belief Bias and Explanations (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to evaluate explainability fail to account for belief biases affecting human performance . previous studies have shown that neural models can make confident predictions relying on artifacts . |
| Approach: | They propose to account for belief bias in explainability by using models of varying quality and adversarial examples. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods show that results change when using models of varying quality and adversarial examples. |
A Corpus for Modeling User and Language Effects in Argumentation on Online Debating (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing argumentation datasets have allowed only limited assessment of "user" traits because information on background of users is generally unavailable. |
| Approach: | They present a dataset of 78,376 debates generated over a 10-year period along with surprisingly comprehensive participant profiles. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset includes 78,376 debates generated over a 10-year period along with comprehensive participant profiles. |