MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distance (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics are not capable of evaluating text quality. |
| Approach: | They propose a metric that compares system output against reference texts based on semantics rather than surface forms. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric shows a high correlation with human judgment of text quality on a number of text generation tasks. |
Similar Papers
Automatic Text Evaluation through the Lens of Wasserstein Barycenters (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | metric BaryScore is used to evaluate text generation based on deep contextualized embeddings. |
| Approach: | They propose to model the layer output of deep contextualized embeddings as a probability distribution rather than a vector embeddable layer. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric outperforms other BERT based metrics and exhibits more consistent behaviour in particular for text summarization. |
Sentence Pair Embeddings Based Evaluation Metric for Abstractive and Extractive Summarization (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics, such as ROUGE and BLEU, rely on exact word matching and fail to capture semantic similarity. |
| Approach: | They propose to use contextualized word or sentence embeddings to capture semantic similarity between sentences to evaluate text summarization methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation metric shows that it performs faster than the current state-of-the-art on the SummEval dataset. |
Curious Case of Language Generation Evaluation Metrics: A Cautionary Tale (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a few popular metrics are still used to evaluate language generation systems despite their known limitations. |
| Approach: | They propose to use automatic metrics to evaluate language generation systems . they show that they prefer system outputs to human-authored texts . |
| Outcome: | The proposed metrics are insensitive to correct translations of rare words and can yield high scores when given a single sentence as system output for the entire test set. |
GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desire (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks for text generation are not adequate to assess the quality of the generated outputs. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that utilizes emergent abilities of generative pre-trained models to evaluate generated texts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework can achieve what one desires to evaluate for texts simply by natural language instructions. |
On the Effectiveness of Automated Metrics for Text Generation Systems (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods lack a sound theoretical foundation for evaluation campaigns . imperfect automated metrics and insufficiently sized test sets are some of the factors that cause uncertainty. |
| Approach: | They propose a theoretical framework that incorporates different sources of uncertainty, such as imperfect automated metrics and insufficiently sized test sets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be leveraged to improve evaluation protocols regarding reliability, robustness, and significance of the evaluation outcome. |
Sentence Mover’s Similarity: Automatic Evaluation for Multi-Sentence Texts (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing automatic metrics for evaluating text are expensive and time-consuming. |
| Approach: | They propose automatic metrics that evaluate text in a continuous space using word and sentence embeddings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms ROUGE on machine-generated summaries and human-authored essays on human-generated texts. |
RaTEScore: A Metric for Radiology Report Generation (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing metrics to evaluate the quality of medical reports are limited due to the complexity of clinical free-form texts. |
| Approach: | They propose a new metric to assess the quality of medical reports generated by AI models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric is based on a medical NER dataset and trained on NER models . it aligns more closely with human preference than existing metrics, the authors show . |
Correction of Errors in Preference Ratings from Automated Metrics for Text Generation (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods are over-confident in assigning significant differences between systems . Currently, the most reliable evaluation methods for text generation are human-based evaluations. |
| Approach: | They propose to combine human ratings with automated ratings to reduce the amount of human ratings needed to arrive at robust results. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation protocol reduces the amount of human ratings by 50% while yielding the same evaluation outcome as the pure human evaluation in 95% of cases. |
Evaluating Text Generation Quality Using Spectral Distances of Surprisal (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing metric fails to capture text surprisal, but FACE-2 produces stronger agreement with human preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a new automatic evaluation metric for open-ended text generation . they propose metric that extracts the dynamic patterns (spectrum) of text surprisal . |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric outperforms existing methods in revealing the model scaling effect . it produces stronger agreement with human preferences from a large human-annotated dataset . |
Putting Evaluation in Context: Contextual Embeddings Improve Machine Translation Evaluation (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics are limited and can be easily portable to new languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a simple unsupervised metric and additional supervised metrics which rely on contextual word embeddings to encode the translation and reference sentences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing metrics on the WMT 2017 dataset and is more accurate than existing models. |