Sentence Mover’s Similarity: Automatic Evaluation for Multi-Sentence Texts (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing automatic metrics for evaluating text are expensive and time-consuming. |
| Approach: | They propose automatic metrics that evaluate text in a continuous space using word and sentence embeddings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms ROUGE on machine-generated summaries and human-authored essays on human-generated texts. |
Similar Papers
Sentence Pair Embeddings Based Evaluation Metric for Abstractive and Extractive Summarization (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics, such as ROUGE and BLEU, rely on exact word matching and fail to capture semantic similarity. |
| Approach: | They propose to use contextualized word or sentence embeddings to capture semantic similarity between sentences to evaluate text summarization methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation metric shows that it performs faster than the current state-of-the-art on the SummEval dataset. |
Automated Metrics for Medical Multi-Document Summarization Disagree with Human Evaluations (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Lucy Lu Wang, Yulia Otmakhova, Jay DeYoung, Thinh Hung Truong, Bailey Kuehl, Erin Bransom, Byron Wallace
| Challenge: | Prior work has shown that models may exploit shortcuts that are difficult to detect using standard n-gram similarity metrics such as ROUGE. |
| Approach: | They propose to use human-assessed summary quality facets and pairwise preferences to improve MDS evaluation methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve the quality of literature review summarization models . they use human-assessed summary quality facets and pairwise preferences . |
MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distance (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics are not capable of evaluating text quality. |
| Approach: | They propose a metric that compares system output against reference texts based on semantics rather than surface forms. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric shows a high correlation with human judgment of text quality on a number of text generation tasks. |
SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation (2021.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
Alexander R. Fabbri, Wojciech Kryściński, Bryan McCann, Caiming Xiong, Richard Socher, Dragomir Radev
| Challenge: | a lack of comprehensive studies on evaluation metrics for text summarization hinders progress . a new study aims to improve evaluation metrics that correlate with human judgments . |
| Approach: | They propose to re-evaluate automatic evaluation metrics and share a toolkit for evaluation . they hope to promote a more complete evaluation protocol for text summarization . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation metrics are inconsistent with existing evaluation protocols. |
Evaluate AMR Graph Similarity via Self-supervised Learning (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current AMR metrics do not consider the entire structure of AMR graphs . |
| Approach: | They propose to learn automatic AMR graph similarity evaluation metric by encoding AMR to a pre-trained language model and using GNN adapters to capture structural information of AMR diagrams. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric significantly improves the correlations with human semantic scores and remains robust under diverse challenges. |
Re-evaluating Evaluation in Text Summarization (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automated evaluation metrics are an essential part of the development of text-generation tasks such as summarization. |
| Approach: | They propose to use top-scoring system outputs to assess the reliability of automatic evaluation metrics for text summarization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation method is based on human judgments from 25 top-scoring neural summarization systems. |
A Human Evaluation of AMR-to-English Generation Systems (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent human evaluation of AMR generation systems is compared to automated metrics. |
| Approach: | They propose a human evaluation which collects fluency and adequacy scores and categorization of error types for AMR generation systems. |
| Outcome: | The results show that human evaluations are more nuanced than automated metrics. |
Adapting Sentence-level Automatic Metrics for Document-level Simplification Evaluation (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on text simplification have focused on sentence simplification, but these metrics often underperform on longer texts. |
| Approach: | They propose to adapt existing sentence-level metrics for paragraph- or document-level simplification by incorporating a new approach to the evaluation of text simplification metrics. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms existing sentence-level metrics in terms of correlation with human judgment and the sensitivity and robustness of various metrics to different types of errors produced by existing systems. |
Just Rank: Rethinking Evaluation with Word and Sentence Similarities (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Word and sentence similarity tasks are the de facto evaluation method for embeddings. |
| Approach: | They propose a new intrinsic evaluation method called EvalRank which shows a much stronger correlation with downstream tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method shows a much stronger correlation with downstream tasks and is released for future benchmarking purposes. |
Semantically Driven Sentence Fusion: Modeling and Evaluation (2020.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Sentence fusion is the task of joining related sentences into coherent text. |
| Approach: | They propose a method where ground-truth solutions are automatically expanded into multiple references via curated equivalence classes of connective phrases. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves on state-of-the-art models by expanding ground-truth solutions into multiple references. |