JudgeAgent: Beyond Static Benchmarks for Knowledge-Driven and Dynamic LLM Evaluation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Zhichao Shi, Xuhui Jiang, Chengjin Xu, Cangli Yao, Shengjie Ma, Yinghan Shen, Zixuan Li, Jian Guo, Yuanzhuo Wang
| Challenge: | Current evaluation methods for large language models rely on static benchmarks . limited knowledge coverage and fixed difficulties hinder the targeted optimizations resulting in superficial evaluations of LLMs - a problem that has been addressed by JudgeAgent . |
| Approach: | They propose a knowledge-driven and dynamic evaluation framework for large language models . judgeAgent leverages LLM agents equipped with context graphs to traverse knowledge structures . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can achieve comprehensive evaluations and facilitate effective model iterations. |
Similar Papers
Benchmark Self-Evolving: A Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic LLM Evaluation (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models have demonstrated remarkable performance across tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark self-evolving framework to dynamically evaluate rapidly advancing Large Language Models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework extends existing benchmarks to extend models across tasks and tasks. |
LLM-as-an-Interviewer: Beyond Static Testing Through Dynamic LLM Evaluation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work on LLM-as-a-Judge has reported higher correlations with human judgments due to its static nature. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages multi-turn interactions where the LLM interviewer actively provides feedback on responses and poses follow-up questions to the evaluated LLM. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates six models on reasoning, factuality and instruction-following tasks. |
From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judge (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Dawei Li, Bohan Jiang, Liangjie Huang, Alimohammad Beigi, Chengshuai Zhao, Zhen Tan, Amrita Bhattacharjee, Yuxuan Jiang, Canyu Chen, Tianhao Wu, Kai Shu, Lu Cheng, Huan Liu
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) inspire the "LLM-as-a-judge" paradigm . traditional methods of assessment and evaluation fail in dynamic and open-ended scenarios . |
| Approach: | They propose a paradigm where LLMs are leveraged to perform scoring, ranking, or selection for machine learning evaluation scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model-based judgment and evaluation paradigms are based on large language models and are compared to the current model-driven evaluation paradigm. |
LLMEval-Fair: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study on Robust and Fair Evaluation of Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ming Zhang, Yujiong Shen, Jingyi Deng, Yuhui Wang, Huayu Sha, Kexin Tan, Qiyuan Peng, Yue Zhang, Junzhe Wang, Shichun Liu, Yueyuan Huang, Jingqi Tong, Changhao Jiang, Yilong Wu, Zhihao Zhang, Mingqi Wu, Mingxu Chai, Zhiheng Xi, Shihan Dou, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation of Large Language Models on static benchmarks is vulnerable to data contamination and leaderboard overfitting. |
| Approach: | LLMEval-Fair framework provides a framework for dynamic evaluation of Large Language Models . evaluators use a proprietary bank of 220k graduate-level questions to analyze model data . |
| Outcome: | LLMEval-Fair provides robust and credible evaluation framework for Large Language Models . it provides a strong empirical validation for the dynamic evaluation paradigm . |
Navigating the Modern Evaluation Landscape: Considerations in Benchmarks and Frameworks for Large Language Models (LLMs) (2024.lrec-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | General-purpose Language Models have changed the world of Natural Language Processing, if not the world itself. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will lay the foundations and explain the basics of evaluation and compare traditional methods to newly developed methods. |
| Outcome: | The tutorial assumes little familiarity with metrics, datasets, prompts and benchmarks . it will compare traditional methods to newly developed methods . |
LLM Evaluate: An Industry-Focused Evaluation Tool for Large Language Models (2025.coling-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability to solve a wide range of tasks in recent years. |
| Approach: | They propose to build an on-premise system for LLM evaluation to address the challenges in the evaluation of LLMs in real-world industrial settings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation system protects customer privacy and protects data integrity in real-world industrial environments. |
Praetor: A Fine-Grained Generative LLM Evaluator with Instance-Level Customizable Evaluation Criteria (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yongqi Leng, Renren Jin, Yue Chen, Zhuowen Han, Ling Shi, Jianxiang Peng, Lei Yang, Juesi Xiao, Deyi Xiong
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods are inadequate to evaluate large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained generative LLM evaluator with instance-level customazable evaluation criteria that can be used to evaluate large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing LLM evaluators and instruction-tuned LLMs on multiple benchmarks and sets new SOTA results. |
KIEval: A Knowledge-grounded Interactive Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zhuohao Yu, Chang Gao, Wenjin Yao, Yidong Wang, Wei Ye, Jindong Wang, Xing Xie, Yue Zhang, Shikun Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing methods to detect contaminated texts focus on quantifying contamination status instead of accurately gauging model performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a Knowledge-grounded Interactive Evaluation framework which incorporates an LLM-powered “interactor” role for the first time to accomplish a dynamic contamination-resilient evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework is based on a question in a standard LLM benchmark and can be used to evaluate models in real-world conversations. |
Benchmarking Large Language Models Under Data Contamination: A Survey from Static to Dynamic Evaluation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Simin Chen, Yiming Chen, Zexin Li, Yifan Jiang, Zhongwei Wan, Yixin He, Dezhi Ran, Tianle Gu, Haizhou Li, Tao Xie, Baishakhi Ray
| Challenge: | In the era of evaluating large language models, data contamination is an increasingly prominent concern . static benchmarking has been used for evaluation, but there are limitations of *dynamic* benchmarks . |
| Approach: | They propose a series of optimal design principles for *dynamic* benchmarking and analyze the limitations of existing *static* benchmarks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks highlight a critical gap in the evaluation of LLMs. |
LRBench and Judge-R1: Principled Evaluation and Training of LLM-Based Judges for Long-Context Reasoning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for evaluating large language models (LLMs) under long contexts are underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) that combines reinforcement learning with multi-turn search to enable grounded and principle-aware evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms single-turn baselines across domains and principles. |