LLM-as-an-Interviewer: Beyond Static Testing Through Dynamic LLM Evaluation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work on LLM-as-a-Judge has reported higher correlations with human judgments due to its static nature. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages multi-turn interactions where the LLM interviewer actively provides feedback on responses and poses follow-up questions to the evaluated LLM. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates six models on reasoning, factuality and instruction-following tasks. |
Similar Papers
JudgeAgent: Beyond Static Benchmarks for Knowledge-Driven and Dynamic LLM Evaluation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Zhichao Shi, Xuhui Jiang, Chengjin Xu, Cangli Yao, Shengjie Ma, Yinghan Shen, Zixuan Li, Jian Guo, Yuanzhuo Wang
| Challenge: | Current evaluation methods for large language models rely on static benchmarks . limited knowledge coverage and fixed difficulties hinder the targeted optimizations resulting in superficial evaluations of LLMs - a problem that has been addressed by JudgeAgent . |
| Approach: | They propose a knowledge-driven and dynamic evaluation framework for large language models . judgeAgent leverages LLM agents equipped with context graphs to traverse knowledge structures . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can achieve comprehensive evaluations and facilitate effective model iterations. |
From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judge (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Dawei Li, Bohan Jiang, Liangjie Huang, Alimohammad Beigi, Chengshuai Zhao, Zhen Tan, Amrita Bhattacharjee, Yuxuan Jiang, Canyu Chen, Tianhao Wu, Kai Shu, Lu Cheng, Huan Liu
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) inspire the "LLM-as-a-judge" paradigm . traditional methods of assessment and evaluation fail in dynamic and open-ended scenarios . |
| Approach: | They propose a paradigm where LLMs are leveraged to perform scoring, ranking, or selection for machine learning evaluation scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model-based judgment and evaluation paradigms are based on large language models and are compared to the current model-driven evaluation paradigm. |
LLM Evaluate: An Industry-Focused Evaluation Tool for Large Language Models (2025.coling-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability to solve a wide range of tasks in recent years. |
| Approach: | They propose to build an on-premise system for LLM evaluation to address the challenges in the evaluation of LLMs in real-world industrial settings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation system protects customer privacy and protects data integrity in real-world industrial environments. |
Understand User Opinions of Large Language Models via LLM-Powered In-the-Moment User Experience Interviews (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing large language models (LLMs) are difficult to evaluate and often lack the ability to capture user opinions. |
| Approach: | They propose an LLM-powered interviewer that conducts in-the-moment user experience interviews right after users interact with LLMs and automatically gathers insights about user opinions from massive interview logs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed interviewer captures interesting user opinions, e.g., bipolar views on the displayed reasoning process of DeepSeek-R1 and demands for information freshness and multi-modality. |
Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and Challenges (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | introducing Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened new avenues for assessing generated content quality, e.g., coherence, creativity, and context relevance. |
| Approach: | They propose a taxonomy for organizing existing LLM-based evaluation metrics and a structured framework to understand and compare them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy offers a framework to understand and compare LLM-based evaluation methods. |
KIEval: A Knowledge-grounded Interactive Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zhuohao Yu, Chang Gao, Wenjin Yao, Yidong Wang, Wei Ye, Jindong Wang, Xing Xie, Yue Zhang, Shikun Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing methods to detect contaminated texts focus on quantifying contamination status instead of accurately gauging model performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a Knowledge-grounded Interactive Evaluation framework which incorporates an LLM-powered “interactor” role for the first time to accomplish a dynamic contamination-resilient evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework is based on a question in a standard LLM benchmark and can be used to evaluate models in real-world conversations. |
LLMEval-Fair: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study on Robust and Fair Evaluation of Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ming Zhang, Yujiong Shen, Jingyi Deng, Yuhui Wang, Huayu Sha, Kexin Tan, Qiyuan Peng, Yue Zhang, Junzhe Wang, Shichun Liu, Yueyuan Huang, Jingqi Tong, Changhao Jiang, Yilong Wu, Zhihao Zhang, Mingqi Wu, Mingxu Chai, Zhiheng Xi, Shihan Dou, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation of Large Language Models on static benchmarks is vulnerable to data contamination and leaderboard overfitting. |
| Approach: | LLMEval-Fair framework provides a framework for dynamic evaluation of Large Language Models . evaluators use a proprietary bank of 220k graduate-level questions to analyze model data . |
| Outcome: | LLMEval-Fair provides robust and credible evaluation framework for Large Language Models . it provides a strong empirical validation for the dynamic evaluation paradigm . |
A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendations (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Sawsan Alqahtani, M Saiful Bari, Mizanur Rahman, Mohammad Abdullah Matin Khan, Haidar Khan, Israt Jahan, Amran Bhuiyan, Chee Wei Tan, Md Rizwan Parvez, Enamul Hoque, Shafiq Joty, Jimmy Huang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant attention due to their capabilities in performing diverse tasks across domains. |
| Approach: | They review the primary challenges and limitations causing inconsistencies in evaluations . early models could generate coherent text but limited to simple tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluations are reproducible, reliable, and robust. |
SCORE: Systematic COnsistency and Robustness Evaluation for Large Language Models (2025.naacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Typical evaluations of Large Language Models (LLMs) report a single accuracy metric per dataset, often derived from an optimized setup. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for non-adversarial evaluation of large language models that evaluates models by repeatedly testing them on the same benchmarks in various setups. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates models by repeatedly testing them on the same benchmarks in various setups to give a realistic estimate of their accuracy and consistency. |
Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models via Debates (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are evolving and impacting various fields . current methods for evaluation are based on fixed, domain-specific questions or rely on human input, making them unscalable. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmarking framework based on debates between LLMs, judged by another LLM. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves rankings that align closely with popular rankings based on human input eliminating the need for costly crowdsourcing. |