SCURank: Ranking Multiple Candidate Summaries with Summary Content Units for Enhanced Summarization (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing ranking strategies for large language models suffer from instability and lack of information content. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that enhances summarization by leveraging Summary Content Units (SCUs) they investigate the effectiveness of SCURank in distilling summaries from multiple LLMs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms traditional metrics and LLM-based ranking methods in summarization tasks. |
Similar Papers
On the Role of Summary Content Units in Text Summarization Evaluation (2024.naacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
Marcel Nawrath, Agnieszka Nowak, Tristan Ratz, Danilo Walenta, Juri Opitz, Leonardo Ribeiro, João Sedoc, Daniel Deutsch, Simon Mille, Yixin Liu, Sebastian Gehrmann, Lining Zhang, Saad Mahamood, Miruna Clinciu, Khyathi Chandu, Yufang Hou
| Challenge: | a human written summary content unit (SCU) is used to judge the quality of a summary . a pyramid evaluation method is based on SCUs that decompose a reference summary into concise sentences . |
| Approach: | They propose to use automated SCUs to evaluate the quality of a candidate summary . they propose to generate SCU approximations from AMR meaning representations and large language models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can be fully automated, but lacks the human effort to validate it. |
Towards Multi-dimensional Evaluation of LLM Summarization across Domains and Languages (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Hyangsuk Min, Yuho Lee, Minjeong Ban, Jiaqi Deng, Nicole Hee-Yeon Kim, Taewon Yun, Hang Su, Jason Cai, Hwanjun Song
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks for text summarization lack domain-specific assessment criteria and are predominantly English-centric. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-dimensional, multi-domain evaluation of summarization in English and Chinese that incorporates specialized assessment criteria for each domain and leverages a debate system to enhance annotation quality. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework provides a multi-dimensional, multi-domain evaluation of summarization in English and Chinese. |
ACUEval: Fine-grained Hallucination Evaluation and Correction for Abstractive Summarization (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent-proposed evaluation metrics for large language models have a preference-bias . however, such metrics often lack interpretability and only offer a single score . |
| Approach: | They propose a metric that leverages the power of large language models to perform two sub-tasks: decomposing summaries into atomic content units and validating them against the source document. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric improves faithfulness scores on three summarization evaluation benchmarks by 3% compared to the next-best metric. |
Evaluating Small Language Models for News Summarization: Implications and Factors Influencing Performance (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) provide superior summarization quality, but their high computational resource requirements limit practical use applications. |
| Approach: | They evaluate 19 small language models for news summarization across 2,000 news samples . they find that top-performing models achieve comparable results to those of 70B LLMs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models achieve comparable results to 70B LLMs while generating more concise summaries. |
What Have We Achieved on Text Summarization? (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for text summarization have been investigated, but there are still gaps between them and human professionals. |
| Approach: | They analyze 8 major sources of errors on 10 representative summarization models manually. |
| Outcome: | Aiming to gain more understanding of summarization systems with respect to their strengths and limitations on a fine-grained syntactic and semantic level, we use 8 major sources of errors on 10 representative summarizing models. |
Balancing Lexical and Semantic Quality in Abstractive Summarization (2023.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to reduce exposure bias in sequence-to-sequence models are underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to re-rank sequence-to-sequence neural models to reduce exposure bias. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves an 89.67 BERTScore on the CNN/DailyMail and XSum datasets. |
TriSum: Learning Summarization Ability from Large Language Models with Structured Rationale (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have advanced tasks like text summarization, but their size and computational demands limit their use in resource-constrained and privacy-centric settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for distilling LLMs’ text summarization abilities into a compact, local model using a curriculum learning strategy that evolves from simple to complex tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baseline models on CNN/DailyMail, XSum, and ClinicalTrial, and improves interpretability by providing insights into the summarization rationale. |
On Context Utilization in Summarization with Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models excel in abstractive summarization tasks, delivering fluent and pertinent summaries. |
| Approach: | They conduct the first comprehensive study on context utilization and position bias in summarization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark compares two methods to alleviate position bias in summarization tasks. |
How to Find Strong Summary Coherence Measures? A Toolbox and a Comparative Study for Summary Coherence Measure Evaluation (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to evaluate summary coherence are often evaluated using disparate datasets and metrics. |
| Approach: | They propose to use automatic evaluation to evaluate coherence of summaries by selecting high-scoring candidates. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods show that they can perform better on an even playing field. |
HOLMS: Alternative Summary Evaluation with Large Language Models (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Efficient document summarization requires evaluation measures that can rank a set of systems based on an average score and highlight which individual summary is better than another. |
| Approach: | They propose a hybrid evaluation measure for document summarization called HOLMS that combines both language models pre-trained on large corpora and lexical similarity measures. |
| Outcome: | The proposed measure outperforms ROUGE and BLEU on several extractive summarization datasets for both linguistic quality and pyramid scores. |