Towards Multi-dimensional Evaluation of LLM Summarization across Domains and Languages (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Hyangsuk Min, Yuho Lee, Minjeong Ban, Jiaqi Deng, Nicole Hee-Yeon Kim, Taewon Yun, Hang Su, Jason Cai, Hwanjun Song
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks for text summarization lack domain-specific assessment criteria and are predominantly English-centric. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-dimensional, multi-domain evaluation of summarization in English and Chinese that incorporates specialized assessment criteria for each domain and leverages a debate system to enhance annotation quality. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework provides a multi-dimensional, multi-domain evaluation of summarization in English and Chinese. |
Similar Papers
Re-Evaluating Evaluation for Multilingual Summarization (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Jessica Forde, Ruochen Zhang, Lintang Sutawika, Alham Aji, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Genta Winata, Minghao Wu, Carsten Eickhoff, Stella Biderman, Ellie Pavlick
| Challenge: | Existing studies have shown that automated evaluation approaches correlate with human ratings in English, but this is unclear for other languages. |
| Approach: | They construct a small-scale pilot dataset containing article-summary pairs and human ratings in English, Chinese and Indonesian to measure the strength of summaries. |
| Outcome: | The results show that standard metrics are unreliable measures of quality in Chinese and Indonesian. |
UniSumEval: Towards Unified, Fine-grained, Multi-dimensional Summarization Evaluation for LLMs (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for summarization quality evaluation lack diverse input scenarios, focus on narrowly defined dimensions, and struggle with subjective and coarse-grained annotation schemes. |
| Approach: | They propose to use AI to help human annotations and identifie potentially hallucinogenic input texts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks improve on existing benchmarks in terms of input diversity, granularity of human annotations, and evaluation dimensions. |
Benchmarking Generation and Evaluation Capabilities of Large Language Models for Instruction Controllable Summarization (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Yixin Liu, Alexander Fabbri, Jiawen Chen, Yilun Zhao, Simeng Han, Shafiq Joty, Pengfei Liu, Dragomir Radev, Chien-Sheng Wu, Arman Cohan
| Challenge: | Recent studies have found that large language models (LLMs) can achieve state-of-the-art performance on generic summarization benchmarks, but their performance on more complex summarizing task settings is less studied. |
| Approach: | They benchmark large language models on instruction controllable text summarization . they use 4 evaluation protocols and 11 LLMs to evaluate their performance . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on instruction controllable text summarization tasks with 4 evaluation protocols and 11 LLMs. |
SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation (2021.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
Alexander R. Fabbri, Wojciech Kryściński, Bryan McCann, Caiming Xiong, Richard Socher, Dragomir Radev
| Challenge: | a lack of comprehensive studies on evaluation metrics for text summarization hinders progress . a new study aims to improve evaluation metrics that correlate with human judgments . |
| Approach: | They propose to re-evaluate automatic evaluation metrics and share a toolkit for evaluation . they hope to promote a more complete evaluation protocol for text summarization . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation metrics are inconsistent with existing evaluation protocols. |
An Empirical Study of Many-to-Many Summarization with Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jiaan Wang, Fandong Meng, Zengkui Sun, Yunlong Liang, Yuxuan Cao, Jiarong Xu, Haoxiang Shi, Jie Zhou
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that large language models (LLMs) have strong multilingual abilities, giving them the potential to perform M2MS in real applications. |
| Approach: | They propose to use many-to-many summarization (M2MS) to generate a brief summary in any language given a document also in any other language. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms zero-shot LLMs in terms of automatic evaluations. |
Are Large Language Model-based Evaluators the Solution to Scaling Up Multilingual Evaluation? (2024.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
Rishav Hada, Varun Gumma, Adrian Wynter, Harshita Diddee, Mohamed Ahmed, Monojit Choudhury, Kalika Bali, Sunayana Sitaram
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various tasks, but their evaluation, especially in languages beyond the top 20, remains inadequate due to existing benchmarks and metrics limitations. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Large Language Models as evaluators to rank or score other models’ outputs by calibrating them against 20K human judgments across three text-generation tasks, five metrics, and eight languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation methods can be used to improve multilingual evaluation by calibrating them against 20K human judgments across three text-generation tasks, five metrics, and eight languages. |
MLSUM: The Multilingual Summarization Corpus (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing biases in multi-lingual datasets are limiting the use of multilingual data in document summarization tasks. |
| Approach: | They present MLSUM, the first large-scale MultiLingual SUMmarization dataset. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset contains 1.5M+ article/summary pairs in five different languages. |
CNNSum: Exploring Long-Context Summarization with Large Language Models in Chinese Novels (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Currently, long-context summarization mainly relies on memory ability. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-scale long-context summarization benchmark based on Chinese novels . they use human-driven annotations to analyze long-constituency models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark features human-driven annotations across four subsets with lengths ranging from 16k to 128k. |
MuBench: Assessment of Multilingual Capabilities of Large Language Models Across 61 Languages (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation datasets lack cross-lingual alignment, leaving assessments of multilingual capabilities fragmented in both language and skill coverage. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multilingual consistency as a complementary metric to assess performance bottlenecks and guide model improvement. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model lacks cross-lingual alignment and language coverage gaps between state-of-the-art models. |
SEAHORSE: A Multilingual, Multifaceted Dataset for Summarization Evaluation (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Elizabeth Clark, Shruti Rijhwani, Sebastian Gehrmann, Joshua Maynez, Roee Aharoni, Vitaly Nikolaev, Thibault Sellam, Aditya Siddhant, Dipanjan Das, Ankur Parikh
| Challenge: | evaluating the quality of generated text is a difficult problem for large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset for multilingual, multifaceted summarization evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset can be used to train multilingual summarization systems . it shows that the dataset performs well on the out-of-domain meta-evaluation benchmarks TRUE and mFACE . |