From Tasks to Teams: A Risk-First Evaluation Framework for Multi-Agent LLM Systems in Finance (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on task specific metrics such as accuracy, F1 score, or ROUGE. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-agent, safety-aware evaluation agent that audits large language models without fine-tuning. |
| Outcome: | M-SAEA identifies unsafe trajectories with minimal false positives and reveals latent risks that are not addressed by standard metrics. |
Similar Papers
TAMAS: Benchmarking Adversarial Risks in Multi-Agent LLM Systems (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks and datasets focus on single-agent settings, failing to capture the unique vulnerabilities of multi-agend LLM dynamics and co-ordination. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the robustness and safety of multi-agent LLM systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates the robustness and safety of multi-agent LLM systems. |
Large Language Model Agents in Finance: A Survey Bridging Research, Practice, and Real-World Deployment (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Yifei Dong, Fengyi Wu, Kunlin Zhang, Yilong Dai, Sanjian Zhang, Wanghao Ye, Sihan Chen, Zhi-Qi Cheng
| Challenge: | a systematic review of large language models (LLMs) is conducted to better align their capabilities with real-world demands. |
| Approach: | They propose a functional taxonomy mapping financial domains to tasks, datasets, and institutional constraints. they catalog over 30 financial benchmarks and 20 representative models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model frameworks are bridging financial practice and LLM research. |
AgenticEval: Toward Agentic and Self-Evolving Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing static safety evaluation methods are ill-equipped to address dynamic nature of AI risks and evolving regulations, creating a critical safety gap. |
| Approach: | They propose a new paradigm of agentic safety evaluation reframing evaluation as a continuous and self-evolving process rather than a one-time audit. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework shows a consistent decline in model safety as the evaluation hardens. |
R-Judge: Benchmarking Safety Risk Awareness for LLM Agents (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Tongxin Yuan, Zhiwei He, Lingzhong Dong, Yiming Wang, Ruijie Zhao, Tian Xia, Lizhen Xu, Binglin Zhou, Fangqi Li, Zhuosheng Zhang, Rui Wang, Gongshen Liu
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have shown compelling abilities in reasoning, decision-making, and instruction following. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the proficiency of large language models (LLMs) in judging and identifying safety risks given agent interaction records. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the best-performing model, GPT-4o, while no other models significantly exceed the random. |
Automate Strategy Finding with LLM in Quant Investment (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Zhizhuo Kou, Holam Yu, Junyu Luo, Jingshu Peng, Xujia Li, Chengzhong Liu, Juntao Dai, Lei Chen, Sirui Han, Yike Guo
| Challenge: | Experimental results demonstrate robust performance of the strategy in Chinese & US market regimes compared to established benchmarks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework leveraging Large Language Models within a risk-aware multi-agent system for automate strategy finding in quantitative finance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms all benchmarks in Chinese & US market regimes with 53.17% cumulative return on SSE50. |
INVESTORBENCH: A Benchmark for Financial Decision-Making Tasks with LLM-based Agent (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Haohang Li, Yupeng Cao, Yangyang Yu, Shashidhar Reddy Javaji, Zhiyang Deng, Yueru He, Yuechen Jiang, Zining Zhu, K.p. Subbalakshmi, Jimin Huang, Lingfei Qian, Xueqing Peng, Jordan W. Suchow, Qianqian Xie
| Challenge: | Recent advances have underscored the potential of large language model (LLM)-based agents in financial decision-making. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate LLM agents using 13 different LLMs as backbone models across various market environments and tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework assesses the reasoning and decision-making capabilities of 13 different LLMs across various market environments and tasks. |
RiskLab: A Controlled Toolkit for Probing Emergent Risks in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems (2026.acl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
Yu Jiang, Wenjie Wang, Yue Huang, Yanbo Wang, Zhenhong Zhou, Xiuying Chen, Yang Liu, Pin-Yu Chen, Wei Wang, Xiangliang Zhang
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language model (LLM) agents have accelerated deployment of multi-agent systems for complex tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose an open-source toolkit for instantiating, probing, and measuring emergent risks in LLM-based multi-agent systems under controlled conditions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed toolkit is based on a structured topology–environment–protocol–agent–task quintuple enabling reproducible studies of how communication structure, coordination mechanisms, and incentives shape system-level risks. |
FinSafetyBench: Evaluating LLM Safety in Real-World Financial Scenarios (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing large language models (LLMs) are prone to misuse and misinformation, posing serious compliance risks. |
| Approach: | They propose a bilingual red-teaming benchmark to test an LLM’s refusal of requests that violate financial compliance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark is based on real-world financial crime cases and ethical violations and includes 14 subcategories covering financial crimes and ethical breaches. |
MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Guoli Yin, Haoping Bai, Shuang Ma, Feng Nan, Yanchao Sun, Zhaoyang Xu, Shen Ma, Jiarui Lu, Xiang Kong, Aonan Zhang, Dian Ang Yap, Yizhe Zhang, Karsten Ahnert, Vik Kamath, Mathias Berglund, Dominic Walsh, Tobias Gindele, Juergen Wiest, Zhengfeng Lai, Xiaoming Simon Wang, Jiulong Shan, Meng Cao, Ruoming Pang, Zirui Wang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on specific application scenarios, emphasizing task completion but failing to dissect the underlying skills that drive these outcomes. |
| Approach: | They propose a Massive Multitask Agent Understanding benchmark that evaluates LLMs across five domains and offline tasks. |
| Outcome: | The Massive Multitask Agent Understanding (MMAU) benchmark evaluates models across five domains including Tool-use, Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) QA, Data Science and Machine Learning coding, Contest-level programming and Mathematics. |
Mobile-Bench: An Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-based Mobile Agents (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Shihan Deng, Weikai Xu, Hongda Sun, Wei Liu, Tao Tan, Liujianfeng Liujianfeng, Ang Li, Jian Luan, Bin Wang, Rui Yan, Shuo Shang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for LLM-based mobile agents are insufficient to evaluate their capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLM-based mobile agents' planning capabilities . they expand UI operations by incorporating 103 APIs to accelerate task completion . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks are based on 103 collected APIs and real user queries . the data is categorized into three distinct groups: SAST, SAMT, and MAMT . |