Challenge: Long-context understanding is a critical capability for large language models . evaluating this capability requires extensive human annotation, which is time-consuming and costly.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to assess citation-grounded long-context reasoning in academic writing.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark compares state-of-the-art models with human experts on two tasks . human experts achieve 90% accuracy, but most models struggle with the cloze-style task .

Similar Papers

L-CiteEval: A Suite for Evaluating Fidelity of Long-context Models (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Long-context models (LCMs) have seen remarkable advancements in recent years, facilitating tasks like long-document QA.
Approach: They propose an out-of-the-box suite that can assess both generation quality and fidelity in long-context understanding tasks.
Outcome: The proposed suite can assess both generation quality and fidelity in long-context understanding tasks.
LongCite: Enabling LLMs to Generate Fine-grained Citations in Long-Context QA (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current long-context large language models lack citations to support their responses, making verification difficult due to potential hallucinations.
Approach: They propose to use off-the-shelf LLMs to automatically construct long-context QA instances with precise sentence-level citations and leverage this pipeline to construct a large-scale SFT dataset for LQAC.
Outcome: The proposed pipeline can generate responses with fine-grained citations on the fly, surpassing existing models including GPT-4o.
Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citations (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work relies on commercial search engines and human evaluation, making it difficult to reproduce and compare different modeling approaches.
Approach: They propose a new generation paradigm that requires large language models to provide citations to one or a few text passages for any statement they generate.
Outcome: The proposed model improves factual correctness and verifiability of large language models by providing citations to a set of questions and retrieval corpora and generating answers with citation.
Systematic Evaluation of Long-Context LLMs on Financial Concepts (2024.emnlp-industry)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Long-context large language models (LC LLMs) are promising for tasks with long context windows . however, their ability to reliably utilize their growing context windows remains under investigation .
Approach: They evaluate the performance of long-context large language models using a real-world financial news dataset.
Outcome: The proposed models exhibit brittleness at longer context lengths even for simple tasks, the authors show . they advocate for more rigorous evaluation of LC LLMs by employing holistic metrics such as F1 (rather than recall)
SLR: Automated Synthesis for Scalable Logical Reasoning (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks intended to evaluate reasoning capabilities emphasize deductive reasoning, where conclusions necessarily follow from given premises.
Approach: They propose an end-to-end framework for systematic evaluation and training of Large Language Models via Scalable Logical Reasoning.
Outcome: The proposed framework doubles Llama-3-8B accuracy on SLR-Bench, achieving parity with Gemini-Flash-Thinking at a fraction of computational cost.
Efficient Citer: Tuning Large Language Models for Enhanced Answer Quality and Verification (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing models with explicit citations lack the ability to verify information generated by these models.
Approach: They construct a citation training dataset and fine-tune two models to address the challenge of explicit citations efficiently.
Outcome: The proposed models surpass ChatGPT and exhibit exceptional out-of-domain generalization in both human and automatic evaluation.
Ref-Long: Benchmarking the Long-context Referencing Capability of Long-context Language Models (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Long-context language models have impressive capabilities in long-contrast understanding tasks, but long-text referencing remains underexplored.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to assess long-context referencing capability of LCLMs . they use three subsets to test the model's ability to identify key indexes based on contextual relationships .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark assesses the long-context referencing capability of LCLMs.
Pragmatic inference of scalar implicature by LLMs (2024.acl-srw)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing Large Language Models (LLMs) engage in pragmatic inference of scalar implicature, such as some.
Approach: They investigate how Large Language Models (LLMs) engage in pragmatic inference of scalar implicature, such as some.
Outcome: The proposed models interpret some as pragmatic implicature not all in the absence of context, aligning with human language processing.
Counting-Stars: A Multi-evidence, Position-aware, and Scalable Benchmark for Evaluating Long-Context Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks for long-context language models have lagged behind . however, there is still room for improvement as the context window and complexity of the tasks increase.
Approach: They propose a long-context benchmark to evaluate the performance of long-text language models.
Outcome: The proposed benchmarks show that the models perform better in long-context environments as the context window increases and complexity increases.
Learning Fine-Grained Grounded Citations for Attributed Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: despite impressive performance, large language models still struggle with hallucinations . current approaches suffer from suboptimal citation quality due to reliance on in-context learning .
Approach: They propose a framework that teaches large language models to generate fine-grained citations.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms all baselines on the ALCE benchmark and achieves an average improvement of 14.21% in citation quality.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations