Learning Fine-Grained Grounded Citations for Attributed Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Lei Huang, Xiaocheng Feng, Weitao Ma, Yuxuan Gu, Weihong Zhong, Xiachong Feng, Weijiang Yu, Weihua Peng, Duyu Tang, Dandan Tu, Bing Qin
| Challenge: | despite impressive performance, large language models still struggle with hallucinations . current approaches suffer from suboptimal citation quality due to reliance on in-context learning . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that teaches large language models to generate fine-grained citations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms all baselines on the ALCE benchmark and achieves an average improvement of 14.21% in citation quality. |
Similar Papers
Training Language Models to Generate Text with Citations via Fine-grained Rewards (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent Large Language Models (LLMs) are prone to hallucination and their outputs often contain incorrect or unverifiable claims. |
| Approach: | They propose a training framework using fine-grained rewards to teach LLMs to generate highly supportive and relevant citations while ensuring the correctness of their responses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed training framework outperforms existing methods on QA datasets and surpasses GPT-3.5-turbo on LLaMA-2-7B. |
Effective Large Language Model Adaptation for Improved Grounding and Citation Generation (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models generate "hallucinated" answers that are not factual . despite their widespread adoption, they can generate plausiblesounding but nonfactual information. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that tunes large language models to self-ground claims and provide citations to retrieved documents. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework generates superior grounded responses with more accurate citations compared to prompting-based approaches and post-hoc citing-based methods. |
ALiiCE: Evaluating Positional Fine-grained Citation Generation (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research on citation generation is limited to sentence-level statements . positional fine-grained citations can appear anywhere within sentences . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that allows LLMs to generate citations from sentences . they use dependency tree-based methods to parse sentence-level claims into atomic claims . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates citation quality using three metrics including positional fine-grained citation recall, precision, and coefficient of variation of citation positions. |
LongCite: Enabling LLMs to Generate Fine-grained Citations in Long-Context QA (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jiajie Zhang, Yushi Bai, Xin Lv, Wanjun Gu, Danqing Liu, Minhao Zou, Shulin Cao, Lei Hou, Yuxiao Dong, Ling Feng, Juanzi Li
| Challenge: | Current long-context large language models lack citations to support their responses, making verification difficult due to potential hallucinations. |
| Approach: | They propose to use off-the-shelf LLMs to automatically construct long-context QA instances with precise sentence-level citations and leverage this pipeline to construct a large-scale SFT dataset for LQAC. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline can generate responses with fine-grained citations on the fly, surpassing existing models including GPT-4o. |
Advancing Large Language Model Attribution through Self-Improving (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Lei Huang, Xiaocheng Feng, Weitao Ma, Liang Zhao, Yuchun Fan, Weihong Zhong, Dongliang Xu, Qing Yang, Hongtao Liu, Bing Qin
| Challenge: | Teaching large language models to generate text with citations to evidence sources requires high-quality attribution data, which is costly and labor-intensive. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for iteratively improving the attribution capability of large language models (LLMs) by attributing output to verifiable sources. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on three open-domain question-answering datasets show that START improves in aggregating information across multiple sources. |
Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citations (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work relies on commercial search engines and human evaluation, making it difficult to reproduce and compare different modeling approaches. |
| Approach: | They propose a new generation paradigm that requires large language models to provide citations to one or a few text passages for any statement they generate. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves factual correctness and verifiability of large language models by providing citations to a set of questions and retrieval corpora and generating answers with citation. |
Improving LLM Generations via Fine-Grained Self-Endorsement (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities but can still fail frequently on knowledge-intensive tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a self-endorsement framework that leverages fine-grained fact-level comparisons across multiple sampled responses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can improve factuality of generations with simple prompts across scales of LLMs. |
Fine-Grained Detection of Context-Grounded Hallucinations Using LLMs (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing representations of hallucinations limit the types of errors that can be expressed, so we propose a new representation based on free-form textual descriptions, capturing the full range of possible errors. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for localizing hallucinations using LLMs with a human annotation of over 1,000 examples and a protocol to verify its quality in a humans evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed representation captures the full range of possible errors, and the best model achieves an F1 score of 0.67. |
How Well Do Large Language Models Truly Ground? (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research defines “grounding” as having the correct answer, which does not ensure the reliability of the entire response. |
| Approach: | They propose a stricter definition of grounding: fully utilizes the necessary knowledge from the provided context and stays within the limits of that knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be ground on external contexts and maintain its correct answer. |
GenProve: Learning to Generate Text with Fine-Grained Provenance (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for large language models (LLMs) are coarse-grained and fail to distinguish between direct quotes and complex reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that combines supervised fine-tuning and group relative policy optimization to generate fluent answers while simultaneously producing sentence-level provenance triples. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms 14 strong large language models in joint evaluation. |