Challenge: Existing input-based routers optimize cost-performance trade-offs but provide no formal bound on how often cheaper model fails . a feasibility analysis across all 10 RouterBench models reveals that routability is jointly model- and task-dependent.
Approach: They adapt a proactive conformal gate framework to LLM routing to provide cost-performance trade-offs . they find that a third axis is missing: the routability of queries is model-dependent .
Outcome: The proposed method maintains the target within the tolerance across two benchmarks . it is the first input-based LLM router with distribution-free safety guarantees .

Similar Papers

How Robust Are Router-LLMs? Analysis of the Fragility of LLM Routing Capabilities (2026.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language model (LLM) routing has emerged as a promising solution to balancing computational costs and performance.
Approach: They propose a framework that categorizes router performance across a broad spectrum of query types . large language models have revolutionized natural language processing .
Outcome: The proposed framework categorizes router performance across a broad spectrum of query types . it integrates privacy and safety assessments to reveal hidden risks .
InferenceDynamics: Adaptive LLM Routing through Structured Capability and Knowledge Profiling (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Model (LLM) routing is a pivotal technique for navigating a diverse landscape of LLMs.
Approach: They propose a flexible and scalable multi-dimensional routing framework that models the capability and knowledge of models.
Outcome: The proposed framework can be used to generalize and identify top-performing models for group-level routing using modern benchmarks including MMLU-Pro, GPQA, BigGenBench, and LiveBench.
X-Router: Decoupling Knowledge and Reasoning for Cost-Effective LLM Inference (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing adaptive methods focus on a single axis, overlooking evidence need and reasoning depth are only partially correlated.
Approach: They propose a dual-axis routing framework that separates retrieval necessity from reasoning necessity under a user-defined cost–quality trade-off.
Outcome: The proposed framework reduces token usage and latency while improving answer quality over strong baselines.
MixLLM: Dynamic Routing in Mixed Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit potential artificial generic intelligence, however, their usage is costly with high response latency.
Approach: They develop a dynamic contextual-bandit-based routing system for query-LLM assignment that leverages query tags to enhance query embeddings.
Outcome: The proposed model maximizes response quality and minimizes cost and latency.
LLMRouterBench: A Massive Benchmark and Unified Framework for LLM Routing (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language model (LLM) routing assigns each query to the best suitable model from an ensemble.
Approach: They introduce a large-scale benchmark and unified framework for LLM routing . they find that many routing methods exhibit similar performance under unified evaluation .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark provides comprehensive metrics for both performance-oriented and performance-cost trade-off routing.
Into the Gray Zone: Domain Contexts Can Blur LLM Safety Boundaries (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a goal of LLM alignment is to balance usefulness with harmlessness, but this conflictes when knowledge serves both legitimate and malicious purposes.
Approach: They propose a framework that combines safety-research contexts with adversarial interactions to exploit a vulnerability in Jargon queries.
Outcome: a framework outperforms existing methods in analyzing Jargon queries, a study shows . it achieves 93% of attacks across seven models, while remaining useful, the authors say .
LLM-VA: Resolving the Jailbreak-Overrefusal Trade-off via Vector Alignment (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing vector steering methods adjust the magnitude of answer vectors, but this creates a fundamental trade-off—reducing jailbreak increases over-refusal.
Approach: They propose a method which aligns va with vb through closed-form weight updates, making the model’s willingness to respond causally dependent on its safety assessment.
Outcome: Experiments on 12 LLMs show that the proposed method achieves 11.45% higher F1 than the best baseline while preserving 95.92% utility.
Safety Is Not Universal: The Selective Safety Trap in LLM Alignment (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing safety evaluations of large language models aggregate harms under generic categories such as "Identity Hate" a bilingual benchmark identifies a selective safety trap, where defense rates vary by up to 42% within the same model solely based on the target group.
Approach: They propose a bilingual adversarial benchmark to audit selective safety in large language models . defense rates vary by up to 42% within the same model solely based on target group .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark identifies a selective safety trap in large language models . defense rates vary by up to 42% within the same model solely based on the target group.
SafeConstellations: Mitigating Over-Refusals in LLMs Through Task-Aware Representation Steering (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current safety alignment methods fail to identify intended benign task before refusing to respond.
Approach: They propose a method that uses inference-time trajectory-shifting to guide model behavior . they show that LLMs persist in refusing inputs containing harmful content .
Outcome: The proposed approach reduces over-refusals with minimal impact on utility.
Course-Correction: Safety Alignment Using Synthetic Preferences (2024.emnlp-industry)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies show that large language models generate harmful content, but the potential for generating harmful content is an escalating concern.
Approach: They propose to fine-tune LLMs with preference learning to emphasize the preference for timely course-correction by using an automated pipeline.
Outcome: The proposed model improves course-correction skills without affecting general performance and resists jailbreak attacks.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations