SafetyQuizzer: Timely and Dynamic Evaluation on the Safety of LLMs (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have been used to evaluate the safety of their users . however, evaluation questions in current benchmarks are too straightforward and difficult to update with practical relevance due to their lack of correlation with real-world events. |
| Approach: | They propose a question-generation framework to evaluate the safety of LLMs in the Chinese context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reduces decline rate while maintaining similar attack success rate. |
Similar Papers
A Chinese Dataset for Evaluating the Safeguards in Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yuxia Wang, Zenan Zhai, Haonan Li, Xudong Han, Shom Lin, Zhenxuan Zhang, Angela Zhao, Preslav Nakov, Timothy Baldwin
| Challenge: | a recent study has shown that large language models can produce harmful responses, exposing users to unexpected risks. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset for the safety evaluation of Chinese LLMs in Mandarin Chinese . they extend the dataset to better identify false negative and false positive examples . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset is for the safety evaluation of Chinese LLMs, and is based on a Chinese dataset. |
Chinese SafetyQA: A Safety Short-form Factuality Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yingshui Tan, Boren Zheng, Baihui Zheng, Kerui Cao, Huiyun Jing, Jincheng Wei, Jiaheng Liu, Yancheng He, Wenbo Su, Xiaoyong Zhu, Bo Zheng, Kaifu Zhang
| Challenge: | Large language models have created significant safety concerns . factuality ability is crucial in determining whether they can be deployed and applied safely and compliantly within specific regions. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the factuality of large language models in China . they evaluate the models' ability to provide accurate and reliable information . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates the factuality abilities of existing LLMs and compares them to LLM abilities. |
SafeConf: A Confidence-Calibrated Safety Self-Evaluation Method for Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Bo Zhang, Cong Gao, Linkang Yang, Bingxu Han, Minghao Hu, Zhunchen Luo, Guotong Geng, Xiaoying Bai, Jun Zhang, Wen Yao, Zhong Wang
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have many advantages but they also pose significant safety risks. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to enhance the safety self-evaluation capability of LLMs . they perform semantic mutations on the original safety evaluation questions . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves safety self-evaluation accuracy by 5.86% and 7.79% over baseline methods on Chinese and English datasets. |
Is Safety Standard Same for Everyone? User-Specific Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Yeonjun In, Wonjoong Kim, Kanghoon Yoon, Sungchul Kim, Mehrab Tanjim, Sangwu Park, Kibum Kim, Chanyoung Park
| Challenge: | Extensive benchmarks evaluate LLM safety relying heavily on general standards . no benchmark datasets exist to evaluate the user-specific safety of LLMs . |
| Approach: | a new benchmark is designed to assess user-specific aspect of LLM safety . authors propose a simple remedy based on chain-of-thought to improve user-specified safety. |
| Outcome: | a new benchmark assesses the user-specific aspect of LLM safety . the proposed solution improves user-specified safety by chain-of-thought . |
Do-Not-Answer: Evaluating Safeguards in LLMs (2024.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a dataset evaluating harmful capabilities in large language models is available at https://github.com/Libr-AI/do-not-answer. |
| Approach: | They collect an open-source dataset to evaluate the safeguards in large language models . they find that simple BERT-style classifiers can achieve results comparable to GPT-4 . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset compares the safety of six popular LLMs to GPT-4 on automatic safety evaluation. |
Interpretation Meets Safety: A Survey on Interpretation Methods and Tools for Improving LLM Safety (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing surveys focus on interpretation or safety, but safety and understanding are core motivations for interpretation research. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that connects interpretation methods, enhancements they inform, and tools that operationalize them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework summarizes nearly 70 studies at their intersections and concludes with open challenges and future directions. |
Attacks, Defenses and Evaluations for LLM Conversation Safety: A Survey (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are now commonplace in conversation applications, but their misuse for generating harmful responses has raised serious societal concerns. |
| Approach: | They provide a comprehensive overview of recent studies covering attacks, defenses, and evaluations of Large Language Models (LLMs) . |
| Outcome: | The proposed review summarizes three aspects of LLM conversation safety: attacks, defenses, and evaluations. |
SAFETY-J: Evaluating Safety with Critique (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current methods focus on binary safety classifications and lack detailed critique, limiting their utility for model improvement and user trust. |
| Approach: | They propose a bilingual generative safety evaluator for English and Chinese with critique-based judgment that utilizes a robust training dataset and augmented query-response pairs to assess safety across various scenarios comprehensively. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves safety evaluations by assessing the quality of critiques with minimal human intervention. |
The Art of Defending: A Systematic Evaluation and Analysis of LLM Defense Strategies on Safety and Over-Defensiveness (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work on Large Language Models (LLMs) has identified a number of approaches to protect against their vulnerabilities and safety. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a large collection of safe and unsafe prompts to evaluate various LLM defense strategies over both ‘safety’ and ‘over-defensiveness’. |
| Outcome: | The proposed defense strategies are compared on multiple state-of-the-art LLMs and show that they are effective against both ‘safety’ and ‘over-defensiveness’. |
SafeLawBench: Towards Safe Alignment of Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Chuxue Cao, Han Zhu, Jiaming Ji, Qichao Sun, Zhenghao Zhu, Wu Yinyu, Josef Dai, Yaodong Yang, Sirui Han, Yike Guo
| Challenge: | Recent studies indicate that large language models (LLMs) may exhibit risks, including threats to the protection of private data and the generation of hallucinations. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate LLMs from a legal perspective using the SafeLawBench benchmark. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework categorizes safety risks into three levels based on legal standards and includes 24,860 multi-choice questions and 1,106 open-domain question-answering tasks. |