GuideLLM: Exploring LLM-Guided Conversation with Applications in Autobiography Interviewing (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jinhao Duan, Xinyu Zhao, Zhuoxuan Zhang, Eunhye Grace Ko, Lily Boddy, Chenan Wang, Tianhao Li, Alexander Rasgon, Junyuan Hong, Min Kyung Lee, Chenxi Yuan, Qi Long, Ying Ding, Tianlong Chen, Kaidi Xu
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their effectiveness in human-guided dialogues, but tasks in the real world are more complex and require greater autonomy from LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose to characterize LLM-guided conversation into three fundamental components: Goal Navigation, Context Management, Empathetic Engagement and implement an interviewing environment for the evaluation of LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed LLM outperforms baseline LLMs in interviewing quality and autobiography generation quality. |
Similar Papers
How Well Can Large Language Models Reflect? A Human Evaluation of LLM-generated Reflections for Motivational Interviewing Dialogues (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Erkan Basar, Xin Sun, Iris Hendrickx, Jan de Wit, Tibor Bosse, Gert-Jan De Bruijn, Jos A. Bosch, Emiel Krahmer
| Challenge: | Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a counseling technique that promotes behavioral change through reflective responses to mirror or refine client statements. |
| Approach: | They assess the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate MI reflections via three LLMs: GPT-4, Llama-2, and BLOOM. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models generate meaningful reflections comparable to human therapists, but significant challenges remain. |
A Survey on LLM-powered Agents for Recommender Systems (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding, reasoning, and generation. |
| Approach: | They present a comprehensive synthesis of large language models and their applications . they dissect a four-module agent architecture and review representative designs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models address fundamental challenges in traditional recommender systems . they include limited comprehension of complex user intents, insufficient interaction capabilities . |
LLM-as-an-Interviewer: Beyond Static Testing Through Dynamic LLM Evaluation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work on LLM-as-a-Judge has reported higher correlations with human judgments due to its static nature. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages multi-turn interactions where the LLM interviewer actively provides feedback on responses and poses follow-up questions to the evaluated LLM. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates six models on reasoning, factuality and instruction-following tasks. |
Toward Beginner-Friendly LLMs for Language Learning: Controlling Difficulty in Conversation (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Practicing conversations with large language models is a promising alternative to traditional in-person language learning. |
| Approach: | They propose a new token-level evaluation metric, Token Miss Rate, that measures the proportion of incomprehensible tokens per utterance and correlates strongly with human judgments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve comprehensibility for beginner speakers from 39.4% to 83.3%, compared with prompting alone and a token-level evaluation metric, Token Miss Rate (TMR). |
Bootstrapping LLM-based Task-Oriented Dialogue Agents via Self-Talk (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are powerful dialogue agents, but specializing them towards fulfilling a specific function can be prohibitive in terms of feasibility, time, and resources. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for training large language models by enabling "self-talk" they propose supervised fine-tuning of LLMs to improve quality of dialogues . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method generates training data via "self-talk" of LLMs that can be refined and utilized for supervised fine-tuning. |
Prompting and Evaluating Large Language Models for Proactive Dialogues: Clarification, Target-guided, and Non-collaboration (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that ChatGPT has limitations such as failing to ask clarifying questions to ambiguous queries or refusing problematic user requests. |
| Approach: | They propose a Proactive Chain-of-Thought prompting scheme which augments LLMs with the goal planning capability over descriptive reasoning chains to trigger proactivity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed scheme augments LLMs with the goal planning capability over descriptive reasoning chains to trigger the proactivity of LLM-based proactive dialogue systems. |
Aligning LLMs with Individual Preferences via Interaction (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on LLMs alignment focus on generalizing their behavior to generalized values such as helpfulness, harmlessness, and honesty. |
| Approach: | They train large language models to "interact to align" to implicitly infer user preferences . they use a multi-turn preference dataset to generate a personalized alignment . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method enables dynamic, personalized alignment via interaction with a multi-turn preference dataset. |
DialogBench: Evaluating LLMs as Human-like Dialogue Systems (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks only evaluate LLMs' abilities for task completion as assistant AI. |
| Approach: | They propose a dialogue evaluation benchmark that contains 12 dialogue tasks to evaluate LLMs' capabilities as human-like dialogue systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark contains 12 tasks to evaluate LLMs' capabilities . it shows that instruction tuning improves human likeness, but not as human-like systems . |
Understand User Opinions of Large Language Models via LLM-Powered In-the-Moment User Experience Interviews (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing large language models (LLMs) are difficult to evaluate and often lack the ability to capture user opinions. |
| Approach: | They propose an LLM-powered interviewer that conducts in-the-moment user experience interviews right after users interact with LLMs and automatically gathers insights about user opinions from massive interview logs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed interviewer captures interesting user opinions, e.g., bipolar views on the displayed reasoning process of DeepSeek-R1 and demands for information freshness and multi-modality. |
BotChat: Evaluating LLMs’ Capabilities of Having Multi-Turn Dialogues (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Haodong Duan, Jueqi Wei, Chonghua Wang, Hongwei Liu, Yixiao Fang, Songyang Zhang, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen
| Challenge: | Modern Large Language Models (LLMs) facilitate high-quality, multi-turn dialogues with humans, but human-based evaluation of such a capability requires substantial manual effort. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate LLMs' ability to emulate human-like, multi-turn conversations using an LLM-centric approach. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model emulates human-like, multi-turn conversations using an LLM-centric approach. |