TESTEVAL: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Test Case Generation (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Wenhan Wang, Chenyuan Yang, Zhijie Wang, Yuheng Huang, Zhaoyang Chu, Da Song, Lingming Zhang, An Ran Chen, Lei Ma
| Challenge: | Existing methods to generate test cases using large language models are limited in their ability to generate unit test cases. |
| Approach: | They propose a test case generation benchmark that uses large language models to generate unit test cases. |
| Outcome: | The proposed test case generation benchmarks compare LLMs with commercial and open-source LLM platforms and find that they lack the ability to comprehend program logic and execution paths. |
Similar Papers
Prompting Large Language Models to Tackle the Full Software Development Lifecycle: A Case Study (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Bowen Li, Wenhan Wu, Ziwei Tang, Lin Shi, John Yang, Jinyang Li, Shunyu Yao, Chen Qian, Binyuan Hui, Qicheng Zhang, Zhiyin Yu, He Du, Ping Yang, Dahua Lin, Chao Peng, Kai Chen
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focused on simplified or isolated aspects of coding, ignoring the full spectrum of programming challenges. |
| Approach: | They propose a case study that examines the performance of large language models across the entire software development lifecycle with four programming languages, multiple domains, and carefully designed and verified metrics for each task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs across the entire software development lifecycle, including design, environment setup, implementation, acceptance testing, and unit testing. |
The Program Testing Ability of Large Language Models for Code (2024.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent development of large language models (LLMs) for code shows promise in achieving code intelligence. |
| Approach: | They explore the ability of large language models to generate automated test cases . they show +11.77% and +4.22% higher code pass rates on HumanEval+ . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models show higher pass rates on humanEval+ compared with the current state-of-the-art models. |
Can LLMs Generate High-Quality Test Cases for Algorithm Problems? TestCase-Eval: A Systematic Evaluation of Fault Coverage and Exposure (2025.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | TestCase-Eval focuses on Fault Coverage and Fault Exposure tasks . authors provide insights into their strengths and limitations in generating effective test cases . correctness and robustness of algorithmic solutions hinge on quality of test suites . |
| Approach: | They introduce TestCase-Eval, a benchmark for systematic evaluation of LLMs in test-case generation. |
| Outcome: | The new benchmark measures the performance of LLMs in test-case generation. |
Program Structure-aware Language Models: Targeted Software Testing beyond Textual Semantics (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models for test case generation have improved branch coverage via prompt-engineered mutations, limiting their effectiveness for discovering subtle bugs and security vulnerabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a program structure-aware LLM framework that integrates code property graphs and code semantics to condition test case generation on execution branches. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on real-world projects show that GLMTest improves branch accuracy from 27.4% to 50.2% on TestGenEval benchmark compared with state-of-the-art LLMs, i.e., Claude-Sonnet-4.5 and GPT-4o-mini. |
DevEval: A Manually-Annotated Code Generation Benchmark Aligned with Real-World Code Repositories (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jia Li, Ge Li, Yunfei Zhao, Yongmin Li, Huanyu Liu, Hao Zhu, Lecheng Wang, Kaibo Liu, Zheng Fang, Lanshen Wang, Jiazheng Ding, Xuanming Zhang, Yuqi Zhu, Yihong Dong, Zhi Jin, Binhua Li, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li, Bin Gu, Mengfei Yang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks are poorly aligned with real-world code repositories and are insufficient to evaluate the coding abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a repository-level benchmark named DevEval to evaluate LLMs' coding abilities in real-world code repositories. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that the LLMs perform better in real-world code repositories than existing benchmarks. |
CodeContests-O: Powering LLMs via Feedback-Driven Iterative Test Case Generation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jianfeng Cai, Jinhua Zhu, Ruopei Sun, Kangwen Zhao, Dongyun Xue, Mingxiao Feng, Wengang Zhou, Houqiang Li
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to synthesize test cases using Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on the model’s intrinsic generation capabilities without external feedback, resulting in insufficiently diverse cases. |
| Approach: | They propose a feedback-driven iterative framework that leverages Large Language Models to generate initial test cases, execute them against known correct and incorrect solutions, and utilizes the failed results as feedback to guide the LLM in refining the test cases toward high fidelity and discriminability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms the existing codecontests and codecontests+ models by 4.30% and 8.78%. |
PythonSaga: Redefining the Benchmark to Evaluate Code Generating LLMs (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | *HumanEval* and *MBPP* are two popular benchmarks for Python code generation. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale human evaluation of two popular Python benchmarks . they propose 185 hand-crafted prompts in a balanced representation of 38 programming concepts across diverse difficulty levels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show a critical bias towards a limited set of programming concepts, neglecting most of the other concepts entirely. |
XCodeEval: An Execution-based Large Scale Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Code Understanding, Generation, Translation and Retrieval (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have shown impressive abilities in generating codes from natural language descriptions, repairing buggy codes, translating codes between languages, and retrieving relevant code segments. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a multilingual multitask benchmark to evaluate large language models that can generate codes from natural language descriptions, repair buggy codes, and translate between languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs 7 tasks covering up to 11 languages with execution-level parallelism and 25 M document-level coding examples (16.5 B tokens) |
GlotEval: A Test Suite for Massively Multilingual Evaluation of Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-demos)
Copied to clipboard
Hengyu Luo, Zihao Li, Joseph Attieh, Sawal Devkota, Ona de Gibert, Xu Huang, Shaoxiong Ji, Peiqin Lin, Bhavani Sai Praneeth Varma Mantina, Ananda Sreenidhi, Raúl Vázquez, Mengjie Wang, Samea Yusofi, Fei Yuan, Jörg Tiedemann
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation frameworks focus on English and a handful of high-resource languages, thereby overlooking the realistic performance of large language models in multilingual and lower-resourced scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a unified and lightweight framework that integrates 27 benchmarks under a standard ISO 639-3 language identifier system to enable seamless incorporation of new benchmarks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework integrates 27 benchmarks under a standard ISO 639-3 language identifier system, allowing for seamless incorporation of new benchmarks. |
CodeJudge-Eval: Can Large Language Models be Good Judges in Code Understanding? (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive code generation capabilities, primarily evaluated through language-to-code benchmarks. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess LLMs’ code understanding abilities from the perspective of code judging rather than code generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates 12 well-known large language models to determine the correctness of provided code solutions. |