Challenge: Using a template-based semi-automated generation method, we evaluate time-conditional group bias in time-sensitive knowledge of large language models (LLMs).
Approach: They propose a template-based semi-automated generation method to construct a time-conditional group bias benchmark.
Outcome: The proposed method balancing quality-quantity trade-off in existing benchmark curation approaches.

Similar Papers

Chronos: Learning Temporal Dynamics of Reasoning Chains for Test-Time Scaling (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for testing time scales treat reasoning traces or tokens equally, ignoring substantial variations in trajectory quality and localized logical failures.
Approach: They propose a chronological reasoning scorer that models each trajectory as a time series.
Outcome: The proposed method achieves relative improvements of 34.21% over Pass@128 and 22.70% over Maj@135 on HMMT25, highlighting its effectiveness.
DateLogicQA: Benchmarking Temporal Biases in Large Language Models (2025.naacl-srw)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: DateLogicQA examines temporal biases in Large Language Models (LLMs) 190 questions are curated by humans to examine temporal reasoning across date formats and contexts .
Approach: They propose a human-curated benchmark of 190 questions specifically designed to understand temporal bias in Large Language Models.
Outcome: The proposed dataset covers seven date formats across past, present, and future contexts . it examines four reasoning types: commonsense, factual, conceptual, and numerical .
ChronoSense: Exploring Temporal Understanding in Large Language Models with Time Intervals of Events (2025.acl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) still face significant challenges in reasoning and arithmetic.
Approach: They propose a new benchmark to evaluate LLMs' temporal understanding that includes 16 tasks identifying the Allen relation between two temporal events and temporal arithmetic.
Outcome: The proposed model handles Allen relations, even symmetrical ones, quite differently.
ExAnte: A Benchmark for Ex-Ante Inference in Large Language Models (2026.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) struggle with ex-ante reasoning—making inferences or predictions without access to future information.
Approach: They propose a benchmark that assesses LLMs’ ex-ante inference ability across four tasks: stock prediction, question answering, Wikipedia event generation, and scientific publication generation.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark assesses LLMs’ ex-ante inference ability across four tasks.
MenatQA: A New Dataset for Testing the Temporal Comprehension and Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have shown nearly saturated performance on many NLP tasks.
Approach: They construct multiple sensitive factors time QA which encompasses three temporal factors . they test current mainstream LLMs with different parameter sizes .
Outcome: The proposed model incorporates three temporal factors with 2,853 samples . the results show that LLMs fall behind smaller models on these factors .
Temporal Referential Consistency: Do LLMs Favor Sequences Over Absolute Time References? (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing efforts to ensure temporal consistency in large language models are lacking in time-sensitive fields . temporal reasoning is essential for time- sensitive fields such as finance and healthcare . a new benchmark aims to improve temporal referent consistency of LLMs .
Approach: They propose a temporal referential consistency benchmark with a resource TEMP-ReCon to assess LLMs across temporal references.
Outcome: The proposed model improves LLMs' temporal consistency by comparing them to baseline models.
Chronocept: Instilling a Sense of Time in Machines (2026.eacl-srw)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Human cognition is deeply intertwined with a sense of time, known as Chronoception, which allows us to judge how long facts remain valid and when knowledge becomes outdated.
Approach: They propose a model that captures nuanced patterns of emergence, decay, and peak relevance using skew-normal curves fitted along semantically decomposed temporal axes.
Outcome: The proposed model captures nuanced patterns of emergence, decay, and peak relevance in two datasets.
TWBias: A Benchmark for Assessing Social Bias in Traditional Chinese Large Language Models through a Taiwan Cultural Lens (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models have shown remarkable capabilities in natural language processing, but concerns about social bias amplification remain.
Approach: They propose a social bias evaluation benchmark for Traditional Chinese LLMs that integrates chat templates and diverse prompts for comprehensive bias assessment.
Outcome: The proposed model incorporates chat templates and diverse prompts for comprehensive bias assessment focusing on Taiwan's cultural context and prioritizing gender and ethnicity bias evaluation.
Is Your LLM Outdated? A Deep Look at Temporal Generalization (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to evaluate large language models are limited due to their inherent dynamic nature and the inherent dynamicity of language and information.
Approach: They introduce a new evaluation framework that employs fresh text and event prediction for assessing LLMs’ temporal adaptability.
Outcome: The proposed framework shows significant temporal biases and a decline in performance over time.
TimeBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Temporal Reasoning Abilities in Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Grasping the concept of time is a fundamental facet of human cognition.
Approach: They propose a hierarchical temporal reasoning benchmark that covers a broad spectrum of temporal phenomena.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark shows that state-of-the-art LLMs are still far behind humans in temporal reasoning .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations