Challenge: Existing video-to-text summarization evaluation methods depend heavily on human-written reference summaries.
Approach: They propose a reference-free metric evaluating candidate summaries directly against source videos through multimodal question answering.
Outcome: The proposed metric assesses candidate summaries directly against source videos through multimodal question answering.

Similar Papers

Measuring What Matters Beyond Text: Evaluating Multimodal Summaries by Quality, Alignment, and Diversity (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: MLLMs have facilitated multimodal summarization with multimodal outputs, but their evaluation is fragmented . MM-Eval integrates assessments of textual quality, cross-modal alignment, and visual diversity .
Approach: They propose a unified evaluation framework that integrates assessments of textual quality, cross-modal alignment, and visual diversity.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves over heuristic aggregation baselines and provides an interpretable, reference-weak framework for comparative evaluation of multimodal summaries.
Automatic, Meta and Human Evaluation for Multimodal Summarization with Multimodal Output (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multimodal summarization with multimodal output (MSMO) has attracted increasing research interest . evaluation is an emerging yet underexplored research topic .
Approach: They propose a framework that studies three research questions of MSMO evaluation . they propose an automatic evaluation metric and a meta-evaluation benchmark dataset .
Outcome: The proposed evaluation metric and human-annotated meta-evaluation benchmark are used to assess the quality of evaluation metrics and show the framework is effective.
Towards Question-Answering as an Automatic Metric for Evaluating the Content Quality of a Summary (2021.tacl-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing text overlap based evaluation metrics are limited to matching tokens, either lexically or via embeddings.
Approach: They propose a metric to evaluate the content quality of a summary using question-answering (QA) QA-based methods directly measure a summary’s information overlap with a reference, making them fundamentally different from text overlap metrics.
Outcome: The proposed metric outperforms current state-of-the-art metrics on most evaluations using benchmark datasets while being competitive on others due to limitations of state- of-the art models.
QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluation (2021.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation metrics for summarization evaluation are limited and do not correlate well with human judgments.
Approach: They propose to extend existing evaluation metrics to include question answering models to assess whether a summary contains all relevant information in its source document.
Outcome: The proposed framework significantly improves the correlation with human judgments over four evaluation dimensions.
What Is That Talk About? A Video-to-Text Summarization Dataset for Scientific Presentations (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: VISTA dataset contains 18,599 recorded AI conference presentations . large multimodal models exhibit reduced performance in scientific contexts, study shows .
Approach: They propose a dataset specifically designed for video-to-text summarization in scientific domains.
Outcome: This paper compares the performance of large models with human models and shows that they improve on human models.
SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation (2021.tacl-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a lack of comprehensive studies on evaluation metrics for text summarization hinders progress . a new study aims to improve evaluation metrics that correlate with human judgments .
Approach: They propose to re-evaluate automatic evaluation metrics and share a toolkit for evaluation . they hope to promote a more complete evaluation protocol for text summarization .
Outcome: The proposed evaluation metrics are inconsistent with existing evaluation protocols.
MM-AVS: A Full-Scale Dataset for Multi-modal Summarization (2021.naacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multimodal summarization materials lacking a holistic organization by integrating resources from various modalities.
Approach: They propose a multimodal article and video summarization dataset that integrates resources from different modalities.
Outcome: The proposed dataset validates the important assistance role of external information for multimodal summarization.
MSMO: Multimodal Summarization with Multimodal Output (D18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies show that multimodal summarization can improve user satisfaction for informativeness of summaries by using information in visual modality.
Approach: They propose a task to generate text and select the most relevant image from the multimodal input and a novel multimodal automatic evaluation method to evaluate multimodal outputs.
Outcome: The proposed method improves user satisfaction by 12.4% compared to the current system .
Detecting and Mitigating Challenges in Zero-Shot Video Summarization with Video LLMs (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Video Large Language Models (VLLMs) exhibit impressive zero-shot capabilities in video analysis, but their performance varies significantly depending on the LLM prompt, the characteristics of the video, and the properties of the training data and LLM architecture.
Approach: They propose to use Chain-of-Thought prompting to inject knowledge extracted by external, lightweight models into video summarization benchmarks to evaluate their performance.
Outcome: The proposed solutions improve summarization performance by injecting knowledge extracted by external, lightweight models.
QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarization (2022.naacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on text summarization factual consistency are divided into two categories . entailment-based and question answering-based metrics are the most efficient .
Approach: They propose an optimized QA-based metric that improves factual consistency by 14% . they compare entailment-based and QA metrics to find the best fit .
Outcome: The proposed metric outperforms the best performing entailment-based metric on the SummaC factual consistency benchmark.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations