Challenge: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have been a key advance in video understanding but their vulnerability to adversarial tampering remains underexplored.
Approach: They evaluate MLLMs against five prevalent tampering techniques to assess their robustness . they use a tampered video format to examine the vulnerability of ML models .
Outcome: The benchmark evaluates MLLMs against five prevalent tampering techniques based on 19 video manipulation tasks.

Similar Papers

WebUIBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models in WebUI-to-Code (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks for large language models focus on webpage generation outcomes.
Approach: They propose a multi-view evaluation framework to evaluate MLLMs in four key areas: WebUI Perception, HTML Programming, WebUI-HTML Understanding, and WebUI to code.
Outcome: The proposed framework evaluates MLLMs in four key areas: WebUI Perception, HTML Programming, WebUI-HTML Understanding, and WebUI to code.
Jailbreaking Multimodal Large Language Models using Multi-Clip Video (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies show that video inputs can bypass safety alignment, yet it remains unclear which properties of video input induce this vulnerability.
Approach: They propose a simple image-based defense that mitigates the vulnerability of MLLMs by analyzing video inputs.
Outcome: The proposed defense leverages the relative robustness of the image modality.
VLSBench: Unveiling Visual Leakage in Multimodal Safety (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies show that textual unlearning does not achieve comparable safety performance with image-text alignment.
Approach: They propose to use textual unlearning to align MLLMs with image-text pairs to explain this problem . they construct a visual leakless safety bench with 2.2k image- text pairs to test this problem.
Outcome: The proposed model can refuse image-text pairs according to textual queries, leading to unreliable safety evaluations.
Multifaceted Evaluation of Audio-Visual Capability for MLLMs: Effectiveness, Efficiency, Generalizability and Robustness (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multi-modal large language models have been used for processing and understanding information from diverse modalities.
Approach: They propose to evaluate the audio-visual capabilities of multi-modal large language models . they focus on effectiveness, efficiency, generalizability, and robustness .
Outcome: The proposed models exhibit strong zero-shot and few-shot generalization abilities . their success relies heavily on the vision modality, which impairs performance when visual input is corrupted or missing.
Tiny Scales, Great Challenges: The Limits of Multimodal LLMs in Scale Recognition (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks focus on a single type of quantity or a specific format, lacking a comprehensive evaluation of scale recognition capabilities.
Approach: They propose a visual scale recognition benchmark built using images from COCO, Open Images, and Flickr to evaluate scale recognition capabilities of multimodal large language models.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves 42.60% accuracy, lower than the 97.40% of humans.
MLLM-Protector: Ensuring MLLM’s Safety without Hurting Performance (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: MLLMs are deployed on limited image-text pairs, which makes them more vulnerable to catastrophic forgetting of their original abilities during safety fine-tuning.
Approach: They propose a plug-and-play strategy that detects harmful visual inputs and transforms harmful ones into harmless ones.
Outcome: The proposed approach mitigates the risks posed by malicious visual inputs without compromising the original performance of MLLMs.
Can’t See the Forest for the Trees: Benchmarking Multimodal Safety Awareness for Multimodal LLMs (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have expanded the capabilities of traditional language models by enabling interaction through both text and images.
Approach: They propose a multimodal safety awareness benchmark to evaluate MLLMs across 29 safety scenarios with 1,500 carefully curated image-prompt pairs.
Outcome: The proposed model is able to identify unsafe content and avoid over-sensitivity that can hinder helpfulness.
MIBench: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models over Multiple Images (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks and MLLMs focus on single-image input scenarios, leaving performance of ML models when handling multiple images underexplored.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate fine-grained abilities of multimodal large language models in multi-image scenarios.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark categorizes the multi-image abilities into three scenarios: MII, MKS and MIC.
MT-Video-Bench: A Holistic Video Understanding Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal LLMs in Multi-Turn Dialogues (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation benchmarks for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) focus on single-turn question answering, overlooking the complexity of multi-turn dialogues in real-world scenarios.
Approach: They propose a video understanding benchmark for MLLMs in multi-turn dialogues that assesses six core competencies that focus on perceptivity and interactivity.
Outcome: The MT-Video-Bench evaluates 1,000 multi-turn dialogues from diverse domains and reveals significant performance discrepancies and limitations in handling multi-turned video dialogues.
USB: A COMPREHENSIVE AND UNIFIED SAFETY EVALUATION BENCHMARK FOR MULTIMODAL LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing safety benchmarks fail to provide reliable assessments due to limited risk coverage, insufficient scale and the oversight of complex modality combinations.
Approach: They propose a framework that covers 61 risk categories across four modality interactions to address this gap.
Outcome: The proposed framework covers 61 risk categories across four distinct modality interactions.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations