Critic-CoT: Boosting the Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Model via Chain-of-Thought Critic (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Xin Zheng, Jie Lou, Boxi Cao, Xueru Wen, Yuqiu Ji, Hongyu Lin, Yaojie Lu, Xianpei Han, Debing Zhang, Le Sun
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to improve the reasoning performance of large language models rely on intuitive instance-level feedback, which limits the reasoning capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that pushes LLMs toward System-2-like critic capability by using a step-wise CoT reasoning paradigm and automatic construction of weak-supervision data without human annotation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model significantly improves task-solving performance by filtering out invalid solutions or iterative refinement. |
Similar Papers
CriticBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Critique-Correct Reasoning (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | CriticBench is a benchmark designed to assess LLMs’ abilities to critique and refine their reasoning across a variety of tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess LLMs' ability to critique and correct reasoning across a variety of tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark examines the performance of 17 large language models in generation, critique, and correction reasoning. |
IF-CRITIC: Towards a Fine-Grained LLM Critic for Instruction-Following Evaluation (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Bosi Wen, Yilin Niu, Cunxiang Wang, Pei Ke, Xiaoying Ling, Ying Zhang, Aohan Zeng, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation models for instruction-following have many shortcomings, such as substantial costs and unreliable assessments. |
| Approach: | They propose an LLM critic for fine-grained instruction-following evaluation using a checklist generator and a constraint-level preference optimization method. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model beats strong LLM-as-a-Judge baselines in evaluations under lower computational overhead compared to baselines. |
Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verification (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to solve complex natural language processing tasks require multiple steps to verify the answers. |
| Approach: | They propose to use chain of thought prompting to solve reasoning tasks with large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can improve reasoning performance on arithmetic, commonsense, and logical reasoning datasets. |
Vision-Language Models Can Self-Improve Reasoning via Reflection (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chain-of-thought (CoT) has been shown to improve the reasoning capability of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a framework which iteratively enhances the model’s Vision-language Reasoning by Reflecting on CoT Rationales. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves multimodal reasoning on vision-language tasks by 23% to 60% over baselines. |
Can Large Language Models Detect Errors in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning? (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yancheng He, Shilong Li, Jiaheng Liu, Weixun Wang, Xingyuan Bu, Ge Zhang, Z.y. Peng, Zhaoxiang Zhang, Zhicheng Zheng, Wenbo Su, Bo Zheng
| Challenge: | Recent advances in o1-like models have generated long Chain-of-Thought reasoning steps to improve the reasoning abilities of existing Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a DeltaBench to analyze the quality and effectiveness of o1-like models and measure their ability to detect errors in long COT reasoning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can detect errors in long COT reasoning. |
How Likely Do LLMs with CoT Mimic Human Reasoning? (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using chain-of-thought to elicit reasoning capabilities is not always effective and accurate. |
| Approach: | They compare the reasoning process of LLMs with humans to understand the causal chain . they find that LLM deviates from the ideal causal chain, resulting in spurious correlations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method does not improve performance or accurately represent reasoning processes in LLMs. |
Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matters (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting can dramatically improve the multi-step reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose to use Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting to encourage the LLM to generate intermediate rationales for solving a problem by providing a series of reasoning steps in the demonstrations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate coherent lines of reasoning even with invalid demonstrations while still generating coherent lines during inference. |
Fine-Tuning on Diverse Reasoning Chains Drives Within-Inference CoT Refinement in LLMs (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to generate multiple independent CoTs, combining them through ensembling or other post-hoc strategies, have been shown to be effective in boosting performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a method where LLMs are fine-tuned to generate a sequence of Diverse Chains of Thought (DCoT) within a single inference step. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate multiple chains of thought within a single inference step without external feedback. |
Large Language Models Can Self-Improve (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have excellent performance in various tasks, but fine-tuning requires extensive supervision. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a pre-trained Large Language Model to generate rationale-augmented answers for unlabeled questions and fine-tune the LLM using those self-generated solutions as target outputs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves the general reasoning ability of a 540B-parameter LLM without any ground truth label. |
Please Translate Again: Two Simple Experiments on Whether Human-Like Reasoning Helps Translation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities for many tasks, often by explicitly decomposing the task via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a multi-step prompt to decompose translation and train models to incorporate intermediate steps. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art on WMT24 data and shows that prompting LLMs to “translate again” and self-refine yields even better results than human-like step-by-step prompting. |