Context and POS in Action: A Comparative Study of Chinese Homonym Disambiguation in Human and Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Ambiguity is pervasive in language, yet we resolve it effortlessly and unconsciously . ambiguity is common because languages allow words to take on multiple meanings . |
| Approach: | They build a sentence-pair dataset to examine how context and POS influence homonym resolution in humans and large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset compared humans and large language models to determine how POS and context influence homonym resolution in humans. |
Similar Papers
Exploring Layer-wise Representations of English and Chinese Homonymy in Pre-trained Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | lexical ambiguity can arise due to the misunderstanding of its multiple senses. |
| Approach: | They propose to use part of speech to examine homonyms in Chinese and English . they find no universal layer depth excels in differentiating homnomial representations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves contextualization of homonym representations in Chinese . the results challenge the simplistic understanding of their inner workings, the authors say . |
Exploring the Representation of Word Meanings in Context: A Case Study on Homonymy and Synonymy (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models that represent different senses of words in context are not accurate for polysemous words. |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual dataset that evaluates the ability of models to accurately represent different lexical-semantic relations such as homonymy and synonymy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can disambiguate homonyms in context, but fail to represent words with different senses when occurring in similar sentences. |
Patterns of Polysemy and Homonymy in Contextualised Language Models (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study has focused on homonymy, a variety of multiplicity of meanings exemplified by word forms with unrelated meanings. |
| Approach: | They investigate the extent to which contextualised embeddings reflect traditional distinctions of polysemy and homonymy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model shows that it can distinguish between polysemy and homonymy . it shows that the model fails to replicate the results of the human-annotated dataset . |
That was the last straw, we need more: Are Translation Systems Sensitive to Disambiguating Context? (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for translation of ambiguous text use context to disambiguate meaning . current models for MTs consistently translate English idioms literally, whereas LMs are context-aware . |
| Approach: | They use a dataset of 512 pairs of English sentences to study semantic ambiguities . they use literal and figurative idioms to disambiguate intended meaning . |
| Outcome: | The results show that current models translate English idioms literally, even when the context suggests a figurative interpretation. |
Exploring Context Strategies in LLMs for Discourse-Aware Machine Translation (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models excel at machine translation, but the impact of how LLMs utilize different forms of contextual information on discourse-level phenomena remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They examine how different forms of context influence standard MT metrics and specific discourse phenomena such as formality, pronoun selection, and lexical cohesion. |
| Outcome: | Evaluating multiple LLMs across multiple domains and language pairs, the findings consistently show that context boosts translation and discourse-specific performance. |
Do Context-Aware Translation Models Pay the Right Attention? (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Context-aware machine translation models fail to leverage contextual information to resolve ambiguous words and pronouns. |
| Approach: | They propose a new dataset that includes supporting context words for 14K translations that professional translators found useful for pronoun disambiguation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can automatically disambiguate pronouns and polysemous words when they are not in the same context. |
Who Relies More on World Knowledge and Bias for Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution: Humans or LLMs? (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Among various types of ambiguity, this study focuses on syntactic ambiguities, specifically relative 1 Dataset available at https://github.com/PortNLP/ MultiWHO. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a dataset to fine-grained evaluate relative clause attachment preferences in ambiguous and unambiguous contexts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset shows that large language models perform well in unambiguous cases, but lack flexibility in human language processing. |
Analyzing Homonymy Disambiguation Capabilities of Pretrained Language Models (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
Lorenzo Proietti, Stefano Perrella, Simone Tedeschi, Giulia Vulpis, Leonardo Lavalle, Andrea Sanchietti, Andrea Ferrari, Roberto Navigli
| Challenge: | Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) is a key task in Natural Language Processing (NLP) but current pretrained language models lack the granularity to perform disambiguation . |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale resource that leverages homonymy relations to cluster WordNet senses and train Homonymy Disambiguation systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can distinguish homonyms with up to 95% accuracy even without fine-tuning the underlying PLM. |
Do LLMs Capture Embodied Cognition and Cultural Variation? Cross-Linguistic Evidence from Demonstratives (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new study examines whether large language models acquire embodied cognition and cultural conventions from training data . demonstratives are a natural lens for evaluating linguistic phenomena that reflect cultural variation . aaron e. duan and j. nà: "the complexity of the language model is a major challenge for LLMs" |
| Approach: | They introduce demonstratives as a probe for grounded knowledge by analyzing 6,400 responses from 320 native speakers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model fails to understand proximal–distal contrast and shows no cultural differences . the proposed model is a new probe for evaluating embodied cognition and cultural conventions . |
Reference-less Analysis of Context Specificity in Translation with Personalised Language Models (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
Sebastian Vincent, Rowanne Sumner, Alice Dowek, Charlotte Prescott, Emily Preston, Chris Bayliss, Chris Oakley, Carolina Scarton
| Challenge: | Conventional approaches to NLP tasks build models in a one-size-fits-all fashion disregarding the context of the processed text. |
| Approach: | They build LMs which leverage rich contextual information to reduce perplexity by up to 6.5% compared to a non-contextual model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models reduce perplexity by up to 6.5% compared to non-contextual models and generalise well to a scenario with no speaker-specific data. |